This is what I’ve been seeing. Russia is sustaining some losses, but they’re clearly making progress. Whether they are disappointed with the progress or not is really up for debate. I’m assuming they are surprised by the coordinated response from the West, but who can say? Regardless, in purely military terms, this remains a war that Russia is going to win sooner or later.Analysis from a conflict expert who predicted the Afghan disaster.
Putin is NOT crazy, the Russian invasion is NOT failing: BILL ROGGIO
ROGGIO: Believing Russia's assault is going poorly may make us feel better but is at odds with the facts. We cannot help Ukraine if we cannot be honest about its predicament.www.dailymail.co.uk
This is what I’ve been seeing. Russia is sustaining some losses, but they’re clearly making progress. Whether they are disappointed with the progress or not is really up for debate. I’m assuming they are surprised by the coordinated response from the West, but who can say? Regardless, in purely military terms, this remains a war that Russia is going to win sooner or later.
Now what comes next remains to be seen. I have no idea how Russia will hold the territory it occupies outside of the provinces in the East that were already very sympathetic. I doubt shelling the shit out of major cities is going ingratiate them to Ukrainians. So it could turn into some kind of occupation vs guerrilla resistance kind of war. We will see if Russia learned anything from the US in Afghanistan and Iraq at that point.
But the broader point is that we are going to see Kiev fall in the next few days, maybe weeks. It might be comforting to imagine the truly heroic resistance driving the Russians back, but I don’t see that happening. The most they can do it make the Russians bleed for each bit of ground they take. The sanctions are more about punishment and crippling Russia over a more broad time scale than this war will operate on. It’s going to damage their markets in the near term, but most of that won’t have a tangible impact on the war until it’s too late.
Yeah unfortunately it seems like this is the consensus. But it is not over until it is over! If Ukraine can stretch this into months instead of weeks, maybe enough unrest in Russia will stop things.This is what I’ve been seeing. Russia is sustaining some losses, but they’re clearly making progress. Whether they are disappointed with the progress or not is really up for debate. I’m assuming they are surprised by the coordinated response from the West, but who can say? Regardless, in purely military terms, this remains a war that Russia is going to win sooner or later.
Now what comes next remains to be seen. I have no idea how Russia will hold the territory it occupies outside of the provinces in the East that were already very sympathetic. I doubt shelling the shit out of major cities is going ingratiate them to Ukrainians. So it could turn into some kind of occupation vs guerrilla resistance kind of war. We will see if Russia learned anything from the US in Afghanistan and Iraq at that point.
But the broader point is that we are going to see Kiev fall in the next few days, maybe weeks. It might be comforting to imagine the truly heroic resistance driving the Russians back, but I don’t see that happening. The most they can do it make the Russians bleed for each bit of ground they take. The sanctions are more about punishment and crippling Russia over a more broad time scale than this war will operate on. It’s going to damage their markets in the near term, but most of that won’t have a tangible impact on the war until it’s too late.
I have a feeling Russia is going to cut Ukraine in half and then negotiate giving some of it back in return for keeping Crimea and the eastern provinces plus a bit of a buffer zone. I don’t believe they will want or be able to occupy much of Western Ukraine for very long. I could be wrong though.Yeah unfortunately it seems like this is the consensus. But it is not over until it is over! If Ukraine can stretch this into months instead of weeks, maybe enough unrest in Russia will stop things.
Edit: Imagine an insurgency where the insurgents are armed with stingers and javelins, rather than makeshift suicide bombs. That is a nightmare.
What are you thinking they should have learned?We will see if Russia learned anything from the US in Afghanistan and Iraq at that point.
NemiroffWhat’s a good Ukrainian vodka? I had one from Moldova once and it was terrible.
If anyone wanted to know why Russia moves their convoys in bunched up straight lines:
The tires on their vehicles haven’t been maintained well over the the past year and that plus the mud is a disaster for them.
there's a rumor that some of the big boys in Russia put a 1 million bounty on Putin head
Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizzaWhat are you thinking they should have learned?
The invasion seems to have been planned long before that. A February invasion was mentioned in some podcast earlier in the thread. It might not have been certain at that point, plausible deniability, but enough to inform those that supported it and keep them in the loop to any changes or confirmations.I saw a analyst somewhere before the invasion that this one of the main reasons that they were predicting the attack for late February and not until their logistical problem were solved. In march the snow melts and terrain becomes almost impractical outside the roads.
YACHTZEE!
That occupying foreign countries that don’t want you there is an enormous waste of time that comes at tremendous cost.What are you thinking they should have learned?
You? Probably not.Can you just start seizing private property because you don’t like how their country of origin is behaving?
Please continue and elaborate how you think that would that be solved?That occupying foreign countries that don’t want you there is an enormous waste of time that comes at tremendous cost.
