S4. Although I have Nexus 4.Okay guys, simple question. HTC One X or this?
S4. Although I have Nexus 4.Okay guys, simple question. HTC One X or this?
I thought this had been a non-issue since Jelly Bean.
Okay guys, simple question. HTC One X or this?
"Instead of still selling the 4S, we want everyone to have the tall screen and lightning connector." That's all this is.I wonder what the official smug Apple justification for this device's existence will be. They've never officially had a "we've lowered our standards for our poverty-stricken customers" device before, but there's no obvious form-factor cop-out with the 5C.
"Instead of still selling the 4S, we want everyone to have the tall screen and lightning connector." That's all this is.
Okay guys, simple question. HTC One X or this?
I wonder what the official smug Apple justification for this device's existence will be. They've never officially had a "we've lowered our standards for our poverty-stricken customers" device before, but there's no obvious form-factor cop-out with the 5C.
The problem there is the iPhone 5. You basically will have 5S which will be the next big shiny thing, then 5 which will be last year's model decreased in value and then 5C. Now the 5C seems to be replacing 5 but then that would suggest that 4S will still stick around. If 5C replaces 4S then 5 would logically still had to be produced but that doesn't seem to be the case going by the reports. So you're creating a gap in the portfolio."Instead of still selling the 4S, we want everyone to have the tall screen and lightning connector." That's all this is.
Also, the 5C will supposedly come in a myriad of colours.
![]()
The problem there is the iPhone 5. You basically will have 5S which will be the next big shiny thing, then 5 which will be last year's model decreased in value and then 5C. Now the 5C seems to be replacing 5 but then that would suggest that 4S will still stick around. If 5C replaces 4S then 5 would logically still had to be produced but that doesn't seem to be the case going by the reports. So you're creating a gap in the portfolio.
I wonder what the official smug Apple justification for this device's existence will be. They've never officially had a "we've lowered our standards for our poverty-stricken customers" device before, but there's no obvious form-factor cop-out with the 5C.
I like the colours but it looks kinda cheap. Like a toy or something. I think it's the way the edges curve and the kind of plastic it looks to be made of.
The problem there is the iPhone 5. You basically will have 5S which will be the next big shiny thing, then 5 which will be last year's model decreased in value and then 5C. Now the 5C seems to be replacing 5 but then that would suggest that 4S will still stick around. If 5C replaces 4S then 5 would logically still had to be produced but that doesn't seem to be the case going by the reports. So you're creating a gap in the portfolio.
Aren't those metal? Looks much nicer than the cheapo plastic.
Web showered in golden iPhone 5S vid glory - but is it all a DISTRACTION?
I would love it if all these leaks were wrong, and Apple pulled out something completely different. I won't happen, but it'd be funny.
It would be amazing!I would love it if all these leaks were wrong, and Apple pulled out something completely different. I won't happen, but it'd be funny.
I would love it if all these leaks were wrong, and Apple pulled out something completely different. I won't happen, but it'd be funny.
I would love it if all these leaks were wrong, and Apple pulled out something completely different. I won't happen, but it'd be funny.
When I see people with iPhone/iPad cases with a hole to show the apple logo I kinda want to punch them in the face.People will buy it. Why? Because it's Apple and it has a logo on the back of it, that's why.
I believe there were just rumours of apple making a PDA or a continuation of the Newton. This was when creative and Rio were making groundsYeah, it's not like the original iPhone where they kept it secret by not sending it to the FCC until after it was revealed and launched it like 6 months later. Up until that reveal, it was still just the same silly Apple Phone rumor people had been spouting for years.
And did anyone see the original iPod coming?
I don't think the 5C will ever be that cheap, even with a 3 year it'll be $250 minimum. This is Apple we're talking about.I think it will be this
5S - gold or graphite 32gb/64gb/128gb 199/299/399
5C - 8gb/16gb free/99$
The 5 goes away.
The 5S I can see. But I only want to believe they'd make the low end 32GB. I mean they only recently got rid of the 8GB models for the high end. 16GB is the most I've ever had. And the lowest you can get now.I think it will be this
5S - gold or graphite 32gb/64gb/128gb 199/299/399
5C - 8gb/16gb free/99$
The 5 goes away.
So a good price will really make all the difference here. $300 at most for at least the bottom one will work.
The 5C isn't a flagship though. That's the whole point of it existing. Hence the removal of aluminum for plastic and older processors and probably lesser cameras and stuff.It won't be $300. Even flagship Xiaomi phones are over $300.
The 5C / 5S situation is unprecedented to Apple. Never before have they had products that are essentially industrial design variants with minor spec differences. Always before the spec and positioning of the products have been very different.
Consider
MacBook Pro vs MacBook
iPod vs iPod Mini
iPad vs iPad Mini
Mac Pro vs iMac
The 5C and 5S are a completely different case. They have essentially same dimensions, same screen size, same interaction methods, same basic components aside from a couple minor details.
Like muddream wrote, it will be interesting to see how they position the 5C.
The 5C isn't a flagship though. That's the whole point of it existing. Hence the removal of aluminum for plastic and older processors and probably lesser cameras and stuff.
You want a flagship iPhone, you get the iPhone 5S. Not the 5C.
Is that subsidized or unsubsidized?Yes, but they want to compete with flagship Xiaomi phones, which sell for $320 or so.
Unsubsidized.Is that subsidized or unsubsidized?
Kay. Maybe the 5C will be $400. I dunno. I don't care. I just want it to be the 10th already. I hate this long period between rumors and release where it's all speculating and you just want it to happen already so people can move on to bitching about why it's not what they wanted.Unsubsidized.
You think the 5C will be 250 on contract?I don't think the 5C will ever be that cheap, even with a 3 year it'll be $250 minimum. This is Apple we're talking about.
The 5C is designed to take the low-end spot in Apple's lineup that the 4 currently occupies and that the 4S would hypothetically occupy after the 5S comes out, for the sake of getting every iOS device on a 4-inch screen and a Lightning connector with LTE. It's not designed to compete on off-contract price against Xiaomi phones or whatever the hell is being speculated.
The iPhone 4 has been competing in that off-contract space. That's why it's been supply constrained recently despite being over 2 years old.
I think they will make it to be a bigger deal than just saying "this now occupies the 4S space." That's why there are the colors and all the speculation about a cheap price.
I don't think it will compete in the under $300 range, but every analyst from Gruber to Horace Dediu to Benedict Evans is saying it will be lower than the current iPhone 4 price of $450.It's been competing in the off-contract space to an extent purely because it's the cheapest iPhone off-contract, but certainly they haven't been trying to compete in the $300-or-less price range people keep speculating the 5C will hit, and I don't expect that to change.
The reason for the colors is so that they have something positive to differentiate it from the iPhone 5 instead of just being a shittier model. "Sure, it's an iPhone 5 in a cheaper case, but it comes in ~colors~!".
Why didn't they differentiate the 3GS and iPhone 4 when they were sold as cheaper models at $450?
Because selling old models as cheaper models was practically an after-thought. They were never trying to push hard into the low-end part of the market, they just figured it's fairly cheap and easy to offer last year's model as a cheap alternative to the new one. Now they've realized that A) lots of people are buying those old phones, B) the iPhone 4S isn't going to be very competitive with $400 Android phones, especially without LTE, C) it would seriously suck for Apple if they kept selling devices with a 3.5" screen for another year (which means having to support that size in iOS for another year) and the 30-pin connector (which means slower adoption of Lightning by both customers and accessory makers). So they've realized it makes a lot of sense to design a phone specifically for that part of the market, and differentiating a lower-end product with color options to make it more appealing is common practice for Apple (see: iPods).
The iPhone 4S is already competitive at $550, they were about 30% of iPhone sales last quarter. LTE is a non-factor in most of the markets Apple sells in. It is still an appealing design. The iPhone 4 with the same design also did well. They make money on 30 pin accessories just as well as Lightning accessories, which is why they still sell iPads, iPods and iPhones with the connector for the past year.
You are arguing out of both sides of your mouth if you think they are making it more appealing to the lower end while doing the same thing they've always been doing.
The US market is already oversaturated and iPhone has a commanding share. This is targeted more towards European and Chinese markets.