• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Post-Women's March: white women, working class, and people might need to reflect

Status
Not open for further replies.
said no one, but continue

Am I misunderstanding the point of the protesters sign in the OP? Or is she just wanting the white female posters to "check their privilege" while protesting. Its a pretty regressive sign regardless


Who said this?

women_s_march_white_women_trump_by_digi_matrix-dawg4fg.png



This person is saying white women shouldn't be protesting, and instead should have stayed home looking in the mirror. Seems pretty cut and dry to me.
 

sazzy

Member
The left seems to be intent on infighting and gutting itself instead of fighting the marching forces of the right.

edit- bookmarking this thread for 2020, so I can point to it and say, 'this is why trump's gotten reelected, because you wouldn't stop fighting amongst yourselves.'
 

Deepwater

Member
Am I misunderstanding the point of the protesters sign in the OP? Or is she just wanting the white female posters to "check their privilege" while protesting. Its a pretty regressive sign regardless

The crux of the issue is that most white women do not analyze the intersection of their race and gender and how those identities led to the majority of white women across most spectrums voted for Trump.

You can't have a Women's March with mostly white women who don't understand the privilege of being white AND a woman, while simultaneously expecting women of color to stand beside you in solidarity.
 

akira28

Member
Am I misunderstanding the point of the protesters sign in the OP? Or is she just wanting the white female posters to "check their privilege" while protesting. Its a pretty regressive sign regardless
clearly
Or is she just wanting the white female posters to "check their privilege" while protesting. Its a pretty regressive sign regardless
misunderstanding it or worse

I mean surely she got out of bed to protest those women posing there.
 
I'm not saying I'm going around being antagonistic to people but I fail to see that pic and tweet are making white people upset enough to vote against their own interests. I fail to see how academic discourse around structural racism is making white people vote against their own interests. I fail to see how terms like white privilege are making white people vote against their own interests. If that's truly the issue then this is much deeper than people on the internet reminding them that they're white and nothing you and I can fix by altering our language

You acknowledge that the result of the election came down to irrational decision making and yet you fail to see how pics or tweets (because these are not the only examples) can sway some tiny yet ultimately decisive fraction of the electorate one way or another?

And once again I am not talking about academic discourse. This discussion isn't taking place in that framework.
 

D i Z

Member
Am I misunderstanding the point of the protesters sign in the OP? Or is she just wanting the white female posters to "check their privilege" while protesting. Its a pretty regressive sign regardless




women_s_march_white_women_trump_by_digi_matrix-dawg4fg.png



This person is saying white women shouldn't be protesting, and instead should have stayed home looking in the mirror. Seems pretty cut and dry to me.

How many bodies showed up for these "rights" over the last decade when protests where happening all over the country, vs the bodies that showed up for themselves over the weekend. The distinction is undeniable.

The left seems to be intent on infighting and gutting itself instead of fighting the marching forces of the right.

Your understanding of the rallying points is in need of some serious education, not buzz words.
 
You can't have a Women's March with mostly white women who don't understand the privilege of being white AND a woman, while simultaneously expecting women of color to stand beside you in solidarity.

How should they gain admittance then? Is there a test? Voting and protesting not enough?
 

ExVicis

Member
Why does the left have to turn on itself so much? Is it really helpful to begin infighting when you're already in bad shape?

The left seems to be intent on infighting and gutting itself instead of fighting the marching forces of the right.

edit- bookmarking this thread for 2020, so I can point to it and say, 'this is why trump's gotten reelected, because you wouldn't stop fighting amongst yourselves.'
I'm with you on this. I've noticed the left loves to do this for no reason and with nothing to gain by doing it. It's so goddamn frustrating.
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
This almost seems thread worthy to me TBH. There's been so much arguing over these numbers since the election with absolutely no context. People need to read that.

