Raise the flame shield: Your "controversial" gaming opinion.

I think last of us is a awful video game with fantastic writing that's good enough to trick people. Seriously the combat in the game is awful, most of the dialogue involves me stopping the character or running far away from the person talking, and how many times did I have to jump in the water and raft Ellie!

It really bugged me how Joel apparently never had the idea of teaching Ellie how to swim. It seemed like he had time to.
 
I just finished "Brothers - A Tale of Two Sons" in one sitting and found it to be a very underwhelming experience. While it has a few neat ideas and settings, the whole comes off being way less than the sum of its parts.
 
I don't don't think I implied that academia was nothing more than just fancy sounding terminology, but it may have come off that way since as I was being purposefully dismissive. I guess I should further elaborate.

Academia, especially that of literature, does not have the luxury of strict, well defined logic and methodology of the sciences so as a result easy to make intelligent sounding interpretations but difficult to support or refute them because the only evidence is the academics own opinion. While opinions can be insightful it takes time for academics to come to a consensus of the overall merit of a work, especially when it cannot be easily defined within existing paradigms. This is why you often hear of works like The Great Gatsby that only become recognized after their creators have passed away.

However, literature academia is useful in spite of the the logistical shortcomings, because what these academics produce are not only intelligent-sounding, but also in distinguishing quality and by extension helping to construct a corpus of relevant knowledge. This takes time, care and an ivory tower. The videogame industry is profit-driven and when the middle-brow audience that funds it is pleased as long what read about makes them feel intelligent and good about their hobby, the studies that produce these gratifying interpretations be favored and commodified by middle-brow profiteers. In which case the point of academia is lost and it'll become just another outlet for marketing.

So, essentially, you believe that academic study of video games runs the risk of being too easy to co-opt as yet another marketing tool to live up to it's potential--if it hasn't already? It's an understandable assessment, given the self-congratulating undercurrent surrounding, say, The Last of Us, or Bioshock Infinite, or Gone Home. But I feel that's simply an inevitability of gaming's current place in the larger cultural landscape.

If the concept of video games as art was a person, it still wouldn't be old enough to walk yet IMO. Comics have been around in some form or another for hundreds of years, but AFAIK serious academic study that wasn't "OMG OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING CORRUPTED" didn't arise until about 30-35 years ago. I think it's WAY too early to worry.
 
"Waifus" and fanservice are shit.
Mass Effect 2 sucks
Mario 64 is not a good Mario game
Crash 2 is the best Naughty Dog game (TLoU is a close second)

I'm inclined to agree here. It was a revolutionary game for its time, and one of the most important (platform) games ever, but personally I don't find it neither particularly good nor particularly fun to play.

If you think TLoU is a walking simulator NEVER try DayZ. The true Walking Simulator 2K1

Silent Hill: Shattered Memories is the only walking simulator you will ever need.
 
I dunno if this qualifies as a controversial opinion but after finishing Max Payne 3 i found it to be a mediocre experience, did people here actually think it was good?
 
KotOR 2 is better as 3/4 of an RPG than KotOR 1's full game. And KotOR 1 is a great game, don't get me wrong, but the sequel is one of the most unique and compelling Star Wars stories ever.

SWTOR is an absolute pile of shit and a disgrace to the series. Bioware should be embarrassed for putting that out and daring to call it "KotOR 3-12", as if it was actually a true, honest continuation of the previous two games stories instead of a cash-grab MMO that pissed all over the characters and themes. The people who made TOR either had no clue how to make a worthy successor to the series, or had no interest. Personally I think it was the latter, and they just wanted to make their own Star Wars MMO and use the KotOR name as a brand to sell it.

Also, Bioware in general (including their crown jewel, the Mass Effect series) is way overhyped. They are not the best writers or RPG designers in the game industry by far. I wouldn't necessarily say that Mass Effect is a BAD series (although ME3 was pretty awful), but it's not worthy of the ridiculous praise and "best game series of all time!!" Everything that Mass Effect gets praised for (choice and consequences, characters, world), I could name at least five other games this generation that do them far better. They're fun for what they are, but they're not that good. To be honest, I think that the series' emphasis on cinematic presentation and streamlined accessibility has more to do with it's popularity than anything else.
 
I was pretty hyped for Wolfenstein: The New Order, especially after all the positivity here, but I found it really bland and boring. The stealth was good, the story was decent, the gunplay was good, but my God the shooting got really tiresome after a while. The horrendously bullet spongey heavies didn't help. Probably the most disappointing game this year for me.
 
I was pretty hyped for Wolfenstein: The New Order, especially after all the positivity here, but I found it really bland and boring. The stealth was good, the story was decent, the gunplay was good, but my God the shooting got really tiresome after a while. The horrendously bullet spongey heavies didn't help. Probably the most disappointing game this year for me.

