They were roundly criticized for making this claim.Crazy that Mother Jones reported on it on Oct and no one picked it up.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...ging-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump
IF this is all true, Watergate looks like kid's stuff in comparison. I mean it's that bad.
So how sure are we about the validity of these documents?
I guess I am a little lost how these docs have been around since late October, but it was never brought up.
I've got some crow to eat for thinking that painting Stein as a Russian lackey was a bit far-fetched. My bad on that one.
Remember when Jill Stein asked for money for recounts and people obliged? Y'all got swindled.
IF this is all true, Watergate looks like kid's stuff in comparison. I mean it's that bad.
That's way too accurate. This must have been pretty well known among journalists but they never published it because it seemed too ridiculous.
"The Guardian can confirm that the documents reached the top of the FBI by December. Senator John McCain, who was informed about the existence of the documents separately by an intermediary from a western allied state, dispatched an emissary overseas to meet the source and then decided to present the material to Comey in a one-on-one meeting on 9 December, according to a source aware of the meeting."
Wow.
So is this ALL just rumors for now, or is there some portion that has been substantiated?
"The Guardian can confirm that the documents reached the top of the FBI by December. Senator John McCain, who was informed about the existence of the documents separately by an intermediary from a western allied state, dispatched an emissary overseas to meet the source and then decided to present the material to Comey in a one-on-one meeting on 9 December, according to a source aware of the meeting."
Wow.
With a republican controlled congress? Yes.I haven't read all of this,
but say everything is true;
He will still be President correct, and nothing will change?
From everything we've heard the documents appear to be valid. The information within the documents is currently unsubstantiated, but was included in the briefing to Obama and Trump, which means at the very least the intelligence community believes that the source of the information is credible, even if the information contained within is unverified.
Is Trump's press conference tomorrow only on TV or is it live streaming HIYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Isn't pence inherently implicated in all this if campaign staff was collaborating with the Russians while he was on the ticket?
It would make zero sense to just hand it over to pence.
Problem here is that the GOP won't want to do anything about this as it hurts their party in general to admit that their president elect was essentially a Russian agent.
... wat
Okay so I have read the whole buzzfeed report, I am Australian that despsises Trump, but I am not up on American laws regarding this type of stuff, what can the outcome be of this? will he be impeached? who is the best person/reporter/journalist to follow on twitter to stay informed on all this or what website is the best to see the fallout?
Crazy that Mother Jones reported on it on Oct and no one picked it up.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...ging-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump
Patton Oswalt ‏@pattonoswalt 2m2 minutes ago
IF this is all true, Watergate looks like kid's stuff in comparison. I mean it's that bad.
In other news the normalization of watersports is now here, ushered in by our President Elect. What a time to be hydrated.
"The Guardian can confirm that the documents reached the top of the FBI by December. Senator John McCain, who was informed about the existence of the documents separately by an intermediary from a western allied state, dispatched an emissary overseas to meet the source and then decided to present the material to Comey in a one-on-one meeting on 9 December, according to a source aware of the meeting."
Wow.
Can some summarize this because I don't have time to read all the reports right now