Professor who predicted recession says we are still screwed.

Status
Not open for further replies.
SpeedingUptoStop said:
I think anybody actually paying attention could've predicted this recession, so this guy really isn't special at all to me.
Just about every Economist worth his title was predicting a buble in the housing market. I remember people selling there property in 07 because of the predictions.
 
One of the bigger problems in my eyes is the rate at which companies can ship jobs overseas. What we really need is a new 'boom' industry to shake things up like the tech sector, but even if we do get it, it'll only provide jobs for about 4 or 5 years until cheaper foreign countries can become competent, and oops, there goes the jobs again.
 
This isn't good

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100131/ap_on_bi_ge/us_bailout_watchdog

The government's response to the financial meltdown has made it more likely the United States will face a deeper crisis in the future, an independent watchdog at the Treasury Department warned.

The problems that led to the last crisis have not yet been addressed, and in some cases have grown worse, says Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the trouble asset relief program, or TARP. The quarterly report to Congress was released Sunday.

"Even if TARP saved our financial system from driving off a cliff back in 2008, absent meaningful reform, we are still driving on the same winding mountain road, but this time in a faster car," Barofsky wrote.

Since Congress passed $700 billion financial bailout, the remaining institutions considered "too big to fail" have grown larger and failed to restrain the lavish pay for their executives, Barofsky wrote. He said the banks still have an incentive to take on risk because they know the government will save them rather than bring down the financial system.

Barofsky also said his office is investigating 77 cases of possible criminal and civil fraud, including crimes of tax evasion, insider trading, mortgage lending and payment collection, false statements and public corruption.
 
kevm3 said:
One of the bigger problems in my eyes is the rate at which companies can ship jobs overseas. What we really need is a new 'boom' industry to shake things up like the tech sector, but even if we do get it, it'll only provide jobs for about 4 or 5 years until cheaper foreign countries can become competent, and oops, there goes the jobs again.
agreed. America is becoming a nation of middle managers because they've outsourced almost everything else. But now companies are realizing that if there's no one to manage why have middle management?

First it was manufacturing cause it was easy.

Then came the tech boom.

Then it was HR and operations.
Then it was QA
Then basic tech support
Then whole IT groups
Then product development and engineering
Now we're to small sections of marketing and sales. After which, well, what's really left?

Companies are in a race to the bottom line. We're getting there. Fact is the people at the top make more and more while everyone else keeps getting squeezed. It's not healthy or sustainable. It's one thing for the country to lose jobs that were unskilled but we've been losing jobs that require bachelors and master degrees for years now, you can't reasonably expect these workers to get retrained, they're already tens of thousands in the whole on their education.

Since Reagan we've been too in love with this serf/lord relationship and have forgotten that business is supposed to serve us, not the other way around. But then, that's a lesson America forgot decades ago, if it ever learned it.
 
zerostackers said:
it's not that we're never going to recover, it's that we never properly bottomed out. if aig had been allowed to implode, causing a collapse of the world's largest financial solutions.. so what? it would have cost us taxpayers about the same, but all that money wouldn't have gone straight into bankers' pockets. it would have gone into new lending facilities to replace what vanished - and with fannie, freddie and fha taking such a huge role now, we basically did that anyway, so why the fuck are we paying all these idiots for not originating mortgages?

i don't believe for a fraction of second that any of these institutions were too big to fail. the executives just had the right politicians on their payroll to save them so they could justify another eight-digit bonus - on the basis that he got washington in his back pocket to save the company from going under.

I agree with this mostly. I said from day one to let them all fail. Can't run a business properly? Not my problem. You gotta declare bankruptcy. That's life. Capitalism.

We would have hit the bottom faster that way. Now we just have to float our way to the bottom, causing trillion dollar deficits, and making the economic hit that much longer and nagging.
 
I agree 100% that we should've just let most of these shitty companies fail.

For one, most of them add no real value. They are fucking paper companies.

Second, while having them fail would have hurt, it would put us all on a better track for the long-term. The shitty businesses would have failed. The truly strong ones would've picked up the pieces. As it stands, the shitty businesses are still here and have no incentive to be more careful; the lesson learned is this: "Want to take a risk? Do it. The government has your back!"

Third, shit stills sucks even WITH them bailed out, AND we now are trillions more in debt. Fucking fantastic.

Finally, the idea that you can "spend" your way out of this is fucking ridiculous. I don't know where the idea comes from, but it makes no sense whatsoever. It simply delays the inevitable.
 