But also: source?

https://news.vice.com/story/white-people-voted-to-elect-donald-trump
Also
http://www.edisonresearch.com/category/election-polling/
While most voters did have a favorable view of one of the two major candidates – an astonishing 18% of the electorate told us they had an unfavorable opinion of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. And this is the group that won the election for Trump.
 

WaffleTaco

Wants to outlaw technological innovation.
The crux of the issue is that most white women do not analyze the intersection of their race and gender and how those identities led to the majority of white women across most spectrums voted for Trump.

You can't have a Women's March with mostly white women who don't understand the privilege of being white AND a woman, while simultaneously expecting women of color to stand beside you in solidarity.
So we are to blame for other stupid white women voting for Trump? I think the people marching on Saturday know about white privilege.
 

Deepwater

Member
For sure they do.

So we can agree that WoC are justified in leveraging critiques against white women on that basis?

It kind of misses the point if every time we talk about white privilege we have to #NotAll___
It wouldn't be privilege if it wasn't by large and far a systematic thing.
 

D i Z

Member
Why does the left have to turn on itself so much? Is it really helpful to begin infighting when you're already in bad shape?

The way forward needs to be scrutinized, and examined for all to move together. Not dismissed and given an "oh well" when it fails for some, but not for others.
Nobody is eating anybodies souls here.
 

Deepwater

Member
So we are to blame for other stupid white women voting for Trump? I think the people marching on Saturday know about white privilege.

But I am not talking _only_ about white privilege. I am talking about white female privilege. Which I would posit, that the majority of people marching on Saturday did not know about.

"I mean, we're all Women, why are we dividing ourselves???"
 
The way forward needs to be scrutinized, and examined for all to move together. Not dismissed and given an "oh well" when it fails for some, but not for others.

The right doesn't give a shit what we call them, so the only people left to attack is our own.
 

Staccat0

Fail out bailed
This thread has gotten pretty interesting. There has been some bullshit and posturing but a lot of honest and frank discussion too.

Maybe the most interesting aspect is that there seems to be a comedic disconnect between the way black people seemingly (Understandably even) see themselves as part of a loose collective with a shared experience. Weirdly, as a child of the 90s with liberal parents I was taught over and over that it is racist to think of people this way and I don't think that's unique.

Meanwhile, white people see themselves almost entirely as their professions and class as a result of well... not having been oppsressed or seriously opposed.

I'm not sure how you bridge a communication barrier like that. You talk about "white people" and we are like "huh? Which white people?"
 

FZZ

Banned
Okay I think we are in agreement then. Are you specifically talking about the women that voted for Trump or appeasing who?

Nah ofc not, just those who are always saying they feel vilified when people point out the statistic like the one in the OP

this is for everyone

I only have the back of those who have mines. People of all backgrounds and identities voted for Trump, but the overwhelming majority were white men and a majority were white women. For those I don't stand with, as well as all the other people who voted for him. The minorities of the minorities that were Trump supporters aren't with me as well. So I won't be there for them.
 

WedgeX

Banned
The crux of the issue is that most white women do not analyze the intersection of their race and gender and how those identities led to the majority of white women across most spectrums voted for Trump.

You can't have a Women's March with mostly white women who don't understand the privilege of being white AND a woman, while simultaneously expecting women of color to stand beside you in solidarity.

I have to ask if you actually talked to women at the march? Because women like my wife and her friends talk about exactly this.
 

WaffleTaco

Wants to outlaw technological innovation.
But I am not talking _only_ about white privilege. I am talking about white female privilege. Which I would posit, that the majority of people marching on Saturday did not know about.

"I mean, we're all Women, why are we dividing ourselves???"
What's the difference between white privilege and white female privilege?
 

Infinite

Member
You acknowledge that the result of the election came down to irrational decision making and yet you fail to see how pics or tweets (because these are not the only examples) can sway some tiny yet ultimately decisive fraction of the electorate one way or another?

And once again I am not talking about academic discourse. This discussion isn't taking place in that framework.

Either way, this is way low on the totem pole of shit that had influenced the election. Like I said in that post I don't think this is a problem solved with the way people like us on the internet talk about racism. If the mere mentioning of white privilege is enough for white people to take their ball and vote republican then there's really nothing fix by talking about it differently. The fact is it needs to be talked about and it has to be talked about if we want to make any moves towards dismantling it. The problem at that point becomes whether or not this is something they as a group even acknowledge or worse, want in the first place. If that's the issue what plays do we have there as a group? Do the dems fashion themselves as republican lite and risk losing their most consistent voting blocks? That doesn't sound like you'll be winning any elections either.
 

Imm0rt4l

Member
So much concern trolling with "this is how we get 8 years of trump" nonsense

News flash, intersectional feminists have been putting white feminism on blast for a hot minute now, this isn't new. In fighting is a natural aspect of any movement.
 
But I am not talking _only_ about white privilege. I am talking about white female privilege. Which I would posit, that the majority of people marching on Saturday did not know about.

"I mean, we're all Women, why are we dividing ourselves???"

It's not really fair to make that assumption about them though. You'd think that, since they were out there at all, that they are to some degree aware. Discounting them as uneducated just because they're white women is not the move. Apply that to those who say things like what you've written, or to people being willfully ignorant like the many men in this thread, but if someone's being positive why attribute negativity to them without any evidence?
 

Deepwater

Member
I have to ask if you actually talked to women at the march? Because women like my wife and her friends talk about exactly this.

Okay, so while you're presenting your anecdotal evidence, we have 20+ pages (along with older locked threads) to counterposit that clearly people don'tget it.

If the _majority_ of people understood why white female privilege is a thing, why is the picture and tweets in the OP so controversial to so many?
 

LionPride

Banned
But I am not talking _only_ about white privilege. I am talking about white female privilege. Which I would posit, that the majority of people marching on Saturday did not know about.

"I mean, we're all Women, why are we dividing ourselves???"

What's the difference between white privilege and white female privilege?
There isn't a difference, and I'm willing to bet most white people marching Saturday, understands they have privilege by being born White.

So much concern trolling with "this is how we get 8 years of trump" nonsense

News flash, intersectional feminists have been putting white feminism on blast for a hot minute now, this isn't new. In fighting is a natural aspect of any movement.
Mmmhmm
 

ExVicis

Member
The way forward needs to be scrutinized, and examined for all to move together. Not dismissed and given an "oh well" when it fails for some, but not for others.
Nobody is eating anybodies souls here.
I thought change came from trial, error and finding and understanding commonalities and universal truths along the way. Coming together kind of does that, though I think carelessly tossing out generalities and sweeping statements isn't the path to that.
 

ExVicis

Member
This isn't the left turning on itself.

This is moderates finding out they aren't as left as they thought they were.
This mimics the kind of shit communists used to say to each other back when the 4th International Started. The end result of that was so many splinters that there ended up being 3 to 4 4th Internationals and the complete destruction of the movement due to infighting.
 

Deepwater

Member
It's not really fair to make that assumption about them though. You'd think that, since they were out there at all, that they are to some degree aware. Discounting them as uneducated just because they're white women is not the move. Apply that to those who say things like what you've written, or to people being willfully ignorant like the many men in this thread, but if someone's being positive why attribute negativity to them without any evidence?

Like I mentioned before, if we're arguing that the white women (at the march or in general) understand white female privilege, why are those tweets and sign controversial? Obviously everybody was in on the joke.

What's the difference between white privilege and white female privilege?

White Female privilege is having a march in over a hundred cities and different countries with thousands of people and get characterized as "peaceful", but black women march against police brutality and get teargassed.
 

Pizoxuat

Junior Member
What's the difference between white privilege and white female privilege?
White women are subjected to benevolent sexism that black and brown women are not. A majority black women's march is not getting high fives from the cops, but a majority white women's march is assumed harmless, for example. I think benevolent sexism is the better term than white female privledge, the core of it is that we are top of the heap of white male property as long as we behave properly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom