By an unverified intelligence source, which means it has been published as fact without proof, for all we know a 15 year old could have whipped this up in their moms basement over a weekend.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-contactsAn official in the US administration who spoke to the Guardian described the source who wrote the intelligence report as consistently reliable, meticulous and well-informed, with a reputation for having extensive Russian contacts.
So Carl Bernstein lied on national television. That's your stance.
If they were briefed in the same room, at the same time, was Obama all
Of course they should be briefed. This is a damaging piece about to go out int he wild. Not briefing them/preparing them would be sheer stupidity. That doesn't mean they believe everything in it though.
By an unverified intelligence source, which means it has been published as fact without proof, for all we know a 15 year old could have whipped this up in their moms basement over a weekend.
I wonder if Obama got briefed by 4 intelligence chiefs about his Keynesian birth certificate.
I wonder if Obama got briefed by 4 intelligence chiefs about his Keynesian birth certificate.
Are you putting this 35 pages report on the same level as the birther movement? Really?
Also I'm prety sure he was briefed on it and on how to react to it (since he eventually adressed it)
This is no different than any report written by a former CIA member. Why would this one (which provides no evidences, just hearsay) be better?
Im merely saying that the "Former MI6 member" shouldn't be a free pass card knowing who commandited the report in the first place (#NeverTrump people within the GOP right?)
So what? That's at worst childish. That's like, the least of your worries if 10% of the report is true
I mean for that to be true, you'd have to assume that the intelligence community is totally incompetent and presented something with zero sourcing to the president and president-elect.
Obama didn't get briefed on Pizzagate.
Honestly will this information change anything? Trump supporters won't turn on him for this and will circumnavigate the globe via backpedalling if they have to.
This an actually funny typo.
A grown up man let hookers pee on the mattress where the President slept, because he is full of hate for the President.
And your reaction is so what.
Okay.
Anyone interested in reading all 35 pages.
Here is the full report as a .pdf
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984/Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.pdf
If this election or anything in recent times have taught me anything it's that just because the "Top Brass" have been alerted to something does not make it true.
You would think with the amount of fake news going around that people would use more common sense than to rely on something that is unverified and just for clarification, a document leaking out on the internet isn't verification that a former MI6 agent wrote it.
Weren't people on hete just the other day shitting all over wikileaks for leaking fake information? Why is the same level of suspicion not being used now?
If this election or anything in recent times have taught me anything it's that just because the "Top Brass" have been alerted to something does not make it true.
You would think with the amount of fake news going around that people would use more common sense than to rely on something that is unverified and just for clarification, a document leaking out on the internet isn't verification that a former MI6 agent wrote it.
Weren't people on hete just the other day shitting all over wikileaks for leaking fake information? Why is the same level of suspicion not being used now?
Why are you equating senior intelligence officials with wikileaks?If this election or anything in recent times have taught me anything it's that just because the "Top Brass" have been alerted to something does not make it true.
You would think with the amount of fake news going around that people would use more common sense than to rely on something that is unverified and just for clarification, a document leaking out on the internet isn't verification that a former MI6 agent wrote it.
Weren't people on hete just the other day shitting all over wikileaks for leaking fake information? Why is the same level of suspicion not being used now?
If this election or anything in recent times have taught me anything it's that just because the "Top Brass" have been alerted to something does not make it true.
You would think with the amount of fake news going around that people would use more common sense than to rely on something that is unverified and just for clarification, a document leaking out on the internet isn't verification that a former MI6 agent wrote it.
Weren't people on hete just the other day shitting all over wikileaks for leaking fake information? Why is the same level of suspicion not being used now?
Yes because that's the least of one's worries about the contents of that report
Like, at the bottom of the bottom of the pile.
Waiting for the tape to leak.
Exactly.
Well in this time and day, it's always better to take sensational news with caution and not be too eager to believe them because they fit our agenda. But even if it is fake, it may have the benefit of making everybody consider the issue of fake news, even those who were usually the first to believe them, and maybe (maybe) help people be more critical in the future. And if it is true, then something really needs to come out of it, in my opinion (but then it's for Americans to take their responsibilities).
Funny thing is how much of the focus is on the sex/pee stuff, when the major issue should be about all the intelligence stuff, money changing hands and conflicts of interest.
I agree that Trump being a traitor is the bigger news.
I disagree that the future President living out crazy hate in crazy ways is a "So what?" story. It is normal. It is deeply disturbing.
By an unverified intelligence source, which means it has been published as fact without proof, for all we know a 15 year old could have whipped this up in their moms basement over a weekend.
This all sounds so ridiculous, like Trump hate-fiction. I'm still skeptical, as much as I'd like it to be true. If ANY of it is, Trump is literally scum of the earth and deserves to go under the jail, but I'm not about to whip myself into a self-righteous frenzy just yet. Problem is how the fuck DO you verify any of this?
Anyone interested in reading all 35 pages.
Here is the full report as a .pdf
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984/Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.pdf
This all sounds so ridiculous, like Trump hate-fiction. I'm still skeptical, as much as I'd like it to be true. If ANY of it is, Trump is literally scum of the earth and deserves to go under the jail, but I'm not about to whip myself into a self-righteous frenzy just yet. Problem is how the fuck DO you verify any of this?
Political coordination takes it from conflicts of interests to sedition.
The source being vetted by American intelligence as reliable and consistent and the prescience of some of its parts makes it at least worthy of investigation. If this turns out to be a dud... heads will roll. And the mainstream media will never be the same again.
Either way, we are entering uncharted waters. The effects of post-truth reporting are already palpable.
He cant.I still think Trump might cancel the press conference.
Let shit go nuclear.
Exactly.
Great summaryAlso want to stress again:
This is NOT the intelligence briefing report compiled by NSA/CIA/FBI.
This has been compiled by an Ex MI6 agent's agency who spent most of the 90s in Moscow and since then has good connections to Intelligence sources there.
Apparently this 35 page report was initially ordered by Trump's GOP rivals so they could get some dirt on him.
This report was referenced by the CIA/FBI/NSA briefing though and all three agencies believe its source to be credible (at least in the past), even though most of the allegations at this point in time probably cannot be proven with enough direct evidence.
Apparently the NSA/CIA/FBI briefing also referenced other sources, not just this report.
The report apparently was known to Harry Reid back in October when he tried to have FBi director Comey action on it and then later McCain handed it over to Comey as well.
So this is just the beginning.
Russia have zero incentive to do this.
I still think Trump might cancel the press conference.
Let shit go nuclear.
I wonder if Obama got briefed by 4 intelligence chiefs about his Keynesian birth certificate.
What are the odds that the ex-MI6 person got fed bogus data to discredit links between Russia and the Trump campaign? Knowing the FSB, that wouldn'T be super far fetched