I only finished it the other day and was pretty disappointed as well, I was really enjoying it to begin with but the waves of enemies towards the end really soured it for me. The fetch quest sections in the hideout were completely pointless and really ruined the momentum of the game, also wtf was with having to pick up every piece of ammo individually. What a stupid idea that was
 
my tinfoil hat theories for MS and EA:

1) Peter Moore left MS to go to EA for a future investment in order to corner specific markets with their buying power and resources.
1a) EA has notoriously and aggressively bought on game developers since, who then exhausted their resources and are eventually shutdown. EA Access is basically a graveyard of those studios hardwork.


2) Through out the 360 launch to current time, MS has put a significant amount of money in buying out timed exclusives in very clever ways like making Madden 30 fps ( via above), or using CoD4 as a timed exclusive. This gave it significant momentum, and they advertised it heavily.

3) I also believe that there has been a significant astroturfing campaign going on in the forums, and upon each mess up there seems to be a direct parallel between the shift and then what certain posters and writers focus on.

4) I also believe that all of the mess ups in terms of resolution gate and other misinformation were not mistakes, i.e. Digital Foundary, Polygon, etc. It was a coordinated action to perceive parity, working in part with the astroturfing campaign. Perhaps the writers were unaware or were withheld information, however for a reason.

5) Sony is held to a much high standard, not only with the press but in the forums for their games and efforts. No games, arrogant, etc. Even reviews.

6) Fanboys are also a huge issue, for both sides, but I genuinely think there is a much higher coordinated effort from MS to infiltrate forums and websites to spread misinformation. Concern trolling, with Naught Dog and The Order in particular.
 
I only finished it the other day and was pretty disappointed as well, I was really enjoying it to begin with but the waves of enemies towards the end really soured it for me. The fetch quest sections in the hideout were completely pointless and really ruined the momentum of the game, also wtf was with having to pick up every piece of ammo individually. What a stupid idea that was
Picking up anything in that game feels anal as shit. Still fun tho
 
I think dlc has pretty much ruined gaming.

We are never, ever going to get games as a complete product - like they should be - ever again. And gamers have no one but themselves to blame.

I also think gamers are flat out idiots when it comes to things like standing up for their consumer rights. They'll happily give them up for the newest, shiniest thing that comes along, including Steam.

Steam trained a generation of gamers it's okay to give up your consumer rights for a few bucks during a sale.

Lastly, shut up about frame rate.
I understand the concept that a better fr makes a game smoother, but it dominates every conversation about every upcoming game to such a degree that it just comes across as whining.

Either play the game or don't. Whining about the fr just makes me want to tune you out completely.
 
The Jak and Daxter series is better than the Ratchet and Sly games

NBA and NFL Street games are infinitely more fun than the Madden and 2K

Call of Duty became boring after WaW and MW2

I enjoyed SWTOR's story mode

Fallout 3 is this better than Skyrim and New Vegas

Halo 3 and Halo Reach was the best multiplayer in the series
 
I did not like the last of us too much.
God of war 3 was only fun for the first battle.
Dont like lego games due to their graphic style.
 
I said it before in this thread and I'll say it again. Metroid other M was/is more of a Metroid game than Metroid Prime.
 
Destiny has everything an MMO needs to be called an MMO from a content standpoint.

It's HaloLand Online. It's basically Borderlands in a Halo setting with raids. I've been describing it that way to people since the initial announcement.

SWTOR is an absolute pile of shit and a disgrace to the series. Bioware should be embarrassed for putting that out and daring to call it "KotOR 3-12", as if it was actually a true, honest continuation of the previous two games stories instead of a cash-grab MMO that pissed all over the characters and themes.

I'll disagree. The actual questing and story elements of SWTOR were hands down the best part, and I had a ton of fun leveling different classes for that reason. The game was only actually a piece of shit when you hit max level, and that has since been remedied I hear. Dungeons were nearly unplayable and the faction imbalance was so bad you spent 90% of the PvP time playing Huttball against the same people on your faction over and over.

The only reason that "Kotor 3-12" came up is because people demanded to know where SWTOR fit in chronologically, so they said it took place after Kotor 2 but had tons more content, enough content to dub it "Kotor 3-12". Calling it a cash grab is silly because it was actually a phenomenal value in terms of story-driven content. It would take you several months to level each class and they all had very different stories.
 
I also think gamers are flat out idiots when it comes to things like standing up for their consumer rights. They'll happily give them up for the newest, shiniest thing that comes along, including Steam.

Steam trained a generation of gamers it's okay to give up your consumer rights for a few bucks during a sale.

