• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rumor: Possible Pokemon Sun and Moon Chinese Leaks [SPOILERS]

Playing Pokemon Go, further reinforces how trash and over designed the new Pokemon are.
Ok? I'm strictly talking about how the designs of the new Pokemon are horribly over designed, filled with too many intricate pieces and colors that detract from the simplicity that the older Pokemon's had.

Now they just look like Digimon's and that sucks. Hopefully that concept art is a bunch of phooey.

Ok
 
Ok? I'm strictly talking about how the designs of the new Pokemon are horribly over designed, filled with too many intricate pieces and colors that detract from the simplicity that the older Pokemon's had.

Now they just look like Digimon's and that sucks. Hopefully that concept art is a bunch of phooey.

We all love the simplicity and beauty of such amazing designs as Magmar /s
 

GoldStarz

Member
Ok? I'm strictly talking about how the designs of the new Pokemon are horribly over designed, filled with too many intricate pieces and colors that detract from the simplicity that the older Pokemon's had.

Now they just look like Digimon's and that sucks. Hopefully that concept art is a bunch of phooey.

Okay. And I'm just telling you that this isn't a Pokemon Go discussion thread nor is it your platform to bash current designs and put Gen I designs on a pedastal. Literally nothing you are talking about has anything to do with the discussion at hand. If you wanna go into the Pokemon Community thread or Pokemon ORAS thread to talk about it, be my guest, but I really don't think you'll get a warm welcome there either. If you want hit up a thread to talk about this, I suggest the Pokemon Go thread, but I can't say how shared your opinion will be there, I haven't been. See ya.
 

wmlk

Member
The Digimon argument would work on some level if the damn Pokémon in that rumoured concept art actually looked like Digimon.
 

Azuran

Banned
Dunno. Personally I think the gen 1 pokemon had an excellent growth from starter to final form, Cyndaquil and Mudkip were also great to watch grow up, and more recently Snivy was total class in all of its forms.

There was no excellent growth from Squirtle to Blastoise.

Garbage final evolutions that make no sense have been a staple for starters since the very first day.
 

brinstar

Member
I'm surprised people are still bringing up the "they look like Digimon!!!!" thing in 2016 like that means anything to anyone. There's no rule that a Pokemon should not have detail to its design-- they're no longer designed to be displayed on freakin' Game Boy hardware.
 

Azuran

Banned
I'm surprised people are still bringing up the "they look like Digimon!!!!" thing in 2016 like that means anything to anyone. There's no rule that a Pokemon should not have detail to its design-- they're no longer designed to be displayed on freakin' Game Boy hardware.

In Pokemon talks, "they look like Digimon" always means "I'm a certified idiot that doesn't know shit about Pokemon AND Digimon so you obviously shouldn't listen to anything I have to say because you'll only get stupider like me if you do"
 

Vena

Member
There was no excellent growth from Squirtle to Blastoise.

Garbage final evolutions that make no sense have been a staple for starters since the very first day.

A turtle -> A bigger turtle -> A bigger turtle with cannons.

This seems perfectly logical to me, and is how turtles mature in the wild too.
 

GoldStarz

Member
A turtle -> A bigger turtle -> A bigger turtle with cannons.

This seems perfectly logical to me, and is how turtles mature in the wild too.

It's true, I fear for my life everyday that a turtle will pop out of the nearby creek and cannon bomb my house to nothing.
 
There was no excellent growth from Squirtle to Blastoise.

Garbage final evolutions that make no sense have been a staple for starters since the very first day.

Nah, squirtle was pretty straight forward, even though it lost the P-Wing ears and big bushy tail, Blastoise still looked like something that could be derived from the first two forms. Blaziken, Samurott, and Greninja are the only ones that made me raise an eyebrow
 

Azuran

Banned
A turtle -> A bigger turtle -> A bigger turtle with cannons.

This seems perfectly logical to me, and is how turtles mature in the wild too.

