Bam Bam Baklava
Member
And the mainstream media will never be the same again.
Buzzfeed would never be the same again. The media report things that are wrong all the time and people always move on.
And the mainstream media will never be the same again.
You'd be surprised at how prevalent defacing your opponents is.
It's usually not made public (but you learn of it when those people pass away)... While gross, it really doesn't bother me all that much, it's childish, stupid (but hey, it's Trump, so who's really surprised here?) and pointless.
He cant.
That would be unprecedented and unpresidented
How is you not being surprised, congrats on totally seeing this story coming, relevant to you?
The amount and scope of the data makes it super far fetched, unless he is a double agent.
In which case, Hail Hydra.
Read the report and find out why it's relevant to the discussion of his relationship with Russia.Personally I don't believe it has to have any credit to get to this stage but that's just my lack of faith in intelligence agencies in general rather than proof this is not credible.
I just think it's better to wait and take things with a "pinch of salt" until we have full verified proof instead of just believing things because it involves Trump.
I also don't understand why Trump watching a piss show would be relevant in an intelligence report.
Personally I don't believe it has to have any credit to get to this stage but that's just my lack of faith in intelligence agencies in general rather than proof this is not credible.
I just think it's better to wait and take things with a "pinch of salt" until we have full verified proof instead of just believing things because it involves Trump.
I also don't understand why Trump watching a piss show would be relevant in an intelligence report.
It's not PEOTUS Trump, it's PEEONUS Trump.
Personally I don't believe it has to have any credit to get to this stage but that's just my lack of faith in intelligence agencies in general rather than proof this is not credible.
I just think it's better to wait and take things with a "pinch of salt" until we have full verified proof instead of just believing things because it involves Trump.
I also don't understand why Trump watching a piss show would be relevant in an intelligence report.
I also don't understand why Trump watching a piss show would be relevant in an intelligence report.
Yes because that's the least of one's worries about the contents of that report
Like, at the bottom of the bottom of the pile.
The irony in these kind of responses.
I have read the report, back to front, twice, it seems petulant which is one of the reasons I am questioning the validity of it.
Peskov as architect (according to PDF) of the bull in a china shop hacking and Election fiddling operation is now someone who has to get the kremlin safely out of the shit, or Putin will be announcing his rather sudden departure."We are growing rather tired of these accusations. It is becoming a full-on witch hunt," Peskov said, echoing Trump's claim ahead of Friday's briefing by spy chiefs that the hacking revelations were a "political witch hunt" aimed at discrediting him.
Some prominent journalists and media executives excoriated BuzzFeed.
Even Donald Trump deserves journalistic fairness, tweeted David Corn, Mother Jones Washington bureau chief who reported in October on the existence of but not the contents of memos from a former Western intelligence officer.
Rare that a story stinks from every possible angle: the source, the content, the consequence, the messenger, the target, tweeted Wolfgang Blau, chief digital officer of Conde Nast International and a former Guardian executive.
Not how journalism works: Heres a thing that might or might not be true, without supporting evidence; decide for yourself if its legit, tweeted Brad Heath, an investigative reporter for USA Today.
Adam Goldman of the New York Times blamed CNN for opening the can of worms. Sequence of events: @CNN finds way to talk about report and @buzzfeed uses that as reason to publish. Media critics are gonna be busy, he tweeted.
I have read the report, back to front, twice, it seems petulant which is one of the reasons I am questioning the validity of it.
Also, I don't really understand how one 'briefs' the person who is the very subject of these findings. What is the person supposed to say?
As far as I'm concerned, this would be the worst case scenario. Trump would get free reign and MSM would be discredited for decades to come, being replaced by BreitBart and similar identity-driven outlets.Does no one remember the 2004 election with George Bush's draft dodging? CBS published documents claiming to prove it and when they were shown to be fake the entire subject was dropped.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg...ontroversy#Memos_allegedly_from_Jerry_Killian
Publicising such a dodgy document far and wide means that if (when?) they're shown to be fake it'll be used as an excuse to discount ALL Trump-Russia stories.
Additonally:
I also don't understand why Trump watching a piss show would be relevant in an intelligence report.
