Pope Goes Full Socialist, Calls for 'Legitimate Redistribution of Wealth'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cool, so I don't have to work and I'll still get money? I think I'll take the day off.

(not sustainable)

That said there Ned's to be a correction for 60 million CEO pay and them hooking up their buddies with board positions and stock options.

Technology will force this soon anyway. It's not like the private sector is creating enough jobs to reach full employment currently.
 
I missed the part where he says that.

You gotta do Da Vinci code stuff on everything the Pope says. Print out the transcript, carbon date the piece of paper it's printed on, then hold it under a candle while shining a blacklight on every other sentence.
 
I always like Christians who feel this way. I'm not a Christian but I really appreciate really open minded and sympathetic Christians. I much appreciate open minded and compassionate Christians than mean atheists.

I myself am a bit of a Socialist or Communist. Though I tend to lean towards Anarchist versions of Socialism and Communism. I don't think that competition drives innovation or productivity or wealth for society. And I don't think that people are basically selfish, though a lot of people are raised to be. There is a lot of cruelty in the world, but we can create and empathetic society where people are no longer unequal. I want a compassionate, innocent, kind, equal world.

A lot of people associate socialism and communism with people like Joseph Stalin. But I personally identify with people like Peter Kropotkin.
 
Imagine if the church had guys like this in charge when they ruled the world.

But then again you don't gain that much control in the first place by being nice.
 
I always like Christians who feel this way. I'm not a Christian but I really appreciate really open minded and sympathetic Christians. I much appreciate open minded and compassionate Christians than mean atheists.

I myself am a bit of a Socialist or Communist. Though I tend to lean towards Anarchist versions of Socialism and Communism. I don't think that competition drives innovation or productivity or wealth for society. And I don't think that people are basically selfish, though a lot of people are raised to be. There is a lot of cruelty in the world, but we can create and empathetic society where people are no longer unequal. I want a compassionate, innocent, kind, equal world.

A lot of people associate socialism and communism with people like Joseph Stalin. But I personally identify with people like Peter Kropotkin.

I agree with this post so much!
 
He said a more equal form of economic progress can be had through "the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the state, as well as indispensable cooperation between the private sector and civil society."

I am so glad Francis actually spelled that out in no uncertain terms. For far too long, the Bible thumpers on Fox News and talk radio have claimed that all that help the poor crap that that Jesus guy was yammering on about was supposed to be a mere guideline (a suggestion, even!) and not an actual requirement to get into heaven. Especially not one that's enforced big government.
 
What conservative Catholics reject the New Deal era safety net and embrace a "fuck you I got mine ideology?"
Paul Ryan.

It's true that Catholics vote slightly more to the democrats than the general population, but that's driven by Hispanics.
White catholic voted pretty much inline with white people.
 
Cool, so I don't have to work and I'll still get money? I think I'll take the day off.

(not sustainable)

That said there Ned's to be a correction for 60 million CEO pay and them hooking up their buddies with board positions and stock options.

So you agree with the Pope then. Don't know what the fuck that first part is talking about.

What conservative Catholics reject the New Deal era safety net and embrace a "fuck you I got mine ideology?"

Australias-opposition-lea-010.jpg


Tony Abbott, Prime Minister of Australia.
 
I see I am not needed here. Socialism is not redistribution.
They are confused frequently because both aim for the same result (equality) just different ways of getting there for socialism it's the collectivism of private property for social democracies it's the more equal distribution of wealth.. although the means of the former can overlap with the latter.
 
I am so glad Francis actually spelled that out in no uncertain terms. For far too long, the Bible thumpers on Fox News and talk radio have claimed that all that help the poor crap that that Jesus guy was yammering on about was supposed to be a mere guideline (a suggestion, even!) and not an actual requirement to get into heaven. Especially not one that's enforced big government.

Nope, they still miss the point
The guy's reading of scripture seems sound, although I would point out the pretty obvious hole in his interpretation is that governments in a modern form didn't exist during the time of the Bible's writing, and couldn't actually redistribute wealth in the same way. Also, that I don't think telling rich people 'you should be more generous' is likely to work.

Well, the real hole in his argument is that that's not what the pope said. The pope said the state has a role to play. He's ignoring that and using the popes quoting of scripture to arrive not at the conclusion the pope did but at the conclusion he wants.
 
Paul Ryan.

It's true that Catholics vote slightly more to the democrats than the general population, but that's driven by Hispanics.
White catholic voted pretty much inline with white people.

The Ryan budgets are political documents prepared in the context of divided government. Regardless of what politicians say now in day-to-day political combat, demographics (ironically thanks to safe and reliable contraceptive sex) guarantee that the rate of social spending will slow after decades of steady increases. The good vs evil approach some liberals view the issue through is indistinguishable from religion.

I hear the words of the pope like most of you - a few sentences in a wire story that picks out what Western news agencies consider newsworthy in his speeches. I haven't read the whole speech, but based on the rates of regular church attendance and religious belief in Western Europe, I doubt the pope believes the Western European model that liberals favor is one to aspire to in totality. The Catholic third way has a long history among intellectuals and popes - interesting background here, including Tolken.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/pope-francis-needs-distributism/
 
This shouldn't surprise people. Catholicism is very society orientated whereas Protestants are about the individual. Bootstraps, salvation through work and other crap comes from the Protestant 'work ethic'.
 
