I've seen a buncha bullshit fans say on the internetMCU is filled with humor because Thanos is childish in nature.
That statement is pretty high up there
I've seen a buncha bullshit fans say on the internetMCU is filled with humor because Thanos is childish in nature.
So is not good to have this in the DCU because it doesnt follow every detail? I understand.
Been that said, hopefully they use the anti-life equation in Justice League. Sounds very interesting.
I believe I've seen every superhero movie released in the past decade or two, and I don't know what the fuck the anti-life equation is, who Darkseid is, or anything about what happens before Darkseid arrives. That payoff, which was pulled directly from that poster's ass, would be a TERRIBLE excuse for making a handful of gloomy and terrible movies. You're free to love them, but there's no way what you're talking about is comparable to what the MCU did with Loki's scepter.
And YOU are the one that brought up the analogy, so why are you pissed when people tell you it's a terrible one?
Truly iconic stuff right there. That scene and the following sequence is Snyder at the peak of his powers...goddamn. I need to watch BvS again.
Nah, some of your complaints fell into "I want this to be a problem so people can stop complaining about what I like" territoryMy thread got closed.Just when I was about to rebut and everything.
I still think I defended my points. The two movies are very similar and the point was people's motivations for criticising one movie instead of the other for faults found in the better movie whilst ignoring pretty much the same criticisms.
You know, all of those psychic visions that Batman is famous for having, what with Batman's well known superpower to see possible futures for no reason.Man what the fuck is this foolishness
The last thing Batman v Superman honestly needed was an extended cut. It honestly needed the complete opposite and needed a reduced cut.
-- Cut the Justice League teases
-- Cut the nightmares
-- Cut Luthor
-- Cut Doomsday
-- Cut Wonder Woman
The JL and nightmare sequences were honestly unnecessary to the plot. Doomsday is a stupid video game final boss stapled on to the end of the movie. Wonder Woman is the best part of the movie, but she's simultaneously the most unnecessary part of the movie because she only ties into the Justice League and Doomsday crap. Make the movie purely about Superman and Batman having a major idealistic clash regarding crime fighting and end the movie with them resolving their differences and realizing their two sides of the same coin. You don't even need the Lex Luthor pulling strings in the background shit either, the movie did a fine job of establishing how Batman and Superman clash.
Hah, all of your weak criticisms could be answered by actually paying attention to the movie. They were all literally spelled out in the film, as many posters pointed out.My thread got closed.Just when I was about to rebut and everything.
I still think I defended my points. The two movies are very similar and the point was people's motivations for criticising one movie instead of the other for faults found in the better movie whilst ignoring pretty much the same criticisms.
Im not upset, i already accepted the responses and said I understand, thats however doesnt mean I dont want to see it happening in some form as it appeared in some sort both in MCU and the DCU as well.Spoiler for WOnder Womanim talking about Ares in WW
Nah, some of your complaints fell into "I want this to be a problem so people can stop complaining about what I like" territory
Then i channeled the ridiculous BVS complaints perfectly then.
You are not getting my point but Im not sure if its good to keep posting Wonder Woman spoilers given how recent te movie is, so, I will just stop.Your WW spoiler isn't at all what that person was talking about, though. And it happens and is taken care of a century before the events of MoS and BvS...
Then i channeled the ridiculous BVS complaints perfectly then.
Amazing.Bleepey, that was an amazing thread.
I'm sorry I missed it.
All I would have added was that the film was as you described AND looked like a TV movie. Hooray for the Marvel Centipedal Universe.
I love BvS and can't even consider suicide squad a movie. It's one of the worst i've ever watched as a comic book fan, as someone who watches movies sometimes and as a human being. It's so awful that the only thing that can compare to it is that godawful spirit movie made by Frank Miller.That's where I am. There was a lot in BvS to like, despite it's problems, and the extended edition improved it further. It's dour, Lex is weird, the knightmare and shared-universe stuff dragged the pacing down, and MARTHA became a meme. On the other hand, it has top tier visuals, a good soundtrack, several good performances (particularly from Irons) and the singular best fight scene in all comic books movies to date. The opening scene in Metropolis was pretty incredible too. Suicide Squad by contrast was absolutely irredeemable. It's confusing to look at, can't decide what it wants to be tonally, has an even more nonsensical story than BvS, is filled with bad performances, suffers from the worst editing I've seen in a mainstream movie and has so much licensed music it's constantly distracting for the first half hour.
Hah, all of your weak criticisms could be answered by actually paying attention to the movie. They were all literally spelled out in the film, as many posters pointed out.
Your WW spoiler isn't at all what that person was talking about, though. And it happens and is taken care of a century before the events of MoS and BvS...
Like which one? My Africa complaint(s)? The sarcasm in my post was because people found it inconceivable for Superman to be blamed in Africa when there is only one witness to the "attack"and there's only the evidence Lex fabricated. Yet people will accept that the Avengers would be blamed when there are 100s of eyes saying it was all Crossbones fault.
Or was it the Black Panther argument? I used that argument to highlight the dumb argument that "oh Batman for the world's smartest detective would find it believable that Superman could cause an international incident" This is despite the fact Batman already doesn't like him cos of Metropolis. Or why would he play detective when it's perfectly rational he'd find it plausible the man who engaged in a multi-storey street fight years prior could cause collateral damage. To add to that why would he go and play detective when there's a senate hearing like 2 days after the incident.Don't get me started on Zemo's plan I am applying the same fine-toothed comb scrutiny to CW as BVS to show, the double standards.
