Hmm, well, I just find it strange that there are no visits to CO or VA but he's going to WI three times.
Wait, don't you think it's strange he's not visiting VA or CO? Is that a sign they think both are already lost? Oh, man. Epic ffs. It's so scary.
Uh oh, some shit going down in Libya again.... Fuck these assholes. Rebels invaded parliament, saying some ministers have ties to Ghaddafi.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-20170826
Surprise. Libya is still chaotic. And although the elections were a welcome development, the process will be turbulent. What's most worrisome is the abundance of heavy armaments. The proliferation of weapons throughout North Africa has not only destabilized Libya, but the insurgencies in Mali and perhaps even Niger and Somalia are profiting. It's essential the government of Libya inhibit the flow of weapons. But as I've noted in previous posts, they may be helpless in that respect.
I found this article interesting:
http://storify.com/DigitalFirst/the-election-is-over/embed?header=false&border=false
Maybe you guys (from both sides) should temper your premature partying a bit
I didn't. It's neither interesting nor informative. It misconstrues many of the sources; did they even read them? For example, "Polls don't matter because it's the fundamentals, such as the economy, that decide elections." They erroneously present Dickinson's stricture as evidence to ignore polls. But that's a terribly inaccurate characterization. Rather, Dickinson argues that polls lack theoretical value. A poll cannot explain an election, whereas the fundamentals explain vote share. They possess value for theorizing about electoral determinants. Dickinson readily acknowledges polls are useful for forecasting. However, polls in June, when the article was posted, are largely irrelevant. His intention is to caution against the media's obsession with polls early in the cycle when they're uninformative. That article was shit.