Economic protectionism (read: a repudiation of globalism) is the ONLY way that this country's economic situation will improve appreciably. Too bad our politicians are more beholden to corporate interests than, you know, the interests of the people whom they're actually supposed to serve. Globalism is a sham perpetuated by moneyed interests, for moneyed interests. The highminded, egalitarian rhetoric tossed around regarding it is merely a smokescreen generated by the rich and powerful to cover up for an enormous transfer of wealth. The sooner people realize this, the better. Shame they won't, because they've bought the rhetoric hook, line, and sinker even as their quality of life has been eroded.
 
BastardTrees said:
Pack your bags grab a gun and join the military.

it's the only place hiring to be honest. :lol

3 squares a day and a gun.

what more could you want?

You know, I'm actually considering it since I can go in as an Officer now...If none of my current job prospects turn out, I'm going to get in touch with a Marine recruiter.
 
loosus said:
I agree 100% that we should've just let most of these shitty companies fail.

For one, most of them add no real value. They are fucking paper companies.

They add no real value...except that if they had failed, most of us wouldn't have had jobs the next week.

The real problem is that we saved them and yet Congress -- and the American people, quite frankly -- are willing to let them get away with what amounts to a slap on the wrist. IMO, it's okay that we saved them; it wasn't only in their best interest, it was also in the interest of every single middle-class working American to bail them out. The problem is that it seems so distant and removed now, that it's hard to get the people worked up about it and to drive the true reforms that we need to ensure that we don't relapse.

There is little populist support for strong financial reform and stricter restraints around risk taking. There is little populist support for increasing taxation on the huge bonuses paid on Wall Street or outright capping of executive pay as a % of average employee pay. People are upset that we bailed these companies out, and yet they are revolted by any mention of federal regulation and wave their hands shouting about "Communism!" and "Socialism!".
 
kevm3 said:
America is in big trouble, especially due to the fact that we make nothing. What do we export? Services? What's especially troubling is that we are missing out on a ton of manufacturing 'know-how', since all of the foreigners are getting the experience. People thought their 'degreed jobs' would be safe and that you would merely have to be reeducated, but honestly, if the corporations could ship your jobs overseas to save a significant buck, they would have, and we're going to start seeing more of that now.


We are all dumber for having to endure reading that. I'm taking it from your response here and responses later you probably got laid off for being non adaptive or some shit. There are a metric fucktonload of IT jobs in the US. Even during the boom of the recession my company was hiring as were many other companies around us.

The US also controls half the world's grain exports, we are also a major exporter of soy and other agricultural goods. Our exports annually are over 1 trillion dollars. I know it's the internet where any idiot can say whatever he likes but you're just completely ignorant. The fact that once the US hit a recession it quickly spidered out into a global recession speaks volumes for how much of a major player we are in the global economy. I know everyone thinks the US is the only place being hit by this but France and Spain are being hit much, much harder.
 
BastardTrees said:
Pack your bags grab a gun and join the military.

it's the only place hiring to be honest. :lol

3 squares a day and a gun.

what more could you want?

As far as the Navy goes, no they aren't.

Last 2 months, I believe most of the recruitments offices of zone 2 of south florida were told that they didn't need to recruit anyone. Not only that, I've heard that they also raised the test scores to get in...

Also, the Air Force has a estimated waiting time of over 1 year, that means that although you are tied by contract to them (report every week, exercise, and leave whenever needed), they don't pay you til you set foot on bootcamp.

Meaning that you still need to find another job :lol
 
We need to stop caring about propping up a housing bubble or propping up stocks numbers on wall street. We need to eliminate the housing tax credit and create major incentives for starting a small business and hiring people. This won't benefit wall street, but fuck them. This is about jobs not stock prices. Huge consumerism will come back once people are comfortably employed again and don't fear that if they lose their job they won't be able to find a new one.
 
the three rules about predicting in economics

1. economists can't predict anything

2. no one else can predict anything neither

3. if you predict something enough times you will eventually be right
 
Hari Seldon said:
He is right about the recovery number. It is all about inventory, it is not a real sustainable growth number.


So what about the quarter before that?
 
The stock markets are going up while unemployment is rising and business are still closing.
Production is going down while the exchange is going up.

A bubble in the making.

People seriously need to riot and take these inept politicians and businessmen to the gallows.
We need a purge French and ancient Roman style.
 
nubbe said:
The stock markets are going up while unemployment are rising and business are still closing.
Production is going down while the exchange is going up.

