NYR
Member
I apologize. I won't comment on it anymore.Please stop the Laura Ingraham derail.
Apologies to all for derailing.
I apologize. I won't comment on it anymore.Please stop the Laura Ingraham derail.
"Notice how Cohen's passport cover is black?
That's a diplomatic passport, not a normal one
So even if he did show the inside (and assuming he didn't travel inter-EU as mentioned previously), it wouldn't mean anything, because the stamps could still be in his regular (blue) passport"
Thank you sir for being reasonable and logical.
Lol He jyst Fucked himself. Ask jfk and Nixon what it's like to Fuck with the CIA.
It's not a pissing contest
Second. I'm having trouble following.This thread moves so fast and OP isn't updated with many of the details. Can someone please recap?
What's all this about hooker piss and Prague etc?
Second. I'm having trouble following.
This thread moves so fast and OP isn't updated with many of the details. Can someone please recap?
What's all this about hooker piss and Prague etc?
I'm a vehement Trump opponent, who proudly voted for Clinton (and encouraged others to do so), but I also think that photo is so overused and misused. I also hate it because every thread it's posted in, it's irrelevant, and derails the conversation and focuses on Laura Ingraham. Plus the "Look at the whole photo it's even worse!" If you *actually* look at the whole photo, you realize the banner of Trump is about 50 feet behind the podium and completely out of view to whoever is speaking, and that the Getty images photo is making it look like she's Nazi saluting right to an adjacent photo of Trump.
Don't have to be a Trump supporter to think that photo being posted, alleging that LAura Igram is giving a NAzi salute, is ridiculous crap
I also hate it because it's so fucking irrelevant to this thread, and yet, here we are talking about an inconsequential photo of an inconsequential person doing something inconsequential.
I just realized the man doesn't even drink, he did this sober.
This is the summary you need to read that encapsulates all of the key talking points.This thread moves so fast and OP isn't updated with many of the details. Can someone please recap?
What's all this about hooker piss and Prague etc?
For people to argue over it like you're doing now.
Isnt that what this thread is about? I dont think anything has been proven yet.Is the Trump lawyer meeting RIS in Prague good intel? Shouldn't that be it's own thread?
Second. I'm having trouble following.
Summary I came up with:
>8+ years of communication between him and Kremlin, and 5+ year relationship of cultivating/supporting/assisting Trump by Russia.
>They offered him real estate deals IN RUSSIA to further ensnare him, but he declined.
>Russia has dirt on Trump watching Russian prostitutes give golden showers.
>Detailed claims of bilateral intelligence sharing back and forth between Trump and Putin. Trump had DNC moles and used US as well as foreign hackers. Trump got info on his opponents, Putin got info on Russian oligarchs + families living in US.
>They used the pension system that Russian diplomats used to transfer information back and forth to/from each other as well. It mentions tens of thousands of dollars were sent in addition to the money.
>Russia's main goal appears to be driving wedges to cause divisions in the West. They aided Jill Stein, Carter Page and Michael Flynn (the latter two being members of Trump's team) in doing so.
>Main goal of DNC emails appeared to be swinging Sanders voters to Trump.
>Russia and Trump had a mutual agreement on the DNC hack. Russia released the emails to Wikileaks in return for Trump removing mention of Russian invasion of Crimea in favor of talking about NATO financial commitments in Eastern Europe and the Baltics. Putin wanted people to stop talking Ukraine while also undermining NATO.
>Trump's most damning financial commitments are actually in China and other emerging markets. He's paid large bribes and kickbacks there that would've destroyed his campaign if made public.
>Hilariously, when Trump said he had few Russian financial investments, that was true, but he has actively sought them out only to be denied. He apparently settled for extensive sexual favors there instead
>Trump lawyer Cohen had clandestine meeting with Kremlin operatives in August, held in Prague to try to make it seem less suspicious.
>Ukrainian President that Putin installed confided to Putin he DID provide ex-campaign manager Manafort w/ kickbacks that were previously reported. Left no paper trail.
>Russia pissed this has gotten so much media coverage. They hoped to push for improved Russian-US relationships regardless of who was elected. Ancillary goal with Clinton was to drive her positions further from Obama's in event she won - they're happy both candidates were anti-TPP because they viewed that as bad for them.
>Trump has bribed Russian business interests but worked diligently to obfuscate and eliminate paper trail. Also engaged in Russian sex parties but has likewise bribed or coerced witnesses to be silent. They do believe a particular Russian businessman was intricately linked to Trump would know details.
