Three new reviews, one of these have scans but those aren't allowed here.
Play Magazine (UK) gives it an 8.8/10.
OPM NL/BE gives it an 8/10
NAG Magazine gives it a 58/100
Some details:
Play says:
Issue 223, which goes on sale on Thursday and has begun reaching subscribers, carries a six-page review of Capcom's survival-horror and describes it "as a Resident Evil worthy of modern times."
"This is arguably the best co-op game available on PS3 alongside Borderlands 2," says Play.
The review details each individual section - describing Leon's as "the sort of action that would never have been possible with the old Resident Evil framework" and Jake's as "host to Capcom's more ambitious ideas", while Chris' section is held up as the weakest. Ada Wong's campaign is described as "a surprisingly generous addition".
"While long-term Resident Evil fans might still be disappointed by the nod towards action over horror, Capcom finally has the confidence and know-how to pull it off. It's big, it's brutal, it's ballsy and most of all, it's back," Play conclude.
NAG says:
"This is more than just an average action game or a shameful Resident Evil; this is a prime example of what is so wrong with the big publisher, AAA mentality in this industry. RE6 does nothing but take the piss out of the customers who either expect it to be another excellent Resi game because of its title, or a sweet action game because of its visuals. Resident Evil 6 is neither.
+Looks incredible
+Leon's campaign is only half-bad
+Cool multiplayer Modes
-Lacking narrative
-Poorly implemented copycat game mechanics
-This is no Resident Evil"
REVIEW TALLY THUS FAR:
OPM Italy: 9/10
OPM US: 9/10
Play Magazine (Uk): 8.8/10
Maniac! Magazine (Germany): 8.8/10
OPM NL/BE: 8/10
LEVEL Magazine (Sweden): 7/10
NAG: 58/100