A bubble in the making.

People seriously need to riot and take these inept politicians and businessmen to the gallows.
We need a purge French and ancient Roman style.


WTF are you talking about? Riot for what? And I just saw today that production is going up.
 
Blablurn said:
where are the good times? i miss them.
Things are not going to be better, only worse in the next decades.
Inflation is going to kick in, and I believe a dollar crisis will throw the USA into a 2nd world country status. Europe isn't going to be much better off.
The Economy now is in a worse shape then before the recession started.
 
Stock market's up almost 100 points today; where is this little bitch now?

Disney-Chicken-Little-Sky-Falling.jpg
 
ToxicAdam said:
I think the last 60 years of American history prove you wrong on that.
Yeah, the last 60 years didn't have to deal with globalization & imports. That only got big in the last 30 years and during that time period we were on a slow slide downward.

And now the effects of racking up endless trade deficits is hitting.
 
ksan said:
the three rules about predicting in economics

1. economists can't predict anything

2. no one else can predict anything neither

3. if you predict something enough times you will eventually be right

4. But just because you are right a few times doesn't mean you'll be right again.
 
ksan said:
the three rules about predicting in economics

1. economists can't predict anything

2. no one else can predict anything neither

3. if you predict something enough times you will eventually be right

This crisis was easy to predict it would happen.
Only the timeframe is hard to predict.
 
ksan said:
the three rules about predicting in economics

1. economists can't predict anything

2. no one else can predict anything neither

3. if you predict something enough times you will eventually be right

Love it when GAF pretends as if they are economists. The truth is this: 99% of you have no idea what you are talking about, and neither do I.
 
Think about this:

Right before the market crashed, there were very few warnings. Albeit there were some, but they didn't make headlines until it was too late.
Now that the market has recovered, there are tons of headlines saying "the worst is yet to come", creating a climate of caution and worry for the average consumer.

People who are in the know don't give their info out for free on blogs or forums. They are in the top floor of their corporation sitting in front of a beautiful $20,000 Teak wood desk signing contract extensions with a $2500 Montblanc pen. They make more money for themselves and their company than 50,000 Google ad hits could ever make on a blog site.
 
Jak140 said:
?

You mean a broken clock, right?

Yeah.

I could pretend it had some kind of esoteric hidden meaning, but in reality I made the mistake of posting after some sleeping pills were kicking in. :lol

The media loves pulling these stories out whenever the market drops like it did last week.
 
ToxicAdam said:
I think the last 60 years of American history prove you wrong on that.

Economics is a long term study, and long term evidence proves that labor jobs are low class jobs.

The post WWII middle class bubble was caused by a short term irregularity in the balance of trade, which is now correcting.
 
Gallbaro said:
Economics is a long term study, and long term evidence proves that labor jobs are low class jobs.

The post WWII middle class bubble was caused by a short term irregularity in the balance of trade, which is now correcting.
Shame though that for economists long term means "the last 5 years".
 
silentspork said:
Love it when GAF pretends as if they are economists. The truth is this: 99% of you have no idea what you are talking about, and neither do I.
That's probably why they're so effective at pretending to be economists.

I'm thinking that stocks are recovering because of the Darwinian nature of this recession. Natural selection has eliminated most of the incompetent people, and the government bailed out the rest.
 
Have we actually figured out what we're going to do about foreclosures of the past and the ones to come thanks to the unemployment rate? To me it seems like we just ignored the issue and the cause of the crash just like we're ignoring the never-ending worthless wars of the past 10 years.
Have we done anything about the debt issue in america? I'm referring to the government's AND debts of the average middle and lower class america?
Have we done anything about the fact that america doesn't make anything anymore?
Have we done anything about the ever-stretching difference between middle class and upper class america?
Have we done anything about the increase in price in healthcare and education over the years?

And by "we" I mean anyone...the private sector, public...anyone.

Have anyone given me any reason to invest a dime in this country? Does our future look promising...where's the growth going to be? The tech age is slowing. The art age is long gone. It's all about production now. cheap vast production. That's not our thing. At best, we're gonna stay afloat in my eyes.
 
You can cherrypick the economists that predicted this, and if your favorite economist isn't there, you can lie and add them later. *cough* Paul Krugman *cough*
 
BastardTrees said:
Pack your bags grab a gun and join the military.

it's the only place hiring to be honest. :lol

3 squares a day and a gun.

what more could you want?
Not to be shot at. Or blown up.

I've been considering it though, out of desperation.
 
This will just lead to the inevitable uprising of other nations into superpower positions.

I believe its true though, doesnt seem like companies are taking massive strives to fix the problem, rather they are just putting a bandage over it.
 
I predicted the recession every time I saw an idiot towing a boat in a jacked F250 with spinners while he worked as a warehouse manager.

You didn't need to be a professor to note that italian granite slab and a subzero range is not necessary for a $90k condo's kitchen.
 
Mr. B Natural said:
Have we actually figured out what we're going to do about foreclosures of the past and the ones to come thanks to the unemployment rate?


Basically it's all being swept under the rug to be dealt with later. Thriving banks are encouraged (coerced?) into sucking up the bad debt of failed banks, the government program has helped a whopping 100 homes (out of 400,000), but has fended off banks from seizing the homes of many more, Ginnie Mae is now picking up where Fannie/Freddie left off, reverse mortages are exploding and hiding a lot of the problems among seniors citizens.


That's as deep as I looked before I became too depressed to press on.
 
CharlieDigital said:
They add no real value...except that if they had failed, most of us wouldn't have had jobs the next week.

The real problem is that we saved them and yet Congress -- and the American people, quite frankly -- are willing to let them get away with what amounts to a slap on the wrist. IMO, it's okay that we saved them; it wasn't only in their best interest, it was also in the interest of every single middle-class working American to bail them out. The problem is that it seems so distant and removed now, that it's hard to get the people worked up about it and to drive the true reforms that we need to ensure that we don't relapse.

There is little populist support for strong financial reform and stricter restraints around risk taking. There is little populist support for increasing taxation on the huge bonuses paid on Wall Street or outright capping of executive pay as a % of average employee pay. People are upset that we bailed these companies out, and yet they are revolted by any mention of federal regulation and wave their hands shouting about "Communism!" and "Socialism!".

This is almost exactly my position on the whole debacle. The ripple effect of letting those banks fail would have been astounding. But God damn did we miss the boat on financial reform. Now instead of people bitching about how the banks need to be kept in check (which they clearly should be), they're complaining the gov't shouldn't have stepped in and provided TARP (see this thread). Nevermind that TARP will mostly be repaid to the gov't.
 
Mr. B Natural said:
Have we actually figured out what we're going to do about foreclosures of the past and the ones to come thanks to the unemployment rate? To me it seems like we just ignored the issue and the cause of the crash just like we're ignoring the never-ending worthless wars of the past 10 years.
Have we done anything about the debt issue in america? I'm referring to the government's AND debts of the average middle and lower class america?
Have we done anything about the fact that america doesn't make anything anymore?
Have we done anything about the ever-stretching difference between middle class and upper class america?
Have we done anything about the increase in price in healthcare and education over the years?

And by "we" I mean anyone...the private sector, public...anyone.

Have anyone given me any reason to invest a dime in this country? Does our future look promising...where's the growth going to be? The tech age is slowing. The art age is long gone. It's all about production now. cheap vast production. That's not our thing. At best, we're gonna stay afloat in my eyes.
American laws are favorable to entrepreneurship, so there's that.
 
I don't like how this imply that this wasn't something most decent Econ professors didn't see coming.
 
Loki said:
Economic protectionism (read: a repudiation of globalism) is the ONLY way that this country's economic situation will improve appreciably. Too bad our politicians are more beholden to corporate interests than, you know, the interests of the people whom they're actually supposed to serve. Globalism is a sham perpetuated by moneyed interests, for moneyed interests. The highminded, egalitarian rhetoric tossed around regarding it is merely a smokescreen generated by the rich and powerful to cover up for an enormous transfer of wealth. The sooner people realize this, the better. Shame they won't, because they've bought the rhetoric hook, line, and sinker even as their quality of life has been eroded.


I think this is probably basically true. Undoubtedly, implementing a greater level of protectionism would cause problems initially (because our system would sort of crumble for a while). in the long term, I think we would be better off.

Other countries certainly seem to protect their jobs a lot more aggressively than we do.

I come from the rural south where NAFTA has left a huge hole that hasn't really even been filled. People that used to have good paying factory jobs are now working as cashiers for minimum wage, or they're unemployed, or they've found some other shitty way to keep themselves fed, but they aren't nearly as well off as they used to be. We were already having problems here before the recession hit, and now they're just worse.

Globalization may have initially helped a lot in some parts of the country, but it certainly didn't help here, and it looks like it's starting to hurt everybody else too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom