I beat the game with a 4890 so I'm going to say no.Brandon F said:So as an AMD 4890 owner I guess it's 360 recommended then?
I beat the game with a 4890 so I'm going to say no.Brandon F said:So as an AMD 4890 owner I guess it's 360 recommended then?
I commited suicide after a few minutes. Saving this level for tomorrow.StuBurns said:That's my next level, just the bridge to get to the door was pretty damn impressive.
I've got an 4890, runs very well and looks all good.Brandon F said:So as an AMD 4890 owner I guess it's 360 recommended then?
Metal-Geo said:Sweet mother of God. Jackal Canyon is perhaps the most beautiful level I've ever seen in a first person shooter. And the pacing is terrific.
Don't think I've ever loved a FPS more. <3
CozMick said:Hmmm UE3 is infamous for texture pop-in...
Every single UE3 game I have ever played has had texture pop-in, sometimes really horrific examples like Gears 1,2 and sometimes 3.
Zefah said:Jackal Canyon was probably my favorite level in the game. The train station and prison levels were also very good.
I agree that the pacing/flow are very good in the "dungeons", but feel that the overall pacing of the game taken as a whole is quite uneven.Solo said:Layout, art direction, encounters, and most important of all, pacing/flow, which is what id excels at.
Solo said:I have only reached, but not yet played Jackal Canyon. Best mission so far without a shadow of a doubt so far is the Blue Line Station. Pure carnage.
TheMan said:So forgive my ignorance (haven't really been into pc games for years now), but does this game stand a chance of dethroning crysis as the king of pc graphics?
I personally think that The Witcher 2 dethroned Crysis quite a while ago, and that Rage is more impressive than TW2 in terms of aesthetics. Rage feels like concept art in motion with the game mechanics of a highly refined shooter dropped into it.TheMan said:So forgive my ignorance (haven't really been into pc games for years now), but does this game stand a chance of dethroning crysis as the king of pc graphics?
TheMan said:So forgive my ignorance (haven't really been into pc games for years now), but does this game stand a chance of dethroning crysis as the king of pc graphics?
TheMan said:So forgive my ignorance (haven't really been into pc games for years now), but does this game stand a chance of dethroning crysis as the king of pc graphics?
Zefah said:You may as well be comparing Myst to DOOM. Sure Myst presents a much prettier picture, but it's all pre-rendered.
3chopl0x said:On a technical level, hell no. One could argue however that it is more aesthetically pleasing.
Zefah said:Not even close, unless you want to venture into subjective territory.
I mean, RAGE doesn't even have real-time dynamic lighting or physics or anything.
You may as well be comparing Myst to DOOM. Sure Myst presents a much prettier picture, but it's all pre-rendered.
bloodydrake said:but thats an absolutely horrible analogy.
I'd say its better then vanilla Crysis since I don't think its fair to compare Rage to major graphical mods version.
The Witcher 2 definitely has better Texture Detail and lighting effects tho its scope of its levels cant compare with Rages.
Artistic direction they're both fantastic.
You have a pretty nice line on PC of games ready to spank Rage in terms of technical graphics, dare i say overall look also. Witcher 2, Crysis, GTA:IV with Nhancer and the hard hitting but often overlooked Metro 2033. For all the texture variety talk you hear about Rage, the underground cities of Metro have a pretty good amount of texture samples and at a much higher quality.TheMan said:So forgive my ignorance (haven't really been into pc games for years now), but does this game stand a chance of dethroning crysis as the king of pc graphics?
This game has trouble dethroning Doom 3 as id's best looking game. The character models are very nice and some people may prefer its art over other games but objectively it cannot even be put in the running for best graphics.TheMan said:So forgive my ignorance (haven't really been into pc games for years now), but does this game stand a chance of dethroning crysis as the king of pc graphics?
Best effects in the business probably. I know Metro's character models are not of everyone's liking, however texture work for the uniforms and armors is astonishing, how they feature movile and dangling parts. How well curved parts are presented by the tesselation. And how the models convey a real sense of weight like NPCs are making a real effort to move, can't recall something that compares. Firts game of a small studio called A4 no less.Zefah said:The lighting and volumetric effects in Metro 2033 were simply incredible.