The invasion seems to have been planned long before that. A February invasion was mentioned in some podcast earlier in the thread. It might not have been certain at that point, plausible deniability, but enough to inform those that supported it and keep them in the loop to any changes or confirmations.
Rasputista.
A section is against a country not a citizen or their assets. The government has forced private citizens to sell or break up assets in monopoly laws. But to say a private citizen cannot have something anymore due to sanctions against their home country is a bad idea. You could possibly deny its movement or use of assets but you shouldn't just take it.You? Probably not.
Don't like? No. It's part of sanctions.
If you want to take it up with Bundeswehr. Feel free.
Please continue and elaborate how would that be solved?
They’re targeting Putin’s cronies, these aren’t random private citizens like a Bezos or Musk. Their yachts are ill-gotten from stealing from dirt poor Russian citizens. These guys are the Russian state.A section is against a country not a citizen or their assets. The government has forced private citizens to sell or break up assets in monopoly laws. But to say a private citizen cannot have something anymore due to sanctions against their home country is a bad idea. You could possibly deny its movement or use of assets but you shouldn't just take it.
that is all I will say. No debating Russia is disgusting for attacking Ukraine.
And those big boys will try to get rid of Putin so they can make money againThey’re targeting Putin’s cronies, these aren’t random private citizens like a Bezos or Musk. Their yachts are ill-gotten from stealing from dirt poor Russian citizens. These guys are the Russian state.
These oligarchs are people directly connected to the decisions and actions of the Russian Government. These are not ordinary civilians and Russia does not have a western style of government or rule of law. The money and assets are all part of how the Russian government conducts business.A section is against a country not a citizen or their assets. The government has forced private citizens to sell or break up assets in monopoly laws. But to say a private citizen cannot have something anymore due to sanctions against their home country is a bad idea. You could possibly deny its movement or use of assets but you shouldn't just take it.
that is all I will say. No debating Russia is disgusting for attacking Ukraine.
I mean, if I’m Russia, I take Kiev and split Ukraine in half from Kiev to Crimea. I make it clear that I can continue to devastate every city the opposes me demand that Crimea and the eastern provinces be formally recognized as Russia or I will continue until functionally there is no more Ukraine to negotiate with. Then I hope they don’t call my bluff because I don’t want to occupy most of the country.You? Probably, not.
Don't like? No. It's part of sanctions.
If you want to take it up with Bundesweir. Feel free.
Please continue and elaborate how would that be solved?
Can you just start seizing private property because you don’t like how their country of origin is behaving?
this sets a bad precedence for the future. Maybe the US should just start seizing Chinese owned land in America.
That doesn't seem that different from the Afghan/Iraq strategy. What's the applicable lesson?I mean, if I’m Russia, I take Kiev and split Ukraine in half from Kiev to Crimea. I make it clear that I can continue to devastate every city the opposes me demand that Crimea and the eastern provinces be formally recognized as Russia or I will continue until functionally there is no more Ukraine to negotiate with. Then I hope they don’t call my bluff because I don’t want to occupy most of the country.
A bomb.Jesus, that 2nd blast turned night into day for a second.
WTF was that
I would say it’s significantly different than Iraq and particularly Afghanistan. The US occupied Afghanistan for 20 years. Tried to build a country there. But the population never bought in, which became obvious because as soon as we said we were leaving, they abandoned the “country” we spent all that time trying to establish. The US had to fight wave after wave of insurgencies to little effect.That doesn't seem that different from the Afghan/Iraq strategy. What's the applicable lesson?
The situations are different, no question.I would say it’s significantly different than Iraq and particularly Afghanistan. The US occupied Afghanistan for 20 years. Tried to build a country there. But the population never bought in, which became obvious because as soon as we said we were leaving, they abandoned the “country” we spent all that time trying to establish. The US had to fight wave after wave of insurgencies to little effect.
The situation between Russia and Ukraine is different. The geography and cultural issues are significantly different. Russia and Ukraine are neighbors. There are portions of Ukraine in the east that, based on things I’ve read, sort of identify with Russian culturally as much as they do Ukraine. So in theory, Russia could assimilate them without expending that much energy.
The clearly doesn’t apply to the majority of Ukraine, however. And if Russia tries to occupy much of Ukraine and turn it into Russia, they will run into the same problems the US did and probably worse.
Just to be clear, that isn’t some justification for what Russia is doing. It’s just a compare and contrast between the US in Iraq/Afghanistan and Russia/Ukraine.
Oh no. If that’s how it came across, that wasn’t my intention. I guess in theory that would be a “solution” from the sense that if you kill everyone, you don’t have to worry about an opposition. But I wasn’t even considering that as an option just because it would just be too horrific.The situations are different, no question.
My inquiry is to what lesson do you see Russia should take from the US experience in Afghan/Iraq.
To be clear myself, your words implied the solution you saw was genocide. Is that the case?
The best stuff comes in an unlabeled bottle from babushka.What’s a good Ukrainian vodka? I had one from Moldova once and it was terrible.
...in their own shitThe best stuff comes in an unlabeled bottle from babushka.
Hope they drown!
I would say it’s significantly different than Iraq and particularly Afghanistan. The US occupied Afghanistan for 20 years. Tried to build a country there. But the population never bought in, which became obvious because as soon as we said we were leaving, they abandoned the “country” we spent all that time trying to establish. The US had to fight wave after wave of insurgencies to little effect.
The situation between Russia and Ukraine is different. The geography and cultural issues are significantly different. Russia and Ukraine are neighbors. There are portions of Ukraine in the east that, based on things I’ve read, sort of identify with Russian culturally as much as they do Ukraine. So in theory, Russia could assimilate them without expending that much energy.
The clearly doesn’t apply to the majority of Ukraine, however. And if Russia tries to occupy much of Ukraine and turn it into Russia, they will run into the same problems the US did and probably worse.
Just to be clear, that isn’t some justification for what Russia is doing. It’s just a compare and contrast between the US in Iraq/Afghanistan and Russia/Ukraine.
Things are not going well for Comrade PUTA.. Err I mean Putin..
Diverting forces to contain protests in Russia will only strengthen Ukrainian resolve and spirit.
Now what comes next remains to be seen.
That seems to make some optimistic appraisals on incorrect assumption as to the nature of civilization and benefits of education. As well as the supply and technical support from first world nations is a bit different than what the Afghans got.Afghanistan was also a poor country with a language few Americans would have known. Ukraine is completely different. I imagine Ukrainians have largely been domesticated by civilization, and they can effectively be monitored by Russian intelligence with smartphones. I think it might very well by possible for the Russian government to stamp out most dissent and for the occupation to be a much shorter time period.
At no point in history have we had such a great ability to monitor the private activities of people. That's a lot less useful in a poor country like Afghanistan, especially when there is a language/cultural barrier between the people doing the monitoring and the people being monitored. I think with the technology level we have today, and a domesticated population, you can have a totalitarian state completely dominate the private lives of its people.
Also where is all this technology really going? I mean if we are going to automate more work we need to have new jobs somewhere. Have you ever considered listening to "privately recorded" phone calls as a career? You won't need a college education, just undying patriotism comrade.
You aren't wrong at all.I have a feeling Russia is going to cut Ukraine in half and then negotiate giving some of it back in return for keeping Crimea and the eastern provinces plus a bit of a buffer zone. I don’t believe they will want or be able to occupy much of Western Ukraine for very long. I could be wrong though.
You are incorrect. Individuals are sanctioned on a regular basis.A section is against a country not a citizen or their assets
That seems to make some optimistic appraisals and incorrect assumption on the nature of civilization and benefits of education. As well as the supply and technical support from first world nations is a bit different than what the Afghans got.
Your idea that civilization makes Ukrainian people domesticated is misanthropic at best.
From the numbers returning to Ukraine they are picking up guns and fighting.I think it's a completely uncontroversial point that civilization domesticates people. Dudes working office or service sector jobs for the most part are not going to be picking up guns and fighting no matter what happens. They won't be waging guerilla war, and in the face of actual oppressing would at best flee and at their worst would simply beg whoever was oppressing them to stop.
The kind of work we do, and the technology we have access to shapes us more than we shape it. You get too much of this stuff and you'll never get in a fight or do anything bold in your life. Except maybe you'll do something bold while you are trying to take a selfie.
I don't know what kind of education people get in Ukraine, but my college experience is that "education" is a combination of teaching you how to do certain tasks, and how to properly pretend to believe society's official narratives about itself.
From the numbers returning to Ukraine they are picking up guns and fighting.
Your appraisal doesn't seem to be based on facts but on an inner projection.
The reporting is probably more accurate than your imagination.The reporting on what is happening in Ukraine is so shoddy I doubt everything I read based on how many stories I've seen change over the course of a day. No one will know how much of this is true for some time.
Depends on the type of deployment, and what kind of civilian resistance will develop. I get your point though. I should have used different wording to make my point regarding its effects. It would be difficult to quantify its impact on the Russian effort from a logistical perspective.Domestics forces have their own units. it's how they control the biggest country on the planet. and military units assigned for government officials are even further separated. almost every country has separation between military arenizations that 1/fight foreign forces . 2/domestic crime .3/domestic militancy against the state. 4/protect from internal regime coups.