The report claims the Russians have footage of that and could use it to blackmail Trump. So it's relevant, if true.
Not how journalism works: Heres a thing that might or might not be true, without supporting evidence; decide for yourself if its legit, tweeted Brad Heath, an investigative reporter for USA Today.:
Personally I don't believe it has to have any credit to get to this stage but that's just my lack of faith in intelligence agencies in general rather than proof this is not credible.
I just think it's better to wait and take things with a "pinch of salt" until we have full verified proof instead of just believing things because it involves Trump.
I also don't understand why Trump watching a piss show would be relevant in an intelligence report.
I wonder if Obama got briefed by 4 intelligence chiefs about his Keynesian birth certificate.
"We know they have shit on you. This is the shit they have on you. We'll be watching".
Being that some of the allegations are also difficult to corroborate, it also allows to check Trump's reaction and act in consequence.
As far as I'm concerned, this would be the worst case scenario. Trump would get free reign and MSM would be discredited for decades to come, being replaced by BreitBart and similar identity-driven outlets.
That's my issue with this entire thing, the lack of evidence.
"We know they have shit on you. This is the shit they have on you. We'll be watching".
Being that some of the allegations are also difficult to corroborate, it also allows to check Trump's reaction and act in consequence.
As far as I'm concerned, this would be the worst case scenario. Trump would get free reign and MSM would be discredited for decades to come, being replaced by BreitBart and similar identity-driven outlets.
1.The intelligence source is CLAIMED to be former British intelligence, no proof.
2.The intention is to present it as fact or it would not be published in the first place. The intention is to undermine the president elect and by publishing this information without evidence is is liable to be harmful, even more so if it is disproven because like another poster said it will then make all information regarding Trump and Russian seem false going forward.
If this is fake news then it is going to be very dangerous and should teach us all a lesson going forward, if it's accurate well then it's pretty clear Trump needs to be removed.
1.The intelligence source is CLAIMED to be former British intelligence, no proof.
2.The intention is to present it as fact or it would not be published in the first place. The intention is to undermine the president elect and by publishing this information without evidence is is liable to be harmful, even more so if it is disproven because like another poster said it will then make all information regarding Trump and Russian seem false going forward.
If this is fake news then it is going to be very dangerous and should teach us all a lesson going forward, if it's accurate well then it's pretty clear Trump needs to be removed.
Here comes the Russian cleanup crew. Nothing to see here comrade, move along.
So everything is 100% accurate.https://apnews.com/57653c95a72d4e258...&utm_medium=AP
Moscow has officially called it a complete fabrication and utter nonsense
https://apnews.com/57653c95a72d4e2587eda5a82138468e/Moscow-denies-having-compromising-information-about-Trump?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP
Moscow has officially called it a complete fabrication and utter nonsense
https://apnews.com/57653c95a72d4e2587eda5a82138468e/Moscow-denies-having-compromising-information-about-Trump?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP
Moscow has officially called it a complete fabrication and utter nonsense
If a fraction of this report is true, what the hell is going to happen? The next couple weeks will be interesting.
Urine the ballparkSo everything is 100% accurate.
Urine the ballpark
blame trump
By using Twitter by lying and by rushing to say things to gain the advantage, he sets the standard.
He is being hoisted by his own petard
If it wasn't him, nobody would publish it in isolation. He himself demonstrates how he should be treated.
Fucking knew it. I knew the Russian's had dirty on this guy. You dirty little beast, look what you've done.
Not that it will make much of as difference. I'm sure he'll weather the storm, but he's dirty as hell. I doubt he'll see this term out I'd guess he'll be impeached. the russians will probably dump the whole thing when its suits them to throw the US into chaos. Probably around the midterms maybe.
1.The intelligence source is CLAIMED to be former British intelligence, no proof.
2.The intention is to present it as fact or it would not be published in the first place. The intention is to undermine the president elect and by publishing this information without evidence is is liable to be harmful, even more so if it is disproven because like another poster said it will then make all information regarding Trump and Russian seem false going forward.
If this is fake news then it is going to be very dangerous and should teach us all a lesson going forward, if it's accurate well then it's pretty clear Trump needs to be removed.