StuBurns said:
I think both graphically and in terms of level design FO3 is way better. Certainly in terms of gunplay Rage is the best of the three, but that's hardly surprising.
Definitely can't agree with that.
The level design in Rage is so much more interesting and distinct than Fallout 3. Many of the areas in Fallout almost feel as if they were dynamically generated while the levels in Rage all feel carefully hand crafted. They are so much more interesting to play through as a result. Fallout 3 still works great as it is an RPG first and foremost, but aside from the overworld (which is nice), every other area you explore feels pretty generic.
Graphically, I don't think there is any comparison. On the PC, I suppose it would be closer, but I still favor Rage overall, but on consoles there is no context. Fallout 3 chugs on both consoles while Rage pushes a smooth 60 fps 99% of the time. The more intricate scenery running at such a fast framerate really looks fantastic to me.
I'm watching this video in 720p to see if I could tolerate the pop-in but I just don't see it.
Is it the usual gaf hyperbole? because even when the guy is riding through the Wastelands I still don't see it :\
While exploring the Wastelands, if you stop and do 180 turns, you can easily notice it. However, while playing, it really isn't all that prevalent or noticeable.