If not self defense then at least public service.
To a non-American, robbing a fast food restaurant with an assault rifle seems completely ridiculous. You understand that, right? Or are you just so desensitized now to the presence of these weapons?
From a legal standpoint, if a gun was pulled on you during a robbery, and they walk away afterwards, can you still claim self-defense if you shoot them as they try to get away?
Let's call the gun by its name - AK-47... We don't need 5 pages of trying to define what an "assault rifle' is.
Wouldn't a waffle house have at least one phone inside the establishment? The article mentions nothing about the robber stealing phones, or cutting the power or phone cords, so we're just left to speculate the alternatives here.
Yeah, the carrier was clearly in his legal right to carry his gun, this is more about how he acted in the situation.
From a legal standpoint, if a gun was pulled on you during a robbery, and they walk away afterwards, can you still claim self-defense if you shoot them as they try to get away?
He may not be a good guy, but it sounds like he shot a bad guyWe don't do vigilante justice in modern society. There are several arguments as to why. A "good guy with a gun" doesn't execute someone in the parking lot after following them.
People can't get this through their heads though. It just will never happen. The best we can do is sensible gun control, which I am 100% for! I am not a member of, nor will I join the NRA because I am very opposed to how lax they are about guns and gun control.
People getting shot isn't positive, ever.
From a legal standpoint, if a gun was pulled on you during a robbery, and they walk away afterwards, can you still claim self-defense if you shoot them as they try to get away?
I'm not defending the customer in this case. IMO they were both aggressors and the one trying to steal people's stuff got shot instead of the other guy. Stupid, yes, playing hero looking for glory as if in a videogame, probably not quite the dominant motive as is being assumed.Nobody's really putting up a vigorous defense of the robber, but I'd also argue pursuing the robber after leaving the premises, provoking them as an excuse to play executioner isn't really a stellar "good guy with gun" scenario.
But if the wife is driving, there's reasonable concern that she won't/won't be able to answer her phone. The shooter doesn't know exactly where she is or how close she is, so he decides to risk his own life to potentially keep her out of danger. It's important to remember that these things happen in the blink of an eye and the people involved do not have the luxury to sit at our computers and think about/debate other solutions.
If it were my wife/mom/dad, I'd have done the same thingif I had the balls to.
Well the article says he turned and pointed the AK at the guy before he shot him, so you could get away with it on that. I assume that's why he didn't shoot him in the back instead of calling out to him, and why people in old westerns tell their opponent to go for his gun.
He may not be a good guy, but it sounds like he shot a bad guy
Bad mother fucker
To a non-American, robbing a fast food restaurant with an AK-47 seems completely ridiculous. You understand that, right? Or are you just so desensitized now to the presence of these weapons?
Tons of speculation on a situation on stuff we know nothing about. We know that the person with the AK-47 didn't shoot anyone on the scene, why would you assume he would shot some random person pulling into a restaurant when he is leaving the scene and already got what he came for?
Would you risk the life of your wife on that thought? I'm not trying to sound condescending or sarcastic or anything. Honestly, visualize yourself in that position. Would you?
The way I see it is in the current state of things, if you decide to rob a place with an AK-47, you accept the risk that someone else is also packing and you will be shot, be it police or citizen.
Tons of speculation on a situation on stuff we know nothing about. We know that the person with the AK-47 didn't shoot anyone on the scene, why would you assume he would shot some random person pulling into a restaurant when he is leaving the scene and already got what he came for?
As an American who hasn't even seen an AK-47, it is pretty ridiculous.To a non-American, robbing a fast food restaurant with an AK-47 seems completely ridiculous. You understand that, right? Or are you just so desensitized now to the presence of these weapons?
Would you risk the life of your wife on that thought? I'm not trying to sound condescending or sarcastic or anything. Honestly, visualize yourself in that position. Would you?
Or potentially put her in danger, if his initial encounter with the robber didn't end in a clean kill and instead led to a shootout in the parking lot where a stray bullet could have hit his wife just as she drove in...The shooter doesn't know exactly where she is or how close she is, so he decides to risk his own life to potentially keep her out of danger.
No, of course not. I wouldn't be risking my life, but the life of anybody in that Waffle House (or around that area) that could be caught with stray bullets.
The likelihood of anything happening to her is so astronomically slim. Unless she was pulling into the parking lot at that moment, I don't see how he would have harmed her. Even then, he probably would have just left the scene - he never shot anybody in the restaurant so what would make you think he would shoot somebody after the fact that would pose absolutely no threat?
The wife thing just came off as an excuse because he wanted to kill someone and be a hero.
He probably wasn't the most rational when he did this, not that that's an excuse from scrutiny.Yep.
I'm going to follow someone with an AK-47 and try to put him down, never mind the fact that he hasn't shot anyone, never mind the fact that its an AK-47 and a stray bullet can hit someone in the restaurant, my wife is on her way!
So I take it you have a way to take all the legal and illegal guns off the street? Cause there is a lot of illegal guns.From the member that brought you:
Concealed Carrier Stops Shooting in Progress Outside SC Nightclub
and
Homeowners shoot & kill murder suspect that escaped from jail & broke in their house
again, if nobody had guns, nobody would have to get shot.
The wife thing just came off as an excuse because he wanted to kill someone and be a hero.
He probably wasn't the most rational when he did this, not that that's an excuse from scrutiny.
From the member that brought you:
Concealed Carrier Stops Shooting in Progress Outside SC Nightclub
and
Homeowners shoot & kill murder suspect that escaped from jail & broke in their house
again, if nobody had guns, nobody would have to get shot.
No, it's a Carbine round. Much less powerful than even moderate hunting rifles.Isn't a AK-47 overkill for just about everything?
I agree, however the current reality is the state of things as they are at this moment. It is what it is, until such time as we as a nation can get any headway on the issue.That is why gun's are so fucking dangerous in the hands of a normal civilian. They will act on impulse and put their lives, and everyone else's, in danger.
There was no reason to shoot the guy.
Seriously. What I just read was a story about a guy going out of his way to murder someone.If the intent was, at any point in this story, to have people reconsider this country's absolutely insane gun laws in a more positive light, I don't think that objective was met.
Maybe we, as a society, can eventually get to a point where people can go to a Waffle House and just eat waffles.
If the intent was, at any point in this story, to have people reconsider this country's absolutely insane gun laws in a more positive light, I don't think that objective was met.
Maybe we, as a society, can eventually get to a point where people can go to a Waffle House and just eat waffles.
From the member that brought you:
Concealed Carrier Stops Shooting in Progress Outside SC Nightclub
and
Homeowners shoot & kill murder suspect that escaped from jail & broke in their house
again, if nobody had guns, nobody would have to get shot.
If you consider the racial angle to the situation, there might be more to it than that too.
I dont know why any of you, if placed in that situation would give this guy any benefit of doubt with "oh he hasn't shot anyboy yet" Guns are not toys you can just wave around and say "just kidding bro". I've had family members armed and wave guns around like idiots, you expect an emotionless response to some unknown robber? GTFO
There was definitely an element of 'get my stuff back going on, as well as perhaps a dogmatic sense of 'you won't get away with it'.The justification doesn't work at all.
This is akin to saying why have laws at all if people are just going to break them?OK so we ban guns
How so we stop criminals from getting them?
I know most crimes are committed with legally owned guns. But don't think they will all just magically disappear
I could go on Craigslist right now and buy a gun from someone with no background and for cash
Was going to say that but was afraid of the dog pile and deleted it.The guy didn't want an "uncle Ben" situation on his hands.