agrajag said:Federer's service game takes me back to the days of 90's when there were several guys on the tour who had these devastating serves. It was almost impossible to break these ace-machines' serves. I'm thinking Richard Kraijeck, Samprass, Ivanisevic...
Of all time?agrajag said:If Federer wins this and another Grand Slam, will that give him the #1 ranking?
agrajag said:If Federer wins this and another Grand Slam, will that give him the #1 ranking?
agrajag said:If Federer wins this and another Grand Slam, will that give him the #1 ranking?
Peru said:Well Karlovic has that throne now, of course in contrast to those guys he has nought, absolutely zilch, else to his game, which is why he loses a match with 55 aces. His coach should've told him that he has to play the opponent's serve game as well.
agrajag said:Right. It's just not the same anymore though. You could've mentioned Roddick too, who has the fastest serves ever, but somehow his serving is not that effective. I haven't seen any of Karlovic's matches though, does he do that consistently or was that just that one Davis Cup match?
Peru said:The 55 ace loss was in this French Open. He does that constantly, yes, his matches go to tie-break so often you wouldn't believe it. Boring guy.
agrajag said:Man, I should start playing tennis again :-/
agrajag said:Federer NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. HIT A FUCKING ACE NOW
nny said:Yeah...I don't pick a racket in an year or more...hey, at least Grand Slam Tennis is coming out for the Wii soon ;P
Peru said:Yeah I think so, it might depend on the pre-Wimbledon tour, but of course Nadal has withdrawn from Queens, so if Federer wins Wimbledon he should be back at 1. Of course he might be spent after this win and not have the drive to take the grass cup as well.
John Dunbar said:Doesn't Nadal lose some points from the olympics as well?
John Dunbar said:Doesn't Nadal lose some points from the olympics as well?
agrajag said:I thought Olympics don't affect the rankings.