Vinci said:
I'm not talking about what's feasible. In this particular situation, Nintendo is trying to appeal to 3rd parties - they're wanting to appease them. A nod to them isn't enough. They need to do exactly what 3rd parties want, and 3rd parties by and large have had no interest whatsoever in anything resembling the Wii Remote.
Seriously, if they do what you're suggesting, 3rd parties will have yet another excuse for not fucking with the thing.
The main sticking point for 3rd parties was the power differential, not the controller.
Adapting controls is a walk in the park compared to trying to squash an HD game into an SD console. Familiarity when something is as successful as the Wii is important, for a lot of people it was their introduction to gaming or their re-introduction back to it. You evolve the controller, not radically change it. Same with the move from the NES to the SNES, which also was the introduction of a lot of people to gaming.
3rd parties will automatically want to be onboard a third revenue stream, it just has to be made cost effective to do so. And not create the catch 22 situation the Wii did where it was too much bother to port, leading to missing franchises or spin-off games which then cemented the Wii as a platform not for those games.