There was absolutely no indication that Wartortle was going to growth a set of artificial human weapons. It's just as bad as Magmortar or Rhyperior, two Pokemon that get maligned for the exact same reason.

The only thing Blastoise did was completely ruin Squirtle for 20 years until GF hopefully comes to their senses one day and finally decides to retcon the biggest mistake they have ever done.
 

GoldStarz

Member
Nah, squirtle was pretty straight forward, even though it lost the P-Wing ears and big bushy tail, Blastoise still looked like something that could be derived from the first two forms. Blaziken, Samurott, and Greninja are the only ones that made me raise an eyebrow

Squirtle to Wartortle is, but Blastoise looks significantly different from his prevos, far more than Greninja does to Froakie or Frogadier.
 

CazTGG

Member
If stuff like Jynx/Magmar/Mr.Mime came out today then people would lose their shit lol

About that...
latest


On the current topic: The entire Squirtle line is one bizarre evolution after another. You go from surfing ears and tail to cannons on your back? I like the line (save for Wartortle) but it's not exactly a logical leap of an evolution.
 

e105zeta

Neo Member
Pokemon's gone through three major art-shifts. While all generations have a mixture of designs, these are the overall feeling I get from each generation.

G1/2: Most Pokemon are simple blobs (Jigglypuff, Gengar, Togepi, Ditto), draconic or dinosaurs (Rhydon, Lapras, Dragonite, Charizard, Ampharos), kaiju (Nidoking, Nidoking, Tyrannitar) or a mixture of all of the above. There are Pokemon inspired by animals but only vaguely (wtf is even a Pigeot or Fearow?)

G 3/4: Most Pokemon are intricately based on real-life lifeforms with all of their details in anatomy (Anorith, Yanmega, Corphish, Ninjask, Swellow, Floatzel)

G 5/6: Most Pokemon are like Lucario - mostly humanoid and with a few animalistic traits thrown in. (Emboar, the elemental monkeys, Zoroark, Kami Trio, Gothitelle, all of the Kalos starters, Hawlucha et al)
 
Ya know, if the starters really do look like this it would just be my fucking luck.

They fuck up the final form of the Fox starter (my fav up til the final evo) that shoulda clearly been a fancy magical girl based on it's mid evo. After some years they internally admit that they bitched out on that one and give the that pretty female treatment to ... the goofy looking ass Water Seal thing and fucked over my love-a-first-sight fire kitty by making it a two legged dude bro.
 

JoeM86

Member
The Digimon argument would work on some level if the damn Pokémon in that rumoured concept art actually looked like Digimon.

I've heard the Digimon argument every time a new Pokémon has been revealed since bloody 1999.

I'm sick of it

Thing is, with many Pokémon this gen, I've seen people complaining that they look too basic and too much like animals
 

Boss Doggie

all my loli wolf companions are so moe
you'll only hear about the Digimon thing from the West

Japanese never really made or compare the two unless it was an intentional crossover fan material they're doing

also stop giving attention to Vire, look up that person's post history

About that...
latest


On the current topic: The entire Squirtle line is one bizarre evolution after another. You go from surfing ears and tail to cannons on your back? I like the line (save for Wartortle) but it's not exactly a logical leap of an evolution.

From what I hear they're supposed to represent "waves". Yeah it's weird. The tail and ears are supposed to resemble the tidal waves of the sea.
 
Ya know, if the starters really do look like this it would just be my fucking luck.

They fuck up the final form of the Fox starter (my fav up til the final evo) that shoulda clearly been a fancy magical girl based on it's mid evo.


:3

The rumour does mention Kalos starter megas so I wonder if they'll attempt to 'fix' delphox with that. That said, my mega is usually reserved for the awesomeness that is Mawile :p
 

Clefargle

Member
lava drool lmao

I rather have 30 Emboar over that.

Right? I don't get why people care so much about how edgelordy their final forms look. Or why they NEED them to have a smooth gradation of features from the first to last. Sometimes a pokemons last Evo stage looks cooler when it seems like it "went too far" or experienced some mutation. Variety is where it's at. But it's all subjective anyhow
 

Atlas157

Member
I've heard the Digimon argument every time a new Pokémon has been revealed since bloody 1999.

I'm sick of it

Thing is, with many Pokémon this gen, I've seen people complaining that they look too basic and too much like animals

That's one of the many problems with the Pokemon fanbase, and I'm sick of it too.

New intricate Pokemon gets revealed? "i-its a digimon :mad:(( gen 1 is the best!!!"

New simple Pokemon gets revealed? "stupid gamefreak getting lazy xD"
 

Kouriozan

Member
Hey, stop talking trash about Digimon :mad:
Sure some of their design looks horrible but it's not exclusive to this IP.

Personally, I try to understand what the designer(s) wanted to draw and thus I don't really hate any of those monsters.
 

Vire

Member
Okay. And I'm just telling you that this isn't a Pokemon Go discussion thread nor is it your platform to bash current designs and put Gen I designs on a pedastal. Literally nothing you are talking about has anything to do with the discussion at hand. If you wanna go into the Pokemon Community thread or Pokemon ORAS thread to talk about it, be my guest, but I really don't think you'll get a warm welcome there either. If you want hit up a thread to talk about this, I suggest the Pokemon Go thread, but I can't say how shared your opinion will be there, I haven't been. See ya.

Who are you to tell me what this thread is or isn't? I'm reading the opening post, it has leaks of concept art of the designs of the latest Pokemon, and I'm commenting that I don't like how overdesigned they look in my opinion. How is that not on topic?

If you want an echo chamber, you should follow your own instructions and go back to the Pokemon Community thread as you said.
 

Vire

Member
Like, why do the Pokemon need professions and stuff like that? Wasn't being a fire breathing dragon cool enough? Now they have to be wrestlers?
 
Like, why do the Pokemon need professions and stuff like that? Wasn't being a fire breathing dragon cool enough? Now they have to be wrestlers?

Why'd they have to mimes or body builders? You get my point.

Edit: Im glad the GameFreak just continues to make the games they want to make. Fans are way too fickle and move goalposts way too often.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Like, why do the Pokemon need professions and stuff like that? Wasn't being a fire breathing dragon cool enough? Now they have to be wrestlers?
The Hitmon___ family would like to have a word with you, among others.
 
Like, why do the Pokemon need professions and stuff like that? Wasn't being a fire breathing dragon cool enough? Now they have to be wrestlers?
Well wait while I don't like these designs and the owl totally does remind me of a Digimon. Pokemon have always had "professions". Chansey for example

Edit:yup machoke,mr mime etc
 
Like, why do the Pokemon need professions and stuff like that? Wasn't being a fire breathing dragon cool enough? Now they have to be wrestlers?
This is a line of argument I haven't heard before, so kudos for that.

I'm not sure it's a valid one, though- the Machop line, Hitmonchan, Chansey and Mr. Mime show us that this is nothing new.
 

Vire

Member
The Hitmon___ family would like to have a word with you, among others.

Well wait while I don't like these designs and the owl totally does remind me of a Digimon. Pokemon have always had "professions". Chansey for example

Edit:yup machoke,mr mime etc

I guess you are right, but it just seems like more of them have an extra twist now instead of being an interesting design in their own right.

I guess it's really the mishmash of colors and ornateness of them that bother me. It's hard to place a finger on it. Maybe them being humanoid also has something to do with it reminding me of Digimon.
 
I guess you are right, but it just seems like more of them have an extra twist now instead of being an interesting design in their own right.

I guess it's really the mishmash of colors and ornateness of them that bother me. It's hard to place a finger on it. Maybe them being humanoid also has something to do with it reminding me of Digimon.
Nah I get you I won't pile on ya. People shit on gen V all day I think they're some of the best starters in the franchise so eh opinions.

I don't like these guys..well two of them because I'm tired of every fire starter having to stand up, and the water starter...well idk what I'm looking at there. The owl is pretty cool tho using a bow as his wings is pretty cool
 
I guess you are right, but it just seems like more of them have an extra twist now instead of being an interesting design in their own right.