>Manafort/Page/Cohen all highly compromised. They/Trump were apparently offered up to 19% stake in a Russian oil company Rosneft by its president if they could successfully get Western Russian sanctions lifted. Page expressed interest in this deal, saying sanctions would be lifted.
>Once the sh*t started to hit the fan, Cohen was heavily involved in trying to cover up the relationship between Carter/Manafort/himself and Russia.
>Mentions that the Trump team AND Russia both paid Romanian hackers to help sabotage Democrats.
>Overall goal of electing Trump was to destabilize Western and world order in Russia's favor since he was anti-establishment and so divisive.
Let me know if something needs added or if I screwed something up.
u/JustDandy07 is the man. Added a bunch of stuff.
u/whiskystoned and u/sylviecerise made sure I had my TPP bit correct - Russia was AGAINST TPP.
u/Adrian_Bock raised a great point. Trump specifically used Presidential Suite in Russian Ritz-Carlton where Obama/Michelle stayed for his golden shower episode(s) to defile the bed. That's some depraved shit.
u/niknight_ml mentioned that Trump may have helped actually fund the DNC hack itself.
I wish the piss stuff would get ignored and focus on the other things.
Oh, yeah. This kind of bad reputation will make both the Republicans & Trump go down in flames & will give Democrats the chance to recover.
Be interesting to know if this is a Pence move, and Trump is fighting a battle on two fronts.
Apologies if this has been discussed before (the thread is real large) but what evidence do we have about the veracity of this report? It's all very damning, but very easily dismissed as "fake news" - even if parts of the report are not true it can poison the well for the rest. I don't doubt that buzzfeed have the report for real, I'm wondering as to how much of the report is true or at least reliable. Obviously we can't prove that the FSB has evidence on Trump, but what do we know about the nature of this information to use as a source of veracity?
And for the record, I'm not doing "just asking questions" bullshit to steer the conversation off. I really do want to know more.
It's on this page. It looks like they weren't 100% sure where the meeting place was, but it was likely Prague.Is the Trump lawyer meeting RIS in Prague good intel? Shouldn't that be it's own thread?
So it looks like this has all died down, huh?
So it looks like this has all died down, huh?
People don't get that Putin just wants to watch America burn.
So it looks like this has all died down, huh?
So it looks like this has all died down, huh?
Interesting stuff here in the last hour. She seems to know who wrote the thing (a Republican), and she thinks it's legit.
https://twitter.com/LizMair
honestly, the best thing to do would be to walk away for a few days, if not a week, and then return after the dust has settled. people will come up with bullshit and speculation to keep the story interesting when there aren't additional details. you'll save yourself a lot of time and frustration if you let it play itself out and follow the major points as the unfold, if they unfold.I'm afraid to stop refreshing because I don't want to miss anything. I am afraid to go to sleep because I know, when I wake up, this thread will be twice as long and it will be impossible to catch up. I'll just have to start fresh tomorrow, endlessly refreshing, hoping something, anything, good comes from this.
It's amazing how gaf can manage to derail a thread about a Russian piss orgy the president elect had while colluding with them to help him win the election by hacking the government over some dumb debate over some stupid person did or did not do a hand gesturePlease stop the Laura Ingraham derail.
If this isn't verified? Nothing.Holy shit. I just woke up. What's gonna happen to him though?
I'm not really knowleagble in US politics.
So it looks like this has all died down, huh?
Liz Mair isn't the most responsible person in the world.
She was responsible for that ad attacking Trump's wife that Ted Cruz got blamed for.
She also claimed there would be a couple of big anti-Trump stories in the last week of the election that were as bad as "Grab the Pussy" but never materialized.
So it looks like this has all died down, huh?
Holy shit. I just woke up. What's gonna happen to him though?
I'm not really knowleagble in US politics.
I'm shocked that bernie or busters got played like a damn fiddle, shocked.From Reddit
Agreed. The other information is way more damning and believable, to me. If there is teeth to the report and the story, and the piss stuff ultimately proves to be made up by 4chan/etc, then it will undermine the entire story.
But people are so busy patting themselves on the back with piss jokes that they're not able to see that.
Apologies if this has been discussed before (the thread is real large) but what evidence do we have about the veracity of this report? It's all very damning, but very easily dismissed as "fake news" - even if parts of the report are not true it can poison the well for the rest. I don't doubt that buzzfeed have the report for real, I'm wondering as to how much of the report is true or at least reliable. Obviously we can't prove that the FSB has evidence on Trump, but what do we know about the nature of this information to use as a source of veracity?
And for the record, I'm not doing "just asking questions" bullshit to steer the conversation off. I really do want to know more.