viciouskillersquirrel
Member
Fixed. It's the Duke Nukem Forever of JRPGs at this point.Big One said:Just a thought on Final Fantasy btw
![]()
What if it ever released?
Fixed. It's the Duke Nukem Forever of JRPGs at this point.Big One said:Just a thought on Final Fantasy btw
![]()
What if it ever released?
DeathbyVolcano said:*sigh*
no no no.
PEOPLE: WE NEED TO GET THIS STRAIGHT, FOR GOD'S SAKE
01net has reiterated many MANY times that they have no clue when it comes to the system's power, they've just heard that it's architecture is vaguely similar to the 360s. That is ALL they know regarding specs.
We honestly don't know much of anything about its power other than it's capable of HD graphics and has similar architecture to the 360.
Ridleyscott said:FFVII sold 9.7 million.
The point of a business is to meet market demand, not to force your perceived creativity on consumers. So, sales reflect how well you are meeting market demand. There is no reason for a new console because the vast majority of the market isn't interested in that, they just want good games... graphics don't determine that.
If Nintendo can't support the Wii by providing games people want to play on that system, then how could they support an entirely new console which is more expensive to develop for?
artwalknoon said:I hope its blu-ray and not dvds. Blu-ray would show Nintendo is serious about robust 3rd party games and future proofing at least the media format of their new system.
Big One said:Just a thought on Final Fantasy btw
![]()
What if?
There's already a system that could and should do it. :|beelzebozo said:KINGDOM HEARTS 3 would be sweet. with some jumping around this time, please.
I would hope they would be smart enough. I can cut them some slack on DVD because their excuse even if it was a lie at least had a basis in reality. DVD players are ultra common in houses.H_Prestige said:If it is bluray, I wonder if they will allow movie playback this time. With the 3ds one of their talking points was being able to watch movies on the thing.
DeathbyVolcano said:Pretty sure in the update they've posted today, they say they don't anything about the power, only the similar architecture. And there was someone earlier who said the actual translations being reported on aren't necessarily correct.
Question is, will it actually play Blu-Ray movies, or will they gimp the medium like they did with Wii DVD playback.Stylo said:Any console manufacturer that doesn't utilize Blu-Ray or similar tech next generation will have made a huge mistake.
I think it'll be the other way around dude - the N6 version will be the better of the three versions, thus making it definitive. Even if they don't take advantage of the hardware (multi-port rush job) the N6 version will be a smoother frame-rate experience, thus making it definitive either way.Andrex said:Also the thing about GTAV... if it hits when the Wii 2 launch and it is indeed coming out on other consoles, that means that it is probably being made for PS3 and 360 as well. And this sets the precedent that it's OK to port current gen games to Wii 2, which I don't know if I like.
DeathNote said:There's already a system that could and should do it. :|
Whichever one brings it, bring it.
I would place all my bets on Nintendo opting for a proprietary format. It could be Blu-Ray based but unless they're getting into the media center business it won't be standard Blu-Ray.Stylo said:Any console manufacturer that doesn't utilize Blu-Ray or similar tech next generation will have made a huge mistake.
That's true but I just can't see Nintendo opting for that much processor power. I wouldn't be shocked if the went all out on the GPU though. The R700 is nice but as a lot of people have pointed out ATI/AMD's newer GPU's are much more efficient at roughly the same cost.antonz said:Hard to say really Tri cores are really not that in fashion anymore. Hell Dual cores are becoming antiques. Quad is basically the standard now with the 6-8 cores really becoming more normal this year.
This is painful.brochiller said:I just took this translation from the site.
"He described the machine as a power roughly equivalent to the Xbox 360. So naturally it displays high definition, but should not make graphics revolution. As the Wii before it, it should rather find themselves at odds with the technological future successors to the PS3 and Xbox 360, by providing at its output, graphics generation from 2005-2007."
http://www.01net.com/editorial/531636/toutes-premieres-fuites-sur-le-successeur-de-la-wii/
brochiller said:I just took this translation from the site.
"He described the machine as a power roughly equivalent to the Xbox 360. So naturally it displays high definition, but should not make graphics revolution. As the Wii before it, it should rather find themselves at odds with the technological future successors to the PS3 and Xbox 360, by providing at its output, graphics generation from 2005-2007."
http://www.01net.com/editorial/531636/toutes-premieres-fuites-sur-le-successeur-de-la-wii/
This has been discussed already - they may be working off specs from a long time ago - Nintendo could have changed the specs a million times since then.brochiller said:I just took this translation from the site.
"He described the machine as a power roughly equivalent to the Xbox 360. So naturally it displays high definition, but should not make graphics revolution. As the Wii before it, it should rather find themselves at odds with the technological future successors to the PS3 and Xbox 360, by providing at its output, graphics generation from 2005-2007."
http://www.01net.com/editorial/531636/toutes-premieres-fuites-sur-le-successeur-de-la-wii/
Maybe because they saw the writing on wall regarding the wii and put their efforts into the wii2?
Very true. Tri cores were almost like a bad experiment before Quad core could be perfected. AMD for awhile had a ton of Tri Cores that were nothing but reject Quad cores.Saint Gregory said:I would place all my bets on Nintendo opting for a proprietary format. It could be Blu-Ray based but unless they're getting into the media center business it won't be standard Blu-Ray.
