cormack12
Gold Member
Never say never. My point was that I hope GAF grows positively over time, and doesn't slip as numbers increase, staff turns over, etc. Era had a catastrophic shift in moderation in 2018. In mid 2018, bans skyrocketed after founding members quit, new mods were promoted, etc. It happened in the space of a few weeks. You could argue the site was just showing its true face, but I think any site can go sour quite quickly under the right circumstances if the wrong people get into power positions.
Something that stood out to me about Era as 2018 led into 2019 and beyond was that a lot of aggressive, spiteful users didn't have an actual argument to give. They didn't join Era to defend their self-righteous opinions, after all. What they had instead was a report button, "yikes", and a moderation team who didn't care about the ToS. As far as I know, people on modern GAF get banned for breaking rules. And there's transparency there. I think there's a public ban list somewhere? I know there's always murky ground around "trolling" bans. But at least you can discuss bans on here. On Era, questioning a ban is grounds for banning. That destroys all pretense of transparency, openness, and honest from the community. A community is held together with rules that are enforced consistently and fairly.
The problem isn;t necessarily the replacement mods there, the problem is the small group of power hungry, insane mods have gone up in the halls of power/influence. How the f do you read anything of Nepenthes and think they are stable enough to be a moderator or facilitator to any discussion? Here we have actual footage of Evilore approaching the new mod Soapy Wooder to join GAFs team.
'Lore said 'do you accept this great honour and position of power?' and then soapy replied
Then 'lore was like