You know, what happens if it's a guy with a bad credit card or something? Does the campaign still succeed if Amazon can't get the money from them?Is people trolling kickstarter campaigns really a serious issue?
Yep, it would be nice if KS would look into those cases and ban those people from running a project or pledging in the future.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that those 10k pledges are either under-the-table investors, or close family members of the development team. It really wouldn't surprise me if as much as 30-40% of the overall pledge amount is shenanigans. No way we'll ever know, and that's something that'd be pretty damn easy to cover up.
Is people trolling kickstarter campaigns really a serious issue?
You know, what happens if it's a guy with a bad credit card or something? Does the campaign still succeed if Amazon can't get the money from them?
More things I didn't even think to think about when it comes to this stuff.
That's more than a tad cynical, but I can why you might think that.I'd bet dollars to donuts that those 10k pledges are either under-the-table investors, or close family members of the development team. It really wouldn't surprise me if as much as 30-40% of the overall pledge amount is shenanigans. No way we'll ever know, and that's something that'd be pretty damn easy to cover up.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that those 10k pledges are either under-the-table investors, or close family members of the development team. It really wouldn't surprise me if as much as 30-40% of the overall pledge amount is shenanigans. No way we'll ever know, and that's something that'd be pretty damn easy to cover up.
It's a really old, dumb expression. Here's the history of it: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollars_to_donutsThat's more than a tad cynical, but I can why you might think that.
Could it not be wait and see-ers who felt it would only be worth committing if it got to a certain stage?
Also, dollars to donuts? How does that work? Haven't heard the saying before.
Huh, neat.It's a really old, dumb expression. Here's the history of it: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollars_to_donuts
It's fun to learn!
While I don't think this is the case here: shady practices keep the economy running and good morals in flattering contrast. It's win-win.I'd bet dollars to donuts that those 10k pledges are either under-the-table investors, or close family members of the development team. It really wouldn't surprise me if as much as 30-40% of the overall pledge amount is shenanigans. No way we'll ever know, and that's something that'd be pretty damn easy to cover up.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that those 10k pledges are either under-the-table investors, or close family members of the development team. It really wouldn't surprise me if as much as 30-40% of the overall pledge amount is shenanigans. No way we'll ever know, and that's something that'd be pretty damn easy to cover up.
So if the lost money would put them below 500k, would they retroactively lose funding for the entire project?Not really, since most other Kickstarters either shoot past their goal or get nowhere near it. Close calls like Republic aren't commonplace
The backers get notified and they are given a two week amnesty period where they can correct their credit card info. If not they don't get any rewards. I think Double fine only lost $2000 to bad backers.
I don't think so. They'd just not get the money which didn't clear for whatever reason.So if the lost money would put them below 500k, would they retroactively lose funding for the entire project?
Yep, it would be nice if KS would look into those cases and ban those people from running a project or pledging in the future.
It's gonna make it. Hodapp's crow-eating will be glorious.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that those 10k pledges are either under-the-table investors, or close family members of the development team. It really wouldn't surprise me if as much as 30-40% of the overall pledge amount is shenanigans. No way we'll ever know, and that's something that'd be pretty damn easy to cover up.
Really? Which Kickstarters?i've heard about large backers pulling out right at the end on a number of kickstarters.
That's putting words in his mouth.I respect a guy who walk away from Halo 4 because he believes that the game don´t have enough soul. Good luck with the new game.
No where does he say it doesn't have enough soul.Kotaku Interview said:"The Halo I wanted to build was fundamentally different and I don't think I had built enough credibility to see such a crazy endeavor through."
This doesn't mean Payton thinks Halo 4 will be a bad game. The core team is top flight, and they are there because they want to make the best Halo they can. It's just not the Halo Payton wanted to make.
I put in $60 for the Intelligentsia+ edition.
I want this game to be good and I want there to be so many bitter tears about it.
This is a surprising/unbelievable turn of events.
This is a surprising/unbelievable turn of events.
$20k left
Just crossed $470,000. Only $30,00 left in 11 hours. They can do this!
How will they handle iOS versions for backers outside the US? I thought promo codes on iTunes were US only, unless that's changed? We could set up US accounts to redeem them on, but I doubt everyone outside the US who's backed the project has done that.
$480,000 pledged with 8 hours to go....
What a comeback.
Hmm, I'm confused about something. I pledged $50 the day this went live but obviously things have changed since then (PC/Mac announcement). The $50 or more category now says "Republique for the platform of your choice" even though some of the lower ones include both the iOS and desktop version. So do I only get the game on one platform or what?
Good morning guys, how's thi--
Holy shit!
Ah, I see. Thanks. I'll probably just stay at $50 and go for the PC version.Yeah, $50 is for one version of the game, or you can up your pledge to $60 to get both.
This is probably only the start of some supreme levels of bitterness. Should be fun to watch.