These cheap iPhones look so bad they will not move in the Euro/Chinese markets.
I wish there is a word for "Fisher Price", because calling them "ShanZhai" would be giving them credit.
Xiaomi Mi2 looks basically the same and sells pretty well.
These cheap iPhones look so bad they will not move in the Euro/Chinese markets.
I wish there is a word for "Fisher Price", because calling them "ShanZhai" would be giving them credit.
And it'll be a long time before that happens again, from apple or anyone else.I still remember when iPhone 4 came out and obliterated everything. It has been awhile since we saw anything like that.
The iPhone 4S is already competitive at $550, they were about 30% of iPhone sales last quarter. LTE is a non-factor in most of the markets Apple sells in. It is still an appealing design. The iPhone 4 with the same design also did well. They make money on 30 pin accessories just as well as Lightning accessories, which is why they still sell iPads, iPods and iPhones with the connector for the past year.
You are arguing out of both sides of your mouth if you think they are making it more appealing to the lower end while doing the same thing they've always been doing.
iPhone 4 and 4S sell very well, but a great number of those units are in America where they're being heavily subsidized. They also do well in off-contract markets in China and India in no small part because Apple is offering specially-targeted pricing incentives there - rebates, installment plans. But they don't do as well as they could in these markets because the iPhone 4 in 2013 is quite simply a poor product, dated and sluggish relative to other phones you could buy off-contract at the same price (and the iPhone 4 is a relatively expensive phone in these markets!). The iPhone 5C changes that.
They do make money on 30-pin, but it's legacy tech that Apple's trying to drop as fact as they can. Selling it is problematic for a number of reasons:
1) The longer accessories keep being made for 30-pin, the longer older devices stay relevant, and the longer customers can go without upgrading to a new model.
2) Accessory manufacturers will target the 30-pin connector over the Lightning connector because the Lightning customer base is smaller, and the sooner all products move to Lightning, the faster the market for Lightning accessories will grow, and more Lightning accessories makes newer phone models more attractive.
At present they only sell four products with it, and all of them are older products that you can bet your ass are all going away this year (with the single possible exception of the iPod classic, and if they can get a 128GB touch out even that might go out the window). The only reason they still sell those products is because
1) They sell the iPhone 4 and 4S because they don't have anything else to sell in their place, and the iPhone 5C will solve this problem.
2) They sell the iPad 2 because, for whatever reason, the iPad 2 keeps selling. Gruber speculated they kept it around after the iPad mini came out to determine if people are buying it just because it's the cheapest iPad, or the cheapest full-size iPad. In any case, it will undoubtedly be killed off by the end of the year and all iPads will also be on Lightning.
3) They sell the iPod classic because it fills a niche no other iPod currently does (tons of capacity), they don't have any other product to replace it, and it keeps selling, but it doesn't sell so much that keeping it on 30-pin significantly impacts their business and it would be more effort than it's worth to redesign it to use the Lightning connector.
Shit, the 4th gen iPad was rushed out the door in no small part to get the full-size iPad to use the Lightning connector (the A6X chip was a bonus due to dissatisfaction with the performance of the A5X). The 3rd gen iPad was selling just fine, by your logic they would've kept it around the full year because from a pure financial standpoint, there was no reason to replace it. But they didn't.
What I'm saying is the pricing isn't changing (or at least not as significantly as people speculate - $400 I could see, but no less than that). What is changing is that you get a much better product for that price than you would if they continued their model of selling older iPhones. They're making it more appealing to the low-end by making it a better phone, not a lower-cost phone.
I am not sure where to ask this but what are the odds of a new macbook air announcement?
I am not sure where to ask this but what are the odds of a new macbook air announcement?
The 5C / 5S situation is unprecedented to Apple. Never before have they had products that are essentially industrial design variants with minor spec differences. Always before the spec and positioning of the products have been very different.
Consider
MacBook Pro vs MacBook
iPod vs iPod Mini
iPad vs iPad Mini
Mac Pro vs iMac
The 5C and 5S are a completely different case. They have essentially same dimensions, same screen size, same interaction methods, same basic components aside from a couple minor details.
Like muddream wrote, it will be interesting to see how they position the 5C.
![]()
I guess the big story here is matching iOS7 wallpapers!
They remind me of Windows phone now.
![]()
I guess the big story here is matching iOS7 wallpapers!
They remind me of Windows phone now.
![]()
I guess the big story here is matching iOS7 wallpapers!
They remind me of Windows phone now.
I dont understand the point of making a cheap phone that costs half a thousand dollars. I know it will still sell, but the thinking behind it is madness.
It's like
"Hey, let's make a new phone that's about $100 cheaper"
"whaaaaah? think of the profits we'll miss out on! Better make it out of dog shit, toilet paper and used chewing gum as adhesive."
All it's really about is making it so everyone has the tall screen and Lightning port. People are overthinking this.I dont understand the point of making a cheap phone that costs half a thousand dollars. I know it will still sell, but the thinking behind it is madness.
It's like
"Hey, let's make a new phone that's about $100 cheaper"
"whaaaaah? think of the profits we'll miss out on! Better make it out of dog shit, toilet paper and used chewing gum as adhesive."
I dont understand the point of making a cheap phone that costs half a thousand dollars. I know it will still sell, but the thinking behind it is madness.
It's like
"Hey, let's make a new phone that's about $100 cheaper"
"whaaaaah? think of the profits we'll miss out on! Better make it out of dog shit, toilet paper and used chewing gum as adhesive."
Ar you saying there will be the same amount of discussion about this as they do with the 4/3GS when they moved into the free on contract bracket (barely any mention)? I think you are underthinking how much they will emphasize and market this model.All it's really about is making it so everyone has the tall screen and Lightning port. People are overthinking this.
I work for a service provider, and the iPhone 4 is still in high demand.
If this phone is 50$ on a 2 year contract (450$ subsidy), it will murder the mid range competition.
I am shocked this got past their packaging design team. The icon set look horrible with the colored background. The black front looks meh.
Is it me or the colors they picked off?
I can only guess the background is there to illustrate the color, since the back of the phone is not seen. Packaging looks cheap as well. I think this is their first iPhone big MISS. Who am I to say though?
Why the heck haven't apple brought out a unibody iPhone?
All that faffing around from the 4 onwards would have been solved in one fail swoop. (Sic)
I am shocked this got past their packaging design team. The icon set look horrible with the colored background. The black front looks meh.
Is it me or the colors they picked off?
I can only guess the background is there to illustrate the color, since the back of the phone is not seen. Packaging looks cheap as well. I think this is their first iPhone big MISS. Who am I to say though?
Yuck.
I wonder if the next generation iPod Touch will follow a similar road.
If so, it may be time to pull the trigger before the current stock runs out.
Unlike the other leaks of just case backs, this looks fake to me. the hideous colours of the wallpapers and the black front faces instead of white faces (like the ipod touches with colour backs).
somethings wrong here.
Usually they send them out literally one week before. So, tomorrow.Btw, can the unveiling really be on September 10th? Wouldn't they have sent out invitations by now? It's a week left.
http://cdn-static.cnet.co.uk/i/c/blg/cat/mobiles/iphone-5c-pink.jpg
People are seeing cheap plastic here, all I'm seeing are pink iPhones.[/QUOTE]
And I'm seeing hot cakes.
iPhone 3 had plastic, don't see the issue.
![]()
Still the most comfortable iPhone in the hand.iPhone 3 had plastic, don't see the issue.
![]()
iPhone 3 had plastic, don't see the issue.
![]()
iPhone 3 had plastic, don't see the issue.
![]()