Gaborn said:
None of which addresses our addiction to oil in the next 4 years. I want to know his solution for that man that can't afford to pay his gas.
Therein lies the problem.
Our addiction to oil can't be solved in 4 years by anyone. It is literally impossible. For the short term, that man is SOL, aside from some government program to help pay for gas for the poor, although I don't want something like that and you certainly don't either. Aside from that or widespread government regulation on oil prices, there isn't much that can take oil prices down, and neither of those are guaranteed to work. If he can't even afford to get to work, his employer should give him a raise so he can actually afford to get there. That, or find a new job, preferably one closer to his residence.
The only things that Obama can really do (in his first year at least) is up the funding for alternative fuel research, encourage businesses to wean themselves off of oil with tax breaks or something, and maybe work with auto manufacturers to get them to move more in the direction of hydrogen and electric cars (more of a move towards mass adoption, not just experimental stuff). All he can do is really get the ball rolling. After 8 years of Bush, we sadly have to start at square one with this. If we had a President who was willing to face the energy realities of the 21st century in 2001 or even 2004, we would be in better shape energywise. The problem wouldn't be anywhere near solved, but the wheels would at least be turning.
EDIT: Just to clarify, I'm talking about motions that, while the short-term effects may not be as pronounced, will effect the long term in greater ways. The last couple of decades (at least) have been filled with nothing but stopgap, short term solutions, and look how far that has gotten us.