He's saying that Jeff was reviewing games since Meg Turney was a toddler, not him reviewing games since he was a toddler.
Unfortunately, those two mean the same thing in this case.
I'm the same. I think Persona 4 may be the only game we agree upon, but I still really value his opinion and sense of humor. The rest of the GB crew, not so much, but I still catch up with the site/podcast every once and a while because of him.Jeff's gaming tastes do not mesh with mine AT ALL.
I still happily listen to him talk about video games because he knows what he fuck is up, he's entertaining and funny, and isn't the corporate shill the Rooster Teeth hacks are.
I've gotta admit that I've never really liked Gertsmann myself since like others have mentioned, his tastes are drastically different from mine.
Still, I've got mad respect for him as a figure in the industry
Please don't go there. It doesn't matter what else she's done with her life. Let's judge her opinions and credibility through the comments at hand and her work on videogames.
That's probably enough and pretty self evident without bringing up irrelevant stuff to the table to muddy the criticism.
I have yet to play Fallout 4, but 3/5 seems unlikely (not impossible mind you, I've seen great series take a dive). With that being said, Rooster Teeth itself has greatly declined, and is hardly a valid source for an objective review. Haven't they essentially relegated themselves to "let's plays?"
A lot of people - and RT included in this it seems - cannot seem to wrap their head around the fact that someone can both like a game, and be critical of it too.
Can't wait to see what RT say about Jeff's comment this week on the podcast. He said perhaps people should have higher standards about accepting buggy/glitchy games like FO4.
He also said the game does some amazing things that other games simply do not achieve. But at the same time, it gets real rough on console. It's one of the only reviews out there that talks about the techical quality of the game. It blows my mind that other game writers never mention shitty performance or bugs etc. It's like writing a car review and brushing over now it drives.
Didn't RT start out as an Achievement site?
It helps if you think of it as a standard deviation and not a percentage. Gerstmann is saying that the console version is a standard deviation worse and I think that is a completely defensible position.
Didn't RT start out as an Achievement site?
I respect Jeff G a hella lot but his tastes clearly don't match up with mine and he is clearly jaded. Still one of the best voices in gaming media by a far margin though.
Who the fuck tales Gertsman seriously, dude is a joke, his idiotic hate for Yoshi games makes it even worse
I know that you can only review your personal experience with a game, and a game like Fallout by default lends itself to diverse user experiences. With that in mind, I've played FO4 on PS4 for upwards of 60 hours now and I've yet to come across anything that would justify its lesser classification. Maybe it's just my playstyle, but I've only encountered about 6 or 7 harsh drops, and even then they only lasted for 3-4 seconds.
Can't wait to see what RT say about Jeff's comment this week on the podcast. He said perhaps people should have higher standards about accepting buggy/glitchy games like FO4.
He also said the game does some amazing things that other games simply do not achieve. But at the same time, it gets real rough on console. It's one of the only reviews out there that talks about the techical quality of the game. It blows my mind that other game writers never mention shitty performance or bugs etc. It's like writing a car review and brushing over how it drives.
Didn't RT start out as an Achievement site?
Jeff's gaming tastes do not mesh with mine AT ALL.
I still happily listen to him talk about video games because he knows what he fuck is up, he's entertaining and funny, and isn't the corporate shill the Rooster Teeth hacks are.
Hahaha oh my goodness this is embarrassing.
They talk about it in this video, they are negative about it but still trying to figure it out. I selected just one part where they are negative if you don't have long to watch the full thing.People going on about RT defending the Xbox One reveal, didn't GB also basically defend the DRM or am I getting mixed up?
Finding it hard to find shit online about it, but I'm sure I remember them downplaying it.
His rant against Yoshi as a character is so passionate, that even though I've never played the games, I love those rants! XD
All I did was search for these people online having never heard of them. Those are results I got back which were much to my surprise. Don't blame me for search results.
I am judging her on her opinions and comments though. That Mixlr bit was damning as fuck. Not what Google surfaced to the top of search results.
Don't dismiss all youtubers. There are some YouTube reviewers like superbunnyhop and mathewmattosis that are better than most journalist/reviewers.YouTubers, indeed the ethical game coverage we deserve.
I cannot believe people get away with that stuff on GAF. That seems like some Gamefaqs level of discussion. People seriously care that much about what a game scores on Metacritic? This is the same reason I tend to stay out of any kickstarter or NPD threads.
They talk about it in this video, they are negative about it but still trying to figure it out. I selected just one part where they are negative if you don't have long to watch the full thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=1StPJgWkN-U#t=722
I think from memory in their game of the year deliberations the xbox one reveal was the fail of the year or something. Very harshly talked about at least.
RoosterTeeth have been known to shill for companies. As if their Halo videos and years of promotion with Microsoft wasnt enough of a hint.
Its almost as bad as this.
Is this a Joke?Because it is probably true.
I am sorry I will forever choose to watch GianBomb over any youtube, hipster try hard, click-baiting channel like Rooster Teeth
And it wasn't because of the drm, it was because of Microsofts flip floppy stance.
http://www.giantbomb.com/articles/giant-bomb-s-2013-game-of-the-year-awards-day-four/1100-4806/Hottest Mess
Xbox One
This business is cyclical. What comes up must come down, and arrogance is often punished. It happened to Nintendo, it happened to Sony, and now it’s happened to Microsoft. Xbox One was the last new console to be revealed, but on the day Microsoft pulled back the curtain, no one was talking about games or its partnership with the NFL. Instead, everyone focused on what the company was taking away, especially how the company’s digital shift was stripping away some rights consumers had over physical games. Part of it was a communication issue, but much of it was tone deaf policy.
"If you're backwards compatible, you're really backwards."
Remember that?
It didn’t help Microsoft’s case when Sony decided to twist the knife at E3, declaring PlayStation 4 as a console that would let things remain as they are. (How many times do we cheer for the status quo?) Who knows what ultimately prompted Microsoft to make the decision it did on June 19, but the facts remain the same: it was a complete reversal of its DRM policies. No more always on requirement. No restrictions on trading physical game discs. It was all switched off. It was an enormous admission it had read the market wrong, and the company didn't do itself any favors by pretending they were "too ahead of the curve."
The changes didn’t stop there, either. Microsoft eventually ditched its Kinect requirement for Xbox One, though it stuck by its decision to keep the device in the box and part of the interface. To make such drastic changes in the middle of finalizing its new console was an unprecedented move, one that made the next-gen race even wilder than we could have ever anticipated. Crazy! (Don Mattrick even left!)
[snipping to the last paragraph of the article, on the Xbox One change]
It is easy to think consumers don’t have a voice, that “voting with your dollars” is a cliche. For the most part, that's probably true. But when consumers speak loud enough, sometimes they listen. And win.
Well, someone linked to the 2Human video and there was this golden thing from the past in the related videos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvj0wcNpKQs
So stupid, so awesome.
rooster teeth hipster?
dude giantbomb is way more hipster than rooster teeth