TdNYRT6.gif
 
I'm pro #gamergate and #notyourshield

I don't agree with the internet threats obviously. But I don't think those ppl represent the majority of gamergate supporters.

Also I 100% disagree with the notion that gamergate is an attack on women, at its core.
That claim has no solid footing imo
 
Persona 3 > 4 due to its OST and atmosphere overall

Red Dead is a great game, but it is boring

The Nintendo 64 wasn't that good and the controller is awful

DLC is amazing when done correctly

Mario Kart 7 is one of the 3 worst Mario Kart games and is still amazing

Super Mario 3D Land is underrated and one of 3DS' best games

Left 4 Dead is not very good

Pokemon R/S/E is the worst region

Halo: Reach is the best Halo game

Halo 3 ODST isn't very good, it's just good

Console gaming will not be dying anytime soon and in fact will strengthen this gen
 
The entire Halo series is utter shit. The only people infatuated with the game are those who were first exposed to online shooters forming a REALLY LTTP attachment to a mediocre series. Controversial but true.
 
Dota 2 is a 10 year old, outdated piece of crap (in terms of gameplay) that was reskinned. There's no reason for there to be such a huge built in delay and for it to have it's terribly sluggish engine/gameplay. Emulating WC3's limitations instead of rebalancing the game to work with a modern response time/turn rate was a bad choice.

HoN, LoL and every other moba I've played feel much better from a game play stand point.
During it's golden year or two before they starting adding awful original champions, HoN was the true Dota 2 to me.

You don't really get Dota do you? It really is better to call it an ARTS and not lump it in with the "MOBA's"
 
Might as well pop in. I bought the Last of Us on PS3 used and returned it a few days later because it felt like a chore. However, I kept my mouth shut since I hadn't finished it and it supposedly got better right after where I stopped.

Sat with my friend as he played through the rest of the game on PS4 last week. For what was supposed to be the Children of Men of videogames, it felt awfully like the World War Z.
 
I didn't like Infamous Second Son at all, while I loved Knack especially in Co-Op. I still think Knack is the best exclusive game on the PS4. I feel that Second Son was just lacking alot of what made the previous games fun, especially Infamous 2. Hopefully now that they got the engine running we'll be able to get a better Infamous game since the'll have more to time to work on it and actually create some content for the open world they made. Second Son was literally story missions in an open world. Knack just was so much fun playing Co-OP with a friend and for me I just found it much more fun experience than Infamous, and it's why I hope that someday we'll get a Knack 2 with some actual variety and more depth to the combat. Knack has the potential to become very good with more time put into it.
 
Speaking of knack, all the ppl who talk shit about knack but then beg for it month after month on ps+ are complete assholes. This isnt even me trying to ignite the knack defense force. You just dont walk into a butcher shop and talk shit about the meat but then clamor for the scraps thrown away at the end of the night

Speaking of ps+, it brings about the most inflated sense of entitlement that I've seen. "Wtf ps+ is offering me all these games that i already own/bought/played from when they originally released?! This is another shitty month for ps+. This service sucks"

Similarly i think the notion of "I'm mildly interested in this game but i think I'll wait til i get it free on ps+" is damaging to the industry as a whole
 
A couple:
-I hate achievements, in fact I think they have ruined games to a degree. Achievements are thrown in at pointless story intervals for no other reason then to have a visible way to track progress and to give false replay value. If I do something amazing in a game, then I know and not because a popup said so.

-I hate Microsoft. Once upon a time they supported PC gaming. Then they decided to make money from the console market and released the Xbox. This is a great business decision and I had no problem with this. What I had a problem with was gutting all their PC studios and then actively trying to kill PC gaming with the most intrusive DRM method I've ever seen outside of Starforce.
 
A couple:
-I hate achievements, in fact I think they have ruined games to a degree. Achievements are thrown in at pointless story intervals for no other reason then to have a visible way to track progress and to give false replay value. If I do something amazing in a game, then I know and not because a popup said so.

-I hate Microsoft. Once upon a time they supported PC gaming. Then they decided to make money from the console market and released the Xbox. This is a great business decision and I had no problem with this. What I had a problem with was gutting all their PC studios and then actively trying to kill PC gaming with the most intrusive DRM method I've ever seen outside of Starforce.

I'm not so sure either of those are "controversial" opinions. At least on GAF...

OT: I think the Xbox One has been the better current gen console for 2014 given the exclusives.
 
A couple:
-I hate achievements, in fact I think they have ruined games to a degree. Achievements are thrown in at pointless story intervals for no other reason then to have a visible way to track progress and to give false replay value. If I do something amazing in a game, then I know and not because a popup said so.