But to be fair Francesco, killing babies you cannot afford is a pretty good method to "attack the root causes of poverty and hunger", and probably protects the environment too.

And as for "redistribution of wealth" point to where it says that in the bible and the christian country of America might believe you.
 
But to be fair Francesco, killing babies you cannot afford is a pretty good method to "attack the root causes of poverty and hunger", and probably protects the environment too.
.
That's interesting. I'd be curious to have your take on what the root cause of poverty and hunger is to think that "killing babies" is the solution to it.
 
The Ryan budgets are political documents prepared in the context of divided government. Regardless of what politicians say now in day-to-day political combat, demographics (ironically thanks to safe and reliable contraceptive sex) guarantee that the rate of social spending will slow after decades of steady increases. The good vs evil approach some liberals view the issue through is indistinguishable from religion.

I hear the words of the pope like most of you - a few sentences in a wire story that picks out what Western news agencies consider newsworthy in his speeches. I haven't read the whole speech, but based on the rates of regular church attendance and religious belief in Western Europe, I doubt the pope believes the Western European model that liberals favor is one to aspire to in totality. The Catholic third way has a long history among intellectuals and popes - interesting background here, including Tolken.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/pope-francis-needs-distributism/
I didn't say the word good or evil.
I do however find it kinda surprising that you think Paul Ryan supports the new deal, his ideological background pretty much reject that approach.
He supported Bush's Social Security privatization proposal, he support medicare voucherizatoin and he want to change medicaid to a block grant system.

For real, you think someone like Paul Ryan support a single payer healthcare system for any reason other than electoral?
 
That's interesting. I'd be curious to have your take on what the root cause of poverty and hunger is to think that "killing babies" is the solution to it.

It was tongue in cheek, I didn't mean to offend, and I was specifically talking about people who have abortions because they are not in a stable financial position to support them. Children go hungry when their parents can't afford to feed them.

And I agree with the Pope that the root cause of poverty is the distribution of wealth.
 
I myself am a bit of a Socialist or Communist. Though I tend to lean towards Anarchist versions of Socialism and Communism. I don't think that competition drives innovation or productivity or wealth for society. And I don't think that people are basically selfish, though a lot of people are raised to be. There is a lot of cruelty in the world, but we can create and empathetic society where people are no longer unequal. I want a compassionate, innocent, kind, equal world.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong!

That's all a pipe dream. People are inherently bad and given enough power without accountability will corrupt.

Innovation, productivity and wealth are driven by competition ... that is the basic definition of competition. Do something better. Innovate, create a new better idea than everyone else. Productivity, make your idea work better than everyone else and wealth ... your reward.

If you want a compassionate, innocent, kind and equal world. You need to hold everyone accountable, punish those who sloth, steal, murder and sin their way. Reward those who are good, kind and compassionate.

You can't have everyone treated equally. You have the good treated better and the bad treated worst. That is a truly compassionate society.
 
I can understand limiting the wage gap and somehow maxing maximum wages if it is something done worldwide, but I wouldn't like a legitimate redistribution of wealth. I save a lot of money, so I have more money than for instance coworkers who earn more but don't save that well. A redistribution of wealth would imply I'd be punished for being frugal.
 
I can understand limiting the wage gap and somehow maxing maximum wages if it is something done worldwide, but I wouldn't like a legitimate redistribution of wealth. I save a lot of money, so I have more money than for instance coworkers who earn more but don't save that well. A redistribution of wealth would imply I'd be punished for being frugal.

I think a redistribution would likely affect the old 1%. The top earners would see their earnings capped and spread as evenly as possible for those below them.

Unless you're a 1%-er you would likely gain money rather than lose it, and it'd likely be more in ways of salaries/money earned than anything else.
 
I can understand limiting the wage gap and somehow maxing maximum wages if it is something done worldwide, but I wouldn't like a legitimate redistribution of wealth. I save a lot of money, so I have more money than for instance coworkers who earn more but don't save that well. A redistribution of wealth would imply I'd be punished for being frugal.

Redistribution is just another for fair taxation.

The rich prefer sales taxes because they soak the poor more, for example, while trying to abolish property taxes.
 
Hey, that's pretty christlike. News for the catholic church, their PR team is definitely improving.
I'm not saying sell to random rich white dudes, I'm saying sell to museums and other places where the art can be appreciated.

vatican_museum_queue.jpg

Line to the Vatican Museums, on a very typical day.
 
Line to the Vatican Museums, on a very typical day.
It is basically one of the biggest museums worldwide, it is number 6. There are 5 million visitors each year, so indeed, it wouldn't make sense to give their collection to museums. They are already one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_visited_art_museums_in_the_world

So will the Vatican be redistributing its wealth among the poor? Catholic churches going to finally start paying taxes?
They're the biggest charity worldwide by a huge, huge margin. They're using their money for education and health care all over the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom