Press shot of Apple iPhone 5C (budget model) leaks

Status
Not open for further replies.
These cheap iPhones look so bad they will not move in the Euro/Chinese markets.

I wish there is a word for "Fisher Price", because calling them "ShanZhai" would be giving them credit.

Xiaomi Mi2 looks basically the same and sells pretty well.
 
I still remember when iPhone 4 came out and obliterated everything. It has been awhile since we saw anything like that.
 
I still remember when iPhone 4 came out and obliterated everything. It has been awhile since we saw anything like that.
And it'll be a long time before that happens again, from apple or anyone else.

The only cellphone release that was even somewhat comparable was the hype surrounding the GS3 last year.
 
The iPhone 4S is already competitive at $550, they were about 30% of iPhone sales last quarter. LTE is a non-factor in most of the markets Apple sells in. It is still an appealing design. The iPhone 4 with the same design also did well. They make money on 30 pin accessories just as well as Lightning accessories, which is why they still sell iPads, iPods and iPhones with the connector for the past year.

iPhone 4 and 4S sell very well, but a great number of those units are in America where they're being heavily subsidized. They also do well in off-contract markets in China and India in no small part because Apple is offering specially-targeted pricing incentives there - rebates, installment plans. But they don't do as well as they could in these markets because the iPhone 4 in 2013 is quite simply a poor product, dated and sluggish relative to other phones you could buy off-contract at the same price (and the iPhone 4 is a relatively expensive phone in these markets!). The iPhone 5C changes that.

They do make money on 30-pin, but it's legacy tech that Apple's trying to drop as fact as they can. Selling it is problematic for a number of reasons:

1) The longer accessories keep being made for 30-pin, the longer older devices stay relevant, and the longer customers can go without upgrading to a new model.

2) Accessory manufacturers will target the 30-pin connector over the Lightning connector because the Lightning customer base is smaller, and the sooner all products move to Lightning, the faster the market for Lightning accessories will grow, and more Lightning accessories makes newer phone models more attractive.

At present they only sell four products with it, and all of them are older products that you can bet your ass are all going away this year (with the single possible exception of the iPod classic, and if they can get a 128GB touch out even that might go out the window). The only reason they still sell those products is because

1) They sell the iPhone 4 and 4S because they don't have anything else to sell in their place, and the iPhone 5C will solve this problem.

2) They sell the iPad 2 because, for whatever reason, the iPad 2 keeps selling. Gruber speculated they kept it around after the iPad mini came out to determine if people are buying it just because it's the cheapest iPad, or the cheapest full-size iPad. In any case, it will undoubtedly be killed off by the end of the year and all iPads will also be on Lightning.

3) They sell the iPod classic because it fills a niche no other iPod currently does (tons of capacity), they don't have any other product to replace it, and it keeps selling, but it doesn't sell so much that keeping it on 30-pin significantly impacts their business and it would be more effort than it's worth to redesign it to use the Lightning connector.

Shit, the 4th gen iPad was rushed out the door in no small part to get the full-size iPad to use the Lightning connector (the A6X chip was a bonus due to dissatisfaction with the performance of the A5X). The 3rd gen iPad was selling just fine, by your logic they would've kept it around the full year because from a pure financial standpoint, there was no reason to replace it. But they didn't.

You are arguing out of both sides of your mouth if you think they are making it more appealing to the lower end while doing the same thing they've always been doing.

What I'm saying is the pricing isn't changing (or at least not as significantly as people speculate - $400 I could see, but no less than that). What is changing is that you get a much better product for that price than you would if they continued their model of selling older iPhones. They're making it more appealing to the low-end by making it a better phone, not a lower-cost phone.
 
iPhone 4 and 4S sell very well, but a great number of those units are in America where they're being heavily subsidized. They also do well in off-contract markets in China and India in no small part because Apple is offering specially-targeted pricing incentives there - rebates, installment plans. But they don't do as well as they could in these markets because the iPhone 4 in 2013 is quite simply a poor product, dated and sluggish relative to other phones you could buy off-contract at the same price (and the iPhone 4 is a relatively expensive phone in these markets!). The iPhone 5C changes that.

They do make money on 30-pin, but it's legacy tech that Apple's trying to drop as fact as they can. Selling it is problematic for a number of reasons:

1) The longer accessories keep being made for 30-pin, the longer older devices stay relevant, and the longer customers can go without upgrading to a new model.

