Furthermore... unlike those three games you just mentioned, RAGE is actually fun to play.
Fallout isn't fun to play? Fuck outta here.
Furthermore... unlike those three games you just mentioned, RAGE is actually fun to play.
I like the first two Fallout games. Anything else after that has only bored me to tears.Wallach said:Fallout isn't fun to play? Fuck outta here.
Stallion Free said:It did in the old days, but it will be interesting to see if they keep that here
I might actually try that just to play the defibrillator mini-game over and overSolo said:Nightmare is the only way to play.
I don't play cod. It's called the Wasteland and it's full of bandits and buggies. You would have to be ignorant to not see similarities.54-46! said:I get the feeling that same people who complain about this looking like Fallout or Borderlands are the same people who buy the new Call of Duty every single year.
Nah, Fallout was awesome and Borderlands was far from bad.? Narayan said:Furthermore... unlike those three games you just mentioned, RAGE is actually fun to play.
Effect said:For those that have played how well do characters react to your actions? If you completed a mission will random npcs still comment on it while you are still the area but several missions ahead? How populated are the settlements with NPCs?
Are you ever locked out of going back to areas once you are done?
How different are the various difficulties? Enemies just take more hits or does the number count increase? Does the game have waves of enemies that you have to force pass ala Call of Duty during missions or do they stop coming at a certain point allowing you to take your time in missions instead of rushing through them?
In general, without any details or spoilers, how is the story? Structured well? Not that important? Pulls you in?
Overall is the game worth the $60 price in terms of gameplay, story, content, graphics, length? To you of course as this is going to be different for each person.
how would I know which one I was?Suairyu said:This chinner = me meme has spread even to chinner himself. How long before he snaps and tries to kill me as a doppleganger?
I found both of them extremely boring. Whatever floats your boat.Mastperf said:Nah, Fallout was awesome and Borderlands was far from bad.
Why do you think I always stay so muddy in contrast to your pristine whiteness?Chinner said:how would I know which one I was?
http://www.geforce.com/Drivers/Results/38108Supports OpenGL 4.2 for GeForce 400 series and 500 series GPUs and OpenGL 3.3 for GeForce 8-series and later GPUs.
3chopl0x said:There are some nvidia beta drivers for BF3 out at the moment that have 4.2 support?
nel e nel said:The characters really shine on this game so far. I'm only 2 hours into it......
Wallach said:Speaking of RAGE, someone on SA mentioned idTech 5 was using OpenGL 4.2. Now the GPU specs make more sense.
Also there's no fucking official drivers for either camp with OpenGL 4.2 support. SWEET.
SteveWinwood said:Wait so how will it be 60 fps and look like that?
Man what a god.Wallach said:The dude at the top of the OP.
What if it'll be locked?zlatko said:I'll be playing through on nightmare difficulty the first time because I HAVE BALLS OF STEEL.
zlatko said:Is the review embargo up later tonight or tomorrow?
I'll be playing through on nightmare difficulty the first time because I HAVE BALLS OF STEEL.
Soviet said:What if it'll be locked?
zlatko said:PC version---I'll h4x0rz that shit open. xD
I'm getting sick of this developer monkey shit that doesn't think I'm ready for the big leagues until I play through your game once. I rarely replay any game, so if it is locked here in Rage, then hard mode it is and whatevs to nightmare.
I WANT to crank the difficulty to max on any game when I start it off. I know what I'm getting myself into when I pick the hardest difficulty. If it becomes that much of a problem (no game this generation has), then I'd turn it down a notch.
The only reason developers lock that hardest difficulty up is to give this pseudo bull shit "replay value," when their game just might not be interesting enough to warrant a second run through. Some games do(Witcher 2 for me), but I like the full experience right out the gate. Why hold that from the player ? After you complete the game once, then the hardest difficulty automatically isn't as hard as you thought it would be for the player since they'll know what is coming for the entirety of the game.
Wallach said:I dunno man, if they do it like Doom 3 I wouldn't play that way the first time. It wasn't just harder, it was a completely different game design.
zlatko said:I'd be all over it right out the gate. I'm one of the nutties who has actually been playing Witcher 2 on insane and am almost completely done with Act 1. That game erases your save if you die. I'm just seeing how far I can get and only put in time here and there into it, but I also refuse to game the system by making back up saves either.
Effect said:Thanks. Sounds like your standard reactions, when there are reactions, more recent games have given NPCs. Still like you said it's early and maybe there might be more later on. Story as well. I woudln't be surprised thinking about it if the story didn't start to get interesting until you came upon the Authority. How long it will take before that happens is what I wonder now. The lack of auto aim should make some of the harder difficulties challenging I think.
Tuesday morning 12:00am midnight EST, or 9:00pm Monday night PST.zlatko said:Is the review embargo up later tonight or tomorrow?
luxarific said:Just bought it. Hope it's more like FO3 than Borderlands.
It doesn't appear to play like either. Neither of the games you mentioned focused on refined gunplay. Borderlands was about loot and co-op, and had mediocre combat. Fallout 3 focused on being an RPG, and had terrible real-time gunplay. I'm admittedly only judging from videos, but Rage looks far better in that respect than those two.luxarific said:Just bought it. Hope it's more like FO3 than Borderlands.
Wallach said:You did that for your first playthrough? Or you're playing Insane now that you've beaten it before?
zlatko said:First play through. I then started another file to go through the game on hard as I was hooked on its story elements. The prologue isn't too bad on insane, but the actual Act 1 portions required me to do the tactic of running away for dear life if I was ever struck even once in combat, and at all times I had Quan/Quad(forgot the spelling) up. You have to do a lot of grinding on nekkars out in the forest and slowly work your way out into the forest bit by bit, and it's a good idea to get the side quests that don't require combat out of the way ASAP to help level a little quicker.
But yeah, that's a bit off topic. I enjoy being challenged on my first go at a game. I'm always pleased when games let me try the hardest difficulty right from the get go. It's a shame RAGE might not then.
Tain said:Is this game built around save-anywhere? Curious about the checkpoint structure.
Fallout, sure. Borderlands, though? So boring. The *only* reason I even played that game was because, for a while, the only gaming capable device I had was a netbook (and an iPhone but iOS gaming is a wasteland) and OnLive had just come out so I figured I would give it a try and used Borderlands as my initial OL purchase.Mastperf said:Nah, Fallout was awesome and Borderlands was far from bad.
IT'S NOT AN RPGluxarific said:Just bought it. Hope it's more like FO3 than Borderlands.
Wallach said:It is. The autosaves only trigger upon changing zones, I think. What constitutes zone separation exactly I don't really know.
thetrin said:IT'S NOT AN RPG
Do you guys not know how to read or something?