There has to be a crescendo or super boss missing, the elevator probably should have gone up another level to an arena of jetpack authority pig mutants, a bull mutant, and a stronger version of the tall authority guy. The whole capital prime design was boring hallways, maybe the whole mission was put together very quickly instead of just cutting levels.Zefah said:I refuse to believe that the game ended as the developers originally intended. I highly suspect they simply chopped off a few levels and are either going to sell them as DLC, or will use them to get a head start on the sequel.
LocoMrPollock said:Way to spoil it for people who haven't played yet, jackass. Nice touch with the CAPS. Maybe you are from 1996.
Refreshment.01 said:Best effects in the business probably. I know Metro's character models are not of everyone's liking, however texture work for the uniforms and armors is astonishing, how they feature movile and dangling parts. How well curved parts are conveyed by the tesselation. And how the models convey a real sense of wait like NPCs are making a real effort to move, can recall something that compares. Firts game of a small studio called A4 no less.
5 bucks on Steam today. Hurry up.
Ya Metro's another fantastic looking game without a doubt. Thoroughly enjoyed it visually and gameplayZefah said:The lighting and volumetric effects in Metro 2033 were simply incredible.
Xander51 said:What he wrote isn't related to the game at all.
it is the text from the end of the first episode of doom. It seemed fitting because as people have said Rage ends sort of abruptly.LocoMrPollock said:Oh. Carry on, then. Apologies.
LocoMrPollock said:Oh. Carry on, then. Apologies.
Brandon F said:So as an AMD 4890 owner I guess it's 360 recommended then?
You are set, only thing to watch out regarding performace is the advanced "dead" (depth) of field the most resource intensive effect. I don't know if at the the time you played the DLC was out, in any case go for ranger difficulty since it takes out the sight cursor and the enemies seem less stupid cause god only knows the radiation made those guys complete idiots.Zefah said:I should go replay that now that I have a better computer. Last time I went through it I was on a Core 2 Duo and a 4870. Now I'm on a i5 2500k and a 5870.
PC baby boy, things are improving for Rage and they only can get better and lessen load times. Also consider you might want to revisit the game when you have juicier hardware, so PC all the way is the right way.Brandon F said:So as an AMD 4890 owner I guess it's 360 recommended then?
Xander51 said:No worries, I just took it as a general irritation at the end of the game, which I fully agree with.
EDIT: Oh yeah, it totally is from Doom! Good one!
I'm playing through this again on Nightmare...it's actually the first time I've done that with an id game. Although the shooting is great, I really love the feel of the Wingsticks...best boomerang/glaive weapon in games. Dark Sector came close but this nails it.
You know another aspect of gameplay that becomes "cheap" or its abused by the player is the defib, it feels the player with such over confidence. I like the concept a lot but the mini game is way too easy, either it needs to be harder or put a chance element into it.Zefah said:The Wingblades are so awesome. Honestly, they feel almost like a cheat since they are so much better than most of the weapons and often result in one-hit kills.
Speaking of which. Anyone knows a link with test on how the load times are reduced in the PS3 version with an SSD? Comparisons with the 360 version would be interesting also.Gravijah said:the only major complaint i have with the ps3 version is that the loading times really suck and can be quite frequent. sometimes it makes me not even want to do another race.
C:\Users\yourname\Saved Games\id Software\Rage\base\savegameProdigal said:Anyone know where the Rage save files are located? I wanna back mine up before starting a new game (my friend wants to try it out) and it says "you will lose your current progress" if I click new game...
OverHeat said:What do the title of the game as to do with the actual story of the game?
QUAKE. DOOM. RAGE.OverHeat said:What do the title of the game as to do with the actual story of the game?
Multi GPU is still a no go, from what I recall. But you shouldn't be too worried. This game runs at 60fps very quickly. That is, after you've changed the settings in your GPU control panel accordingly to RAGE's likening.jambo said:Picked up a copy on my lunch break, can't wait to get it running tonight.
Does SLI work yet or still nothing?
Metal-Geo said:Multi GPU is still a no go