2) Accessory manufacturers will target the 30-pin connector over the Lightning connector because the Lightning customer base is smaller, and the sooner all products move to Lightning, the faster the market for Lightning accessories will grow, and more Lightning accessories makes newer phone models more attractive.

At present they only sell four products with it, and all of them are older products that you can bet your ass are all going away this year (with the single possible exception of the iPod classic, and if they can get a 128GB touch out even that might go out the window). The only reason they still sell those products is because

1) They sell the iPhone 4 and 4S because they don't have anything else to sell in their place, and the iPhone 5C will solve this problem.

2) They sell the iPad 2 because, for whatever reason, the iPad 2 keeps selling. Gruber speculated they kept it around after the iPad mini came out to determine if people are buying it just because it's the cheapest iPad, or the cheapest full-size iPad. In any case, it will undoubtedly be killed off by the end of the year and all iPads will also be on Lightning.

3) They sell the iPod classic because it fills a niche no other iPod currently does (tons of capacity), they don't have any other product to replace it, and it keeps selling, but it doesn't sell so much that keeping it on 30-pin significantly impacts their business and it would be more effort than it's worth to redesign it to use the Lightning connector.

Shit, the 4th gen iPad was rushed out the door in no small part to get the full-size iPad to use the Lightning connector (the A6X chip was a bonus due to dissatisfaction with the performance of the A5X). The 3rd gen iPad was selling just fine, by your logic they would've kept it around the full year because from a pure financial standpoint, there was no reason to replace it. But they didn't.



What I'm saying is the pricing isn't changing (or at least not as significantly as people speculate - $400 I could see, but no less than that). What is changing is that you get a much better product for that price than you would if they continued their model of selling older iPhones. They're making it more appealing to the low-end by making it a better phone, not a lower-cost phone.

Under your above rationale, it behooves Apple to switch to a new connector constantly because it encourages people to upgrade. But I don't think it really encourages upgrades. Buying a Lightning device today does not encourage me to upgrade to a newer device any faster than buying a 30-pin device today.

If you see that it could be $400 and that it is designed to compete with other low-priced phones, than you're right in line with what many people are saying. It is not taking the place of the 4S as an afterthought, it is directly targeting that market.
 
A $400 LTE unlocked iPhone 5 sounds pretty cool, even if it is plastic. I wonder if they feel that competes with a potential Nexus 5 or they are different markets
 
The 5C / 5S situation is unprecedented to Apple. Never before have they had products that are essentially industrial design variants with minor spec differences. Always before the spec and positioning of the products have been very different.

Consider

MacBook Pro vs MacBook
iPod vs iPod Mini
iPad vs iPad Mini
Mac Pro vs iMac

The 5C and 5S are a completely different case. They have essentially same dimensions, same screen size, same interaction methods, same basic components aside from a couple minor details.

Like muddream wrote, it will be interesting to see how they position the 5C.

macbook-white-silver-unibody-compared.jpg
 
Honestly, I can understand the reactions, but 90% of the iPhones on the street already look pretty much like that.
 
blue_white_yellow_iphone_5c_packaged.jpg


I guess the big story here is matching iOS7 wallpapers!

They remind me of Windows phone now.

Unlike the other leaks of just case backs, this looks fake to me. the hideous colours of the wallpapers and the black front faces instead of white faces (like the ipod touches with colour backs).

something’s wrong here.
 
I dont understand the point of making a cheap phone that costs half a thousand dollars. I know it will still sell, but the thinking behind it is madness.

It's like
"Hey, let's make a new phone that's about $100 cheaper"
"whaaaaah? think of the profits we'll miss out on! Better make it out of dog shit, toilet paper and used chewing gum as adhesive."
 
I dont understand the point of making a cheap phone that costs half a thousand dollars. I know it will still sell, but the thinking behind it is madness.

It's like
"Hey, let's make a new phone that's about $100 cheaper"
"whaaaaah? think of the profits we'll miss out on! Better make it out of dog shit, toilet paper and used chewing gum as adhesive."

When all the rumors were firing up about a "cheaper iPhone", I think people didn't realize it probably meant "cheaper for Apple", not "cheaper for the consumer".
 
I dont understand the point of making a cheap phone that costs half a thousand dollars. I know it will still sell, but the thinking behind it is madness.

It's like
"Hey, let's make a new phone that's about $100 cheaper"
"whaaaaah? think of the profits we'll miss out on! Better make it out of dog shit, toilet paper and used chewing gum as adhesive."
All it's really about is making it so everyone has the tall screen and Lightning port. People are overthinking this.
 
I dont understand the point of making a cheap phone that costs half a thousand dollars. I know it will still sell, but the thinking behind it is madness.

It's like
"Hey, let's make a new phone that's about $100 cheaper"
"whaaaaah? think of the profits we'll miss out on! Better make it out of dog shit, toilet paper and used chewing gum as adhesive."

feature parity with the flagship but made out of shittier materials.
 
All it's really about is making it so everyone has the tall screen and Lightning port. People are overthinking this.
Ar you saying there will be the same amount of discussion about this as they do with the 4/3GS when they moved into the free on contract bracket (barely any mention)? I think you are underthinking how much they will emphasize and market this model.
 
I work for a service provider, and the iPhone 4 is still in high demand.

If this phone is 50$ on a 2 year contract (450$ subsidy), it will murder the mid range competition.
 
I work for a service provider, and the iPhone 4 is still in high demand.

If this phone is 50$ on a 2 year contract (450$ subsidy), it will murder the mid range competition.

That's the other thing. The cheap option for the iPhone was always buying an older model and those still sold by the boatloads. With the 5C, now Apple can give those consumers the perception that this is a NEW product, not just last year's model. I think that will spur sales even further.
 

I am shocked this got past their packaging design team. The icon set look horrible with the colored background. The black front looks meh.
Is it me or the colors they picked off?

I can only guess the background is there to illustrate the color, since the back of the phone is not seen. Packaging looks cheap as well. I think this is their first iPhone big MISS. Who am I to say though?
 
Why the heck haven't apple brought out a unibody iPhone?

All that faffing around from the 4 onwards would have been solved in one fail swoop. (Sic)
 
I am shocked this got past their packaging design team. The icon set look horrible with the colored background. The black front looks meh.
Is it me or the colors they picked off?

I can only guess the background is there to illustrate the color, since the back of the phone is not seen. Packaging looks cheap as well. I think this is their first iPhone big MISS. Who am I to say though?

Clearly aimed at teens and the iPod touch demographic.

If this is real, it is a really smart move.


Why the heck haven't apple brought out a unibody iPhone?

All that faffing around from the 4 onwards would have been solved in one fail swoop. (Sic)

The iPhone 5 is already kimda a unibody design.
 
I am shocked this got past their packaging design team. The icon set look horrible with the colored background. The black front looks meh.
Is it me or the colors they picked off?

I can only guess the background is there to illustrate the color, since the back of the phone is not seen. Packaging looks cheap as well. I think this is their first iPhone big MISS. Who am I to say though?

Lol this thing is gonna be huge for Tweens and teens. Can't wait for the initial sale numbers.
 
Yuck.

I wonder if the next generation iPod Touch will follow a similar road.

If so, it may be time to pull the trigger before the current stock runs out.

I hope they announce the next gen iPod touch at the iPhone event, the one now is going to be very outdated when iOS 7 hits :/
 
This isn't for me, but I'm sure as hell not writing it off.

The last time I did that was when they announced the iPod mini. "Who the hell wants to buy an iPod with a pissy little 4GB HDD for just $50 less and not that much smaller than a 15GB full iPod? Just because it comes in a pink case?"

Turns out it was LOTS OF PEOPLE.

iphone-5c-pink.jpg


People are seeing cheap plastic here, all I'm seeing are pink iPhones.
 
Oh look, these unflattering leaked pictures make this product look bad. Shocking.

They do need white faceplates though, but I guess that's for 2nd gen.
 
Unlike the other leaks of just case backs, this looks fake to me. the hideous colours of the wallpapers and the black front faces instead of white faces (like the ipod touches with colour backs).

something’s wrong here.

A photoshop with so many phones in different angles and distance from the camera is almost impossible. This has to be real.
 
Btw, can the unveiling really be on September 10th? Wouldn't they have sent out invitations by now? It's a week left.
 
Btw, can the unveiling really be on September 10th? Wouldn't they have sent out invitations by now? It's a week left.
Usually they send them out literally one week before. So, tomorrow.

http://cdn-static.cnet.co.uk/i/c/blg/cat/mobiles/iphone-5c-pink.jpg

People are seeing cheap plastic here, all I'm seeing are pink iPhones.[/QUOTE]

And I'm seeing hot cakes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom