Mistle said:Has anybody thought that maybe it'll look something like this? Replace the keyboard with a screen:
Mistle said:Here's my mock up:
Screen is detachable. Don't take it too seriously, lol. I do believe it's much more ergonomic than the other mock ups though.
EDIT: Btw- I in no way wish for Skyward Sword to be moved to next-gen, haha
Amir0x said:This is my bet:
The screen would of course be able to change what is presented on it, and the controller itself would be somewhat wider than the Wiimote we have now. The screen would have d-pad or A buttons and 1+2 buttons etc depending on orientation, etc. And of course the screen would recognize what direction you're holding the wiimote.
gundamkyoukai said:They were first to talk about the controller , they also gave specs for the NGP and they were mostly right . Either way as gofreak said not every one see upgrades the same way.
Doc Holliday said:Another thing, we've never seen nintendo franchises with "next gen" tech. It's not like when wii launched, where you had Zelda basically on the same hardware that you played luigis mansion on.
They released Pilotwings and Nintendogs the other day.Doc Holliday said:Another thing, we've never seen nintendo franchises with "next gen" tech. It's not like when wii launched, where you had Zelda basically on the same hardware that you played luigis mansion on.
evilromero said:I'd be happy with something a bit more powerful than the 360. In my opinion the visual leap in graphics beyond that point is minimal at best.
BGBW said:They released Pilotwings and Nintendogs the other day.
BGBW said:They released Pilotwings and Nintendogs the other day.
Jason's Ultimatum said:Was Galaxy a launch? Even if a few months later, the game still looks better than a lot of current generation games.
Jason's Ultimatum said:Was Galaxy a launch? Even if a few months later, the game still looks better than a lot of current generation games.
TheExecutive said:What do you mean?
This is what a HD 4870 can put out if properly coded for(this is a real time demo created by AMD specifically to show what developing for one GPU console style can pull off):evilromero said:I'd be happy with something a bit more powerful than the 360. In my opinion the visual leap in graphics beyond that point is minimal at best.
TheExecutive said:Art direction can do wonders for terrible technology.
_Alkaline_ said:Galaxy was nearly a year after the Wii came out.
Art direction can do wonders for terrible technology.
He said next-gen tech actually. Currently 3DS is the only thing that can be considered so.Futureman said:and? He's saying "next gen" CONSOLE tech, not handheld.
Rekubot said:Everybody is so quick to forget what IGN said the 3DS was capable of. Graphics equal to the 360/PS3, they said. Why are we trusting their word again?
IGN said:Nintendo has not revealed any specs for the 3DS system, but expect it to well surpass the Nintendo DS in visual and processor capabilities. To provide stereoscopic 3D effects the system must have the ability to render each game field twice, one for each of the players eyes, a technique that will require significant horsepower to produce.
Several developers that have experienced 3DS in its current form have reported, off the record, that it has processing capabilities that far exceed the Nintendo Wii and bring the device with abilities that are close to HD consoles such as PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360.
Mr_Brit said:This is what a HD 4870 can put out if properly coded for(this is a real time demo created by AMD specifically to show what developing for one GPU console style can pull off):
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/tobe_city3.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
And other than odd man out IGN (prone to exaggerate), nobody is talking about it being more powerful though. Nintendo is more likely to be using something like the 4350. People would have to be crazy to be disappointed with 4870. It's a solid, sensible choice from a performance/price POV.
miksar said:We still don't know what "the big surprise" saved for E3 is. Something tells me that all those rumors contain only half of the truth (like saying DS has two screens... and one of them is touch-capable, or Wii has a pointer controller... and it can also detect motion in 3D). As it is now that big screen on the controller and streamable games don't make any sense, but when we see E3 presentation it should all come together.
Buckethead said:0.0%
evilromero said:I'd be happy with something a bit more powerful than the 360. In my opinion the visual leap in graphics beyond that point is minimal at best.
Glad to see you still careNeo Child said:The only reason I play on Nintendo systems is for their games like Mario and Donkey Kong. At this point I could really care less if Nintendo became a third party, beacause having a Mario/Pokemon game with online community like XBox Live, achievements etc would be fantastic.
This. Didn't CVC and 01.net flat out say they don't ANYTHING about the CPU and the RAM?ryan-ts said:We still don't if any of this stuff is true.
Opus Angelorum said:You're being naive to think the visuals on the Xbox Next / PS4 won't be significantly better, they will.
Celine said:http://static.3dsconnect.com/2010/12/Super-Street-Fighter-IV-3D-Edition-collection-of-screenshots-with-3ds.png[IMG]
[IMG]http://gamerinvestments.com/video-game-stocks/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/3ds-graphics-old-vs-new-20100930095602849-street-fighter.jpg[/MG][/QUOTE]
Unfortunately, most games require more than two characters and a static background. You could easily make the argument Pilotwings is the most impressive game graphically (among those rendering a whole world of polygons), And not only is it not really that impressive, the framerate is pretty sucky to boot. The 3D does seem to smooth framerate jitteriness out, but I swear that game is dropping to 20 fps a lot of the time.
KAL2006 said:Exactly in the first year for Wii HD, it could get
Skyrim
Battlefield 3
Crysis 2
Witcher 2
Deus Ex 3
Mass Effect 2 and 3
Bioshock Infinite
COD
Mortal Kombat
MvC3
SSFIV AE
Tekken Tag 2
Dark Souls
Shadows of the Damned
Batman Arkham City
Final Fantasy XIII-2
Tomb Raider
Rage
Dragons Dogma
Dead Rising 2
and etc
all superior versions with the best graphics and optional wiimote pointer controls
I guess I mean even if it was more powerful than the PS360 like originally claimed that it wouldn't be a considerable difference for me. Just as powerful or significantly more powerful today doesn't have the same effect as it did ten years ago.TheExecutive said:What do you mean?
Doorman said:What other answers can they come up with?
Only the robot is being rendered. The city is real footage.Mr_Brit said:This is what a HD 4870 can put out if properly coded for(this is a real time demo created by AMD specifically to show what developing for one GPU console style can pull off):
Now tell me that the visual leap beyond 360 is minimal at best.
Door2Dawn said:This. Didn't CVC and 01.net flat out say they don't ANYTHING about the CPU and the RAM?
EatChildren said:Yes.
In terms of hardware there are no concrete or rumoured specifications at all. It's all speculation and guesses.
The philosophy behind Microsoft and Sony's rebrandings says otherwise, however. I think it's more foolish expecting Microsoft to release another Xbox soon when they've said mulitple times that the Xbox 360 + Kinect is meant to be the new one. The philosophy on Microsoft's front seems to be pretty much rebrand your console and extend it's lifespan, and Sony has also said they're interested in extending the lifespan of the PS3. So in other words it's very doubtful that either successor system will come out anytime soon in the next few years, and we barely know anything to suggest what they're going to be like.Opus Angelorum said:You're being naive to think the visuals on the Xbox Next / PS4 won't be significantly better, they will.
EatChildren said:Yes.
In terms of hardware there are no concrete or rumoured specifications at all. It's all speculation and guesses.
In terms of horsepower, the only thing we know is that sources are stating it's a little bit more powerful than the Xbox 360, or in the case of IGN much more powerful than the PS3.
Angry Fork said:Nintendo fans have got to be the most forgiving fans ever. I like Nintendo (sometimes) but I'm amazed that people are willing to accept 360-level power or 'just a notch above' this current gen.
Even if they have a better online system, more games etc. all that, it's like people magically forget the Wii for some reason and are okay with Nintendo again. It's amazing. Everyone just welcomes then with open arms no matter what they do. It's like those stockholm girlfriends that get beaten and then when the boyfriend does 1 nice thing for them they love them again (and forget about/ignore all the beating).
For me personally the Wii's terrible'ness will linger and won't go out of my mind for a looooong time. So they really need to court me at E3 with some mind blowing stuff and not this 512mb ram 360-level bullshit. They need to show like 10 core games from various franchises and some new IPs also developed by Nintendo, like really go all out. And no Wii Sports new IP bullshit, that's cheating. It needs to be something that can rival Mario/Zelda status. I'm tired of the laziness and print money strategy bullshit, if they go for that again there's no way I'd support it.
AdventureRacing said:Except despite having such incredibly inferior hardware this gen they were still able to make by far the best games (IMO of course). Also my favourite looking games this gen have been on the wii as well. You call them lazy i call them the only reason i haven't stopped gaming altogether (besides blizzard).
Personally i wouldn't care if nintendos next console wasn't that much more powerful than the 360/PS3. Nintendo have shown what they are capable of with even the wiis hardware so i suspect they can do quite a bit with that level of power, im especially looking forward to zelda.
Also you need to remember that everything you have been reading is nothing but rumours. I think it will end up being a decent amount more powerful than the 360/PS3 and thats enough for me. Developers are struggling enough as it is.
Big One said:The philosophy behind Microsoft and Sony's rebrandings says otherwise, however. I think it's more foolish expecting Microsoft to release another Xbox soon when they've said mulitple times that the Xbox 360 + Kinect is meant to be the new one. The philosophy on Microsoft's front seems to be pretty much rebrand your console and extend it's lifespan, and Sony has also said they're interested in extending the lifespan of the PS3. So in other words it's very doubtful that either successor system will come out anytime soon in the next few years, and we barely know anything to suggest what they're going to be like.
That's not real footage.civilstrife said:Only the robot is being rendered. The city is real footage.
1-D_FTW said:Unfortunately, most games require more than two characters and a static background. You could easily make the argument Pilotwings is the most impressive game graphically (among those rendering a whole world of polygons), And not only is it not really that impressive, the framerate is pretty sucky to boot. The 3D does seem to smooth framerate jitteriness out, but I swear that game is dropping to 20 fps a lot of the time.
Dax01 said:Kind of confused on this part, but if Wii 2 is only slightly more powerful than the 360, wouldn't that be a problem? I mean, Nintendo announces it at E3, releases it in 2012, then Sony and Microsoft come out with even more powerful systems in 2013. Nintendo is still behind the graphics curve. Again.
Dax01 said:Kind of confused on this part, but if Wii 2 is only slightly more powerful than the 360, wouldn't that be a problem? I mean, Nintendo announces it at E3, releases it in 2012, then Sony and Microsoft come out with even more powerful systems in 2013. Nintendo is still behind the graphics curve. Again.
Dax01 said:Kind of confused on this part, but if Wii 2 is only slightly more powerful than the 360, wouldn't that be a problem? I mean, Nintendo announces it at E3, releases it in 2012, then Sony and Microsoft come out with even more powerful systems in 2013. Nintendo is still behind the graphics curve. Again.
The graphics are amazing. But it doesn't look real to me at all. The whole screenshot is real time I would say.civilstrife said:Only the robot is being rendered. The city is real footage.