Half in the Bag and new commentary coming soon... and it sounds like they may be related.
Fingers crossed on Jurassic Park 2 or 3 commentary!
Are we sure they're not doing HitB for Spy and a commentary track for Tammy?
I liked Jurassic Park 3.
There I said it.
I liked Jurassic Park 3.
There I said it.
Gross.
I really hope they enjoyed how silly it was.Alright, seen Jurassic World, ready for the HitB.
It was ok.
I really hope they enjoyed how silly it was.
I think Jay will mention how fun the movie was, but Mike is probably going to tear it apart.
I think the exact opposite. Jay may enjoy it, but I think he is going to be pretty critical of it. Mike is just going to say it doesn't try to be anything other than what it knows it is, and for what it is, it is good. I think they will both agree is isn't as good as Park, but it is the best Jurassic sequel.
I hope they bring Rich and Jack into the discussion. If they do, then I expect Rich to hate it and Jack to enjoy it.
Its way better than 2 and World.I was nice knowing you. Soon they will come and take you to the place you belong.
Farewell friend.
I honestly have a hard time believing that it's possible to like that movie.
I tried to watch the trilogy last year or something. I made it through the second one despite not liking it. The third one, I got maybe 30 minutes in. Everything about it was so bad.
Man I liked it. Its dumb in ways I can enjoy where I'm not questioning characters motives. Like bringing a T-Rex to LA is dumb as fuck considering what happened on the island.
Invading Iraq is dumb as fuck considering what happened in Afghanistan... Vietnam... Korea...
I think the exact opposite. Jay may enjoy it, but I think he is going to be pretty critical of it. Mike is just going to say it doesn't try to be anything other than what it knows it is, and for what it is, it is good. I think they will both agree is isn't as good as Park, but it is the best Jurassic sequel.
I hope they bring Rich and Jack into the discussion. If they do, then I expect Rich to hate it and Jack to enjoy it.
They mentioned margaritas dude.
All is well with the world.
Surprised they didn't mention who that was.
Really? There are people calling JW a sexist movie?
...really?
Main argument I could see is that the strong independent woman who don't need no familyat the end. But I don't really care.ends up wanting to have babies with pratt
Yeah, I was pretty surprised about how each enjoyed it. Maybe not so much Jay, but Mike, definitely.Mike and Jay's reactions are each the opposite of what I would have expected.
Main argument I could see is that the strong independent woman who don't need no familyat the end. But I don't really care.ends up wanting to have babies with pratt
That's not sexist tho.
That's movie romance.
romance is pretty sexist
I was going to post that.Wow, even in the commentary track Mike manages to shit on Rich. lol
I think the exact opposite. Jay may enjoy it, but I think he is going to be pretty critical of it. Mike is just going to say it doesn't try to be anything other than what it knows it is, and for what it is, it is good.
Disappointed they don't mention just how convenient the knowledge of the kids is
Lol that and the car scene. Convenient knowledge and skillskids know everything about dinosaurs
I love the fact that now mike and jay have to work for rich and jack. given how IRL mike gives not a single fuck about games, and jay mildly tolerates them.Best joke in newest HitB was Jack and Rich pretending to go to E3. That's like Mike going to the Boyhood Expo.
I love the fact that now mike and jay have to work for rich and jack. given how IRL mike gives not a single fuck about games, and jay mildly tolerates them.
It make it all the more funnier.
At this point it's conformation bias.Really? There are people calling JW a sexist movie?
...really?
At this point it's conformation bias.
I'd like to confirm your opinion but I'll wait till the full length feature film comes out.Oh please, anyone who wants to see confirmation bias is going to find it everywhere.
(jk if not obvious)
Sadly, I have. Went with my friends from Chicago when they were in town. They liked Shasta McNasty so they wanted to see Jake Busey. I have never seen such a terrible film. Like, there were only two other people in the audience and not a single laugh throughout the entire film. It was quite the experience.So, I haven't seen the JW HitB episode yet, but I did see the movie opening morning and found it very underwhelming and lazy/cynical for a lot of it (so feel free to ignore my thoughts). With that said, I think what people don't understand is that it is possible to like a movie that is "problematic". You can like Gone With the Wind without being a racist or you can like Kick-Ass without being a homophobe. Jurassic World has major problems (my thoughts are about second or third page in the spoiler OT for what I found wrong with the movie), but I think you have to be willfully ignorant to not see ANY sexist elements in the way Howard's character is presented. No, it's not the most sexist or misogynist Hollywood movie ever made (anyone seen the comedy Tomcats?), but it has issues. And it doesn't make you a terrible person for liking the movie despite it. And, movies aren't 100% misogynist or not (just like they aren't 100% feminist or not). And, just because lots of other movies do certain things does not excuse this movie.
Maybe it is an insularity/bubble thing where you don't understand or see the outdated archetype of her character or the running in heals or various story beats or whatever, but they are there, many neutral critics have observed them and pointed them out. And, again, it doesn't mean you are a terrible person for liking the film.