The comments about the Bucky thing was to highlight the absurdity to shit on BVS for the Martha scene and why the poster child for "my parents are dead" super hero trope would be greatly affected by someone who on their deathbed only thought about the life of someone called Martha. It wasn't a way to make cheap ambiguously gay duo jokes it was to highlight how CW had Cap go to the ends of the earth for him. Even though if you looked at the evidence, it would make no sense for that to be the case
Some day I want to watch this version because I've heard it improves the movie. On the other hand this was one of the worst movies I have ever seen in a theater and I don't know if I want to take the gamble that I won't just waste more time.
I honestly thought the Luthor casting was on point. He did a good job with the 'unhinged genius' motif, and his bizarre obsession with superman/god.
Even go so far as to say he was one of the best parts of the movie.
Some day I want to watch this version because I've heard it improves the movie. On the other hand this was one of the worst movies I have ever seen in a theater and I don't know if I want to take the gamble that I won't just waste more time.
The only good thing UC added really is showing Clark being a reporter and retconing the whole Batman branding criminal so they get killed in prison.
This one actually made Batman even worse, at least in the original cut I didn't got that. Fuck this Batman, the guy was a maniac thirsty for blood.The only good thing UC added really is showing Clark being a reporter and retconing the whole Batman branding criminal so they get killed in prison.
I hope one day you'll understand two thingsLike which one? My Africa complaint(s)? The sarcasm in my post was because people found it inconceivable for Superman to be blamed in Africa when there is only one witness to the "attack"and there's only the evidence Lex fabricated. Yet people will accept that the Avengers would be blamed when there are 100s of eyes saying it was all Crossbones fault.
Or was it the Black Panther argument? I used that argument to highlight the dumb argument that "oh Batman for the world's smartest detective would find it believable that Superman could cause an international incident" This is despite the fact Batman already doesn't like him cos of Metropolis. Or why would he play detective when it's perfectly rational he'd find it plausible the man who engaged in a multi-storey street fight years prior could cause collateral damage. To add to that why would he go and play detective when there's a senate hearing like 2 days after the incident.Don't get me started on Zemo's plan I am applying the same fine-toothed comb scrutiny to CW as BVS to show, the double standards.
The comments about the Bucky thing was to highlight the absurdity to shit on BVS for the Martha scene and why the poster child for "my parents are dead" super hero trope would be greatly affected by someone who on their deathbed only thought about the life of someone called Martha. It wasn't a way to make cheap ambiguously gay duo jokes it was to highlight how CW had Cap go to the ends of the earth for him. Even though if you looked at the evidence, it would make no sense for that to be the case
It's fucking fantastic.
I wish more superhero movies aimed for the stars like this. It might have not quite gotten there, but it got far enough.
And yes, best Batman.
Felt like they were trying to imitate Dark Knight Joker.Eisenberg's Luthor was worse than Leto's Joker. What a stupid take on the character.
Eisenberg's Luthor was worse than Leto's Joker.
A murderous, sulking, nondetective, rage machine is the best Batman?
Better than Adam West or Keaton or Bale? Batman Begins?
Reality has no place here.
Well, Batfleck does do detective work at several points in the movie. Keaton kills more people than cancer, so he's probably not the best point of comparison. Even the weakest of the Nolan films is still notably better than BvS, but Christian Bale isn't that much better than Ben Afleck in the role. They're both good.
A murderous, sulking, nondetective, rage machine is the best Batman?
Better than Adam West or Keaton or Bale? Batman Begins?
Reality has no place here.
Well, Batfleck does do detective work at several points in the movie. Keaton kills more people than cancer, so he's probably not the best point of comparison. Even the weakest of the Nolan films is still notably better than BvS, but Christian Bale isn't that much better than Ben Afleck in the role. They're both good.
DerZuhälter;241303534 said:It was horrible. But the cinema cut was even worse. It's incomprehensable to me how anyone could have thought after watching that cut "We have a hit on our hands!".
You can't polish a turd.
You know how some really good actors get roles where they have nothing to work with. Take that concept, and apply it to everything about this batman. It's emblematic in every aspect of his character.
For example, the design. Like, you could make a strong argument that this is technically the best crafted Batsuit we have with how it looks like a real suit, but shows it's comic book origins strongly (unlike Nolan's Batsuit which looked like a modified body armor suit...which is exactly hwat it was.). But I personally hate the design of it. I hate the tiny bat ears, the fat bat, and how there it's completely grey (I like something like a gold belt to provide color seperation, and the Nolans bat suit often looked bluish due to the lighting)
Or his Batmobile. I actually think it looks great in design other than the front central rail gun he has on it (it's not even a "batman shouldn't have guns" thing, it just looks out of place), and it's sleek design marries the Tumbler look with the classic look nicely. However, it's one of the worst car chase sequences I've ever seen. I could never tell where he was in relation to the cars he was chasing, so all the explosions just felt like a lot of noise to me.
And of course there is Batman's actual role in the story and personality, which has all been discussed at length.
There are genuinely positive elements to Batfleck, but literally every piece is used wrong, which comes up for me as the worst live action Batman of them. Which is a shame because Ben Affleck is someone who could really bring him to life if he were given the right stuff.
![]()
Awww yeah, that's the stuff
edit: i know it's tiny, I'm rusty at gif-making
Wonder Woman has built up a lot of good faith.
Justice League will fully redeem DCEU in the eyes of GAF.
Though GAF will put it down to Whedon rescuing the movie rather than praise Snyder :(
At least it wasn't AoU.