DirtyManos
Member
Eeeeeeeesh.
Major networks also discussing the article too now on TV.
Major networks also discussing the article too now on TV.
No this is bullshit revisionist history. Bernie Sander has been given the equivalent of a free political ride throughout this primary. Hillary has been treating him with kid gloves this entire time and the Republicans have actually been positive towards him in hope that he can damage Hillary.
Bernie Sander has has every conceivable advantage given to him and he still decided to run a fucking horrible campaign. He lost decisively and now we know just how much of a piece of shit he really is behind the curtain,
Why though? He did it to himself.Whether or not the article is factual, mostly, half true, or bullshit, this is all so sad to see it end like this. I feel bad for Bernie to an extent.
Eeeeeeeesh.
Major networks also discussing the article too now on TV.
Whether or not the article is factual, mostly, half true, or bullshit, this is all so sad to see it end like this. I feel bad for Bernie to an extent.
I don't think his position was attacked enough.I never thought he was kid gloved. The NY TIMES early on endorsed Hillary. Vox was pretty anti-Bernie. I know this board loves Hillary but I never thought Bernie was kid gloved.
It was more like the media never took Bernie seriously until he started winning. The media then started attacking Bernie's positions that I feel the media would normally support like healthcare.
I feel the media though of Bernie as the crazy old kook who Hillary would beat handily early on.
Whether or not the article is factual, mostly, half true, or bullshit, this is all so sad to see it end like this. I feel bad for Bernie to an extent.
Its not over until the FBI says it is.
Yes, he did. Just remembering there are many humans involved that devoted so much time, money and effort despite all the stupidity and fuck-ups involved.Why though? He did it to himself.
There are a lot of hard feeling at the end of long campaigns. If you listen to the "Keeping it 1600" podcast on BSPN, you can get some of this firsthand. The hosts of that podcast are people that worked for Obama during the 2008 and then in the White House, they're current supporters of Hillary for President, and at the end of the 2008 primary, they hated her. They convinced themselves they had to. And they were the winners.
One of them related a story in a recent podcast where Hillary preferred a certain horse in the Kentucky Derby and drew an analogy to her own campaign with it. In a Derby pool inside the Obama campaign, one of the other staffers actually selected that horse and one of the hosts admitted to being irrationally furious at this staffer, calling him a traitor and being serious while doing it.
This was all going on inside the Obama campaign, a side that was winning. Imagine the feelings on the other side, and project that forward to 2016.
Oh wow, I need to check those out. Links?Keeping it 1600 had recent episodes on how you wind down a losing campaign. Sounded pretty awful especially when the candidate has poured their soul into it like I assume Bernie has. Crappy situation to be in.
Absolutely understandable why you feel that way. I felt a lot of anger too. I was a bit more forgiving until March-ish.I don't, he's been throwing people under buses since January.
Yes, the statement you're responding to is petty and hyperbolic. But so is yours.
While I certainly don't think the media was hard on Bernie, I wouldn't go as far as saying he has had every conceivable advantage, either. After-all, most media coverage was on the republican circus and the dem primary was normally a footnote until something big happened.
Then again, Bernie was treated quite well in his appearances in talk shows.
Oh wow, I need to check those out. Links?
Absolutely understandable why you feel that way. I felt a lot of anger too. I was a bit more forgiving until March-ish.
He seems like a nice guy with good ideas, it's pretty funny to watch your country just bury him now. Shame, you guys will never learn.
I fully intend to enjoy a president who's not a bigoted bullying hothead or a prideful single-issue ideologue who's ill equipped to get anything done in the current political climate. We don't need a president who cares about us right now. We need a socially progressive pragmatist with foreign policy experience who won't allow conservatives to undo Obama's achievements.Im not debating she won. But only the blind can claim it a fair victory.
And to whoever it applies to: Go ahead and post gifs to imply my foolishness or bitterness with no subtance to back it. Enjoy your president that doesnt care about you.
Why though? He did it to himself.