I guess it's really the mishmash of colors and ornateness of them that bother me. It's hard to place a finger on it. Maybe them being humanoid also has something to do with it reminding me of Digimon.

Lol. Pokemon has had humanoid mons since gen I way before Digimon. I mean Jesus. Lets think about this logically. What reason would Gamefreak ever have to copy digimon? This line of thinking simply makes zero sense.

Pokemon is Kobe and Digimon is Raja Bell.
 

Daemul

Member
Like, why do the Pokemon need professions and stuff like that? Wasn't being a fire breathing dragon cool enough? Now they have to be wrestlers?

Pokemon have had professions since Gen 1 with Chansey, this isn't something new.

EDIT:Beaten
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
I guess you are right, but it just seems like more of them have an extra twist now instead of being an interesting design in their own right.

I guess it's really the mishmash of colors and ornateness of them that bother me. It's hard to place a finger on it. Maybe them being humanoid also has something to do with it reminding me of Digimon.
And to be fair, the modern designs aren't far off from, say, Arcanine. Plus we've had questionable designs before, as shown by the likes of Muk. It may be just your nostalgia talking.
 

Cryxok

Member
I guess you are right, but it just seems like more of them have an extra twist now instead of being an interesting design in their own right.

I guess it's really the mishmash of colors and ornateness of them that bother me. It's hard to place a finger on it. Maybe them being humanoid also has something to do with it reminding me of Digimon.

Humanoid like Mr. Mime, Jynx, Hitmonchan etc?
I could be wrong, but Gen1 could be the one with the highest number of humanoid Pokémon.
Personally, Gen1 designs are, for the most part, uninteresting for me nowadays. Sure, I still love Arcanine and Nidoking, but I much prefer newer designs. And I've been playing since de Gameboy days too!
 

Vire

Member
Nah I get you I won't pile on ya. People shit on gen V all day I think they're some of the best starters in the franchise so eh opinions.

I don't like these guys..well two of them because I'm tired of every fire starter having to stand up, and the water starter...well idk what I'm looking at there. The owl is pretty cool tho using a bow as his wings is pretty cool

I like Gen V starters too *shrug*.

Gen VI was where it went south for me. Froakie is the only one that I really like.
 
Nah I get you I won't pile on ya. People shit on gen V all day I think they're some of the best starters in the franchise so eh opinions.

I don't like these guys..well two of them because I'm tired of every fire starter having to stand up, and the water starter...well idk what I'm looking at there. The owl is pretty cool tho using a bow as his wings is pretty cool

I like the mermaid thing but I am really hoping that there is a more merman looking version. Then again, I guess female fans have been having to put up with stuff like this from day one (female pokemon lookijg decidely male) so I wont complain.
 
I guess you are right, but it just seems like more of them have an extra twist now instead of being an interesting design in their own right.

I guess it's really the mishmash of colors and ornateness of them that bother me. It's hard to place a finger on it. Maybe them being humanoid also has something to do with it reminding me of Digimon.
Are you sure you're not just being swayed by nostalgia? For a lot of people the original pokemon have a special meaning to them because it was their first exposure to the franchise and took place in the golden days of their youth, so perhaps that might be the real root of your displeasure?

I only ask this because so far most of your issues seem to be easily disproven by posting pictures of gen 1 pokemon, so it comes across as you looking for problems rather than inherently having said problems :/
 

L Thammy

Member
I don't mind people comparing Pokemon to Digimon as long as they have proper perspective. Before you make that comparison, think long and hard about the fact that there is a Digimon based on Jesus. Contemplate that it's a knight with swords on its arms, legs, and tail, and that it's accompanied with fireball Digimon who are named after the Three Musketeers. It evolves from a set of dinosaur-like Digimon with bladed armour, which are all named after Huckleberry Finn. And he's basically trained by Jotaro Kujo.

If you can still compare a Pokemon to Digimon while you have that in mind, more power to you.
 
Top Bottom