I actually like the concept of achievements.
When implemented properly, in a creative way (tip: "completed the tutorial" is anything but creative) they can be an incentive to try some cool or fun things - I had lots of fun with some of the achievements in Vanquish, for instance, as they encouraged me to play more aggressively and step out of my comfort zone with my playstyle.
And I sorta like the idea of my progress with a game being visible to others, though arbitrary story-related achievements are probably a crappy way of showing that. It's just this little social thing, that I can see that a friend of mine is this far into a game I already played, so I know I can mention some parts of the game to them without spoiling stuff. Kinda neat.

Though all the grindy, random, pointless, or multiplayer-oriented achievements can go die in a fire.
 
I actually like the concept of achievements.
When implemented properly, in a creative way (tip: "completed the tutorial" is anything but creative) they can be an incentive to try some cool or fun things - I had lots of fun with some of the achievements in Vanquish, for instance, as they encouraged me to play more aggressively and step out of my comfort zone with my playstyle.
And I sorta like the idea of my progress with a game being visible to others, though arbitrary story-related achievements are probably a crappy way of showing that. It's just this little social thing, that I can see that a friend of mine is this far into a game I already played, so I know I can mention some parts of the game to them without spoiling stuff. Kinda neat.

Though all the grindy, random, pointless, or multiplayer-oriented achievements can go die in a fire.


yes the lastest woflenstein did a great job of making me play with different stlyes of gameplay. but I still hate platinum trophies.....probably because I dont have any... just like 4000 other ones.
 
Maybe there's something lost in translation, but I don't understand how anyone can play a JRPG without cringing to death. The dialogue is almost fascinatingly awful.
 
All first person shooters look the same to me.

you should see a doctor... just in case you have a lobotomy or something you know, just in case. :)


case in point:
Wolfenstien-Boarderlands
Boishock-Battlefield
Killzone-Halo
COD-Dishonered
HL2-Destiny

Ok I'm done.
 
Maybe there's something lost in translation, but I don't understand how anyone can play a JRPG without cringing to death. The dialogue is almost fascinatingly awful.
The only 'j-style' RPG that didn't have overly melodramatic and/or simplistic (my disdain for the stereotypical "hot-blooded hero" is astronomical) dialogue was Anachronox.

Moving onwards, I like the UFO: After-something series by Altar and believe they were unfairly dismissed.
 
Xenogears > FFVI > FFVII > Chrono Trigger (yup...I went there)

Suikoden I > Suikoden II > Suikoden V > Suikoden IV > Suikoden III (Suikoden III SUCKS!!!)

Star Ocean 3 is TERRBILE (not sure if that's controversial though lol).

Rouge Galaxy....TERRIBLE!!!

Ok, enough with RPGs.
 
Maybe there's something lost in translation, but I don't understand how anyone can play a JRPG without cringing to death. The dialogue is almost fascinatingly awful.

I play JRPGs almost exclusively. I also let the voice actors finish talking before moving to the next line or read all the text if it isn't voiced. You develop coping mechanisms.

I'm usually browsing the internet during cutscenes or extended dialogue and trusting I'll notice if they say anything interesting or important (almost never). If it goes on too long, or happens too frequently, I'll sometimes talk over them MST3K-style. When that gets old, I will complain out loud about how stupid the dialogue is.

Bravely Default, I honestly had to put down in disgust quite a few times.

Should probably just start skipping dialogue.
 
Xenoblade Chronicles is overrated and if people consider it the jrpg of the generation - then that means the jRPGs of this past gen were poor in quality overall compared to previous gens (especially the last 2 gens before it).
 
Xbox One is better than PS4

edit: Dreamcast and 360 are the best consoles ever made

edit 2: Persona is a dating sim and is boring
 
-Playstation All Stars Battle Royale is a great game.
-Zelda games are boring.
-Half-Life 2 has not aged well.
-Final Fantasy XII is a good game.
-Xbox one is a good console.
-I love the Playstation Vita and find many people are ignorant about it and the amount of games it really has.
-I feel the same way about the Wii U, it is just as good as the Wii and Gamecube.
-Even though most of the games are similar the Call of Duty games are still good.
-Gamecube controller sucks.
-Dualshock controller is best controller.
 
I don't know if this controversial at all, but I'll say Zelda Twilight Princess is overrated.

We don't know yet. Zelda fandom operates on the same principle as Schrodinger's Cat. Every opinion is simultaneously controversial and accepted wisdom until the next console Zelda is released.
 
The Last of us is one of the worst games ever, I wouldn't even call it a game, along with almost anything that has "Naughty dog" on it.

Folklore is easily the best PS3 exclusive, one of my favorite games last gen.
 
Top Bottom