That's true but I just can't see Nintendo opting for that much processor power. I wouldn't be shocked if the went all out on the GPU though. The R700 is nice but as a lot of people have pointed out ATI/AMD's newer GPU's are much more efficient at roughly the same cost.
Ridleyscott said:What writing? they stopped making games for it. They are killing the Wii on their own... the market isn't doing it.
With the Wii Nintendo went back to the basics and owned this generation, now they are abandoning that sound business model (possibly, we can't be sure what is happening yet). They are now possibly going down the road that lead them to N64 and GC.
Nintendo needs more Zeldas, Marios, Tetrises, WiiSports, etc., etc. and Wii is the best platform for that. A new system does not guarantee content. They are just being lazy and refusing to game innovate. They need to create more gaming phenomenons on the software side rather than gimmicks to trick people into buying hardware.
antonz said:Very true. Tri cores were almost like a bad experiment before Quad core could be perfected. AMD for awhile had a ton of Tri Cores that were nothing but reject Quad cores.
Its going to be interesting no matter what for sure.
thefro said:It'll be interesting to see what Nintendo does internally on the RPG front assuming they get at least the multiplatform JRPGs from Square/Enix. Do they have Monolith crank out 3DS rpgs? Do they fund another Mistwalker game?
refusing to game innovate
thats what they're doing, guys
antonz said:Avatars are now only allowed hosted on gaf server. Go to the control panel and upload it for use
wtf is this shit!Ridleyscott said:NSMB Wii was an awesome game but a half-ditch effort. they didn't want to make that game but did because of sales. It was same-old Mario stuff recycled, not new 2D ideas and content.
Ridleyscott said:Yes, because it is the easy way out. Making games that sell 20 million and move consoles is not easy, forget money... making a great game that spread like wild-fire is difficult - it takes talent.
Maxrpg said:This has been discussed already - they may be working off specs from a long time ago - Nintendo could have changed the specs a million times since then.
people shouldn't play with corpsesAceBandage said:We also have Camelot that will probably make a new Golden Sun.
Boney said:dear god, i beg you, don't let this happen
I love your films man, keep up the good work!Ridleyscott said:Yes, because it is the easy way out. Making games that sell 20 million and move consoles is not easy, forget money... making a great game that spread like wild-fire is difficult - it takes talent.
But as the market is turning away from the Wii, developers have for a long time been looking elsewhere, some of the flaws of the system's design have become a major stumbling block (online multi-player, estore, graphics capabilities, and general lack of future-proofing)
The reason I would think that they'd go lowball on the CPU is that getting a super processor adds a lot of costs to a console that Nintendo seems to like to avoid - bigger power supplies, bigger cases, bigger cooling solutions - that all goes against their usual hardware philosophy. If they do want to position the new system as a media center then just throw all of that out of the windowantonz said:Very true. Tri cores were almost like a bad experiment before Quad core could be perfected. AMD for awhile had a ton of Tri Cores that were nothing but reject Quad cores.
Its going to be interesting no matter what for sure.
Ridleyscott said:The point of a business is to meet market demand, not to force your perceived creativity on consumers. So, sales reflect how well you are meeting market demand. There is no reason for a new console because the vast majority of the market isn't interested in that, they just want good games... graphics don't determine that.
Ridleyscott said:Nintendo can support the Wii, they just don't want to. They want to make puzzle-quest Zelda and Mario Star Finder. 3D Mario sold millions but not 22 million like both NSMB.
Maxrpg said:This has been discussed already - they may be working off specs from a long time ago - Nintendo could have changed the specs a million times since then.
NSMB Wii was an awesome game but a half-ditch effort. they didn't want to make that game but did because of sales. It was same-old Mario stuff recycled, not new 2D ideas and content.
wtf is this shit!
Ridleyscott said:Tell me this... How many people around the world would recognize the NES SMB theme song compared to how many would recognize any NSMB Wii song?
That tells you how much effort has been put into the NSMB. The goal is to create social gaming phenomenons. Had they put as much effort into NSMB Wii as they did Galaxy, it would be selling twice as much.
It's quite possible that WiiSports was the most perfectly-formed idea this generation. Moved tons of hardware and spawned many imitators. Even Nintendo's new Wii-line installments won't have nearly the same impact as Sports did.Ridleyscott said:Yes, because it is the easy way out. Making games that sell 20 million and move consoles is not easy, forget money... making a great game that spread like wild-fire is difficult - it takes talent.
lol kRidleyscott said:Tell me this... How many people around the world would recognize the NES SMB theme song compared to how many would recognize any NSMB Wii song?
That tells you how much effort has been put into the NSMB. The goal is to create social gaming phenomenons. Had they put as much effort into NSMB Wii as they did Galaxy, it would be selling twice as much.
Sean Malstrom=Ridleyscott confirmed?
Because he's an awesome film-maker.AceBandage said:Why are you guys seriously responding to Ridley?
AceBandage said:Why are you guys seriously responding to Ridley?
What???Ridleyscott said:Tell me this... How many people around the world would recognize the NES SMB theme song compared to how many would recognize any NSMB Wii song?
That tells you how much effort has been put into the NSMB. The goal is to create social gaming phenomenons. Had they put as much effort into NSMB Wii as they did Galaxy, it would be selling twice as much.