Given Sander's willingness to damage the credibility of the one major party that doesn't actively screw over minorities or his half hearted attempts to speak to minorities, I'm going to have to disagree with you here.
He definitely did not have every advantage possible. Before his surge, the media basically treated him the same way they did the two also rans; an amusing footnote. That said, when he did begin his surge, he definitely was treated well. I would argue he was definitely better treated than the Republican candidates who had brief surges, like Carson. Though that was partly Carson's own doing.
Why though? He did it to himself.
His socialist dogma and near mono-white constituency combine to form a guy who's completely out of touch with anything resembling a minority experience in America.You implied that Sander's doesn't care about the well-being of anybody but white people. That's hyperbole. I'll agree that he didn't do enough outreach to minority groups from a political perspective, but no more than that.
If they hadnt started at it by really going hard at him on guns, raising a series of issues against him, that really was what led to him being much, much more aggressive than he otherwise would have been.
Oh wow, I need to check those out. Links?
Absolutely understandable why you feel that way. I felt a lot of anger too. I was a bit more forgiving until March-ish.
Thanks you two!Doing all the hard work for me! Thanks. Really loving that podcast. Love just two bros talking about politics really casually and reminiscing about the good times in the Obama admin.
Which ones?
MSNBC has been talking about it.
His socialist dogma and near mono-white constituency combine to form a guy who's completely out of touch with anything resembling a minority experience in America.
Thanks you two!
I'd simply say he's out of touch and leave it at that. He hardly alienated minorities in more than one or two statements throughout his campaign, he merely didn't court them. His focus on the poor wasn't monoracial, he just had a simplistic view of politics.
Is this the ultimate result of people who talk about revolutions?
Spreading now.
This is the reality of waging a bitter campaign the way Bernie did. It doesn't result in some long lived legacy that "Begins here" and shoots off into the stratosphere becoming some fairy tale. It ends with you losing, your staff throwing you under the bus while the other 90% of Liberals post "YAAAS" 10k times per second in chatrooms and message boards everywhere.
He had his chance to exit gracefully and he didn't take it.
.
Bye Felicia. It's a good thing you won't be more than a footnote.It was the Vermont senator who personally rewrote his campaign managers shorter statement after the chaos at the Nevada state party convention and blamed the political establishment for inciting the violence.
Bernie is this cycles Ron Paul.
Nothing he did will change anything notable. He's a footnote in history.
It's not what he wanted, but that's reality.
You implied that Sander's doesn't care about the well-being of anybody but white people. That's hyperbole. I'll agree that he didn't do enough outreach to minority groups from a political perspective, but no more than that.
And to be clear, I don't like Bernie. I'm really glad that he's not getting through the primary. I'dve voted for him only to stop Trump and little more if he had.
I'm not arguing that what coverage he did get wasn't mostly positive, I'm arguing that Trump got most of the coverage, period, bottomline leaving little for Bernie.
He burned every single last bridge. I have to hope to high praise that he truly felt it was worth it.
Bernie is this cycles Ron Paul.
Nothing he did will change anything notable. He's a footnote in history.
It's not what he wanted, but that's reality.
Then I suspect we won't ever reach a concenssus here. Sanders sold a fantasy that wealth inequality was the source of all ills and only barely changed his message to accomodate race after a BLM rally and demographic realities forced his hand in doing so.
And even then, he's been more than happy to cultivate that white world view in his young supporters and convinced them this was the only real problem to solve, as doing so would automatically fix everything else.
This was a man who was more than happy to disregard black southerners because they didn't vote for him. He then allowed that feeling to foster in amongst his supporters. Yes, the cliche of "those uppity blacks!" is cruel and doesn't describe all Sanders supporters, but there are reasons why it's persisted for so long.
I am not American. But it is not a uniquely American experience for white people to tell minorities they know what's best for us, and then turn aggressive when we disagree. That is a long and sordid history, and we've become pretty good at smelling out rats.
Oh no, I wasn't trying to argue with you on this. Just wanted to add my own observations to your initial post