"State media" has a specific meaning, which is that the media outlet is owned and controlled by the government.Have you never seen journalists speak with American soldiers? Are they US state media embedded? Journalists go to war zones all the time, it's their job.
Also saw this:
Just a handful of jets. Does Ukraine even have pilots ?
Big difference is Xi Jin Ping being a wildcard and the alliance with Russia now though. Jiang Zemin was a relatively benign Chairman who peacefully transferred power when his term was up unlike Winnie the Pooh. IDK probably nothing would happen but you never know how it will get spun…fun fact China does allow protests as long as it’s against a foreign target.Not likely. Didn’t the US/NATO bomb a Chinese embassy in the 90s on accident? Whoopsie. Nothing happened
I could see China using some sort of incident as a fake pretext for something they were already going to do, but I don't think they want to self immolate their economy the way Putin foolishly did, so I just doubt they have much desire to give a shit about journalists.Big difference is Xi Jin Ping being a wildcard and the alliance with Russia now though. Jiang Zemin was a relatively benign Chairman who peacefully transferred power when his term was up unlike Winnie the Pooh. IDK probably nothing would happen but you never know how it will get spun…fun fact China does allow protests as long as it’s against a foreign target.
..are they planning to make the russian people healthier?Iconic U.S. brands Coca-Cola, Pepsi, McDonald's and Starbucks suspend business in Russia
In recent days, all four companies have drawn criticism for continuing to operate in Russia while other U.S. companies backed out and paused sales.www.cnbc.com
Coca-Cola and Starbucks were giving them periodic breaks from the vodka...are they planning to make the russian people healthier?
It's probably been noted before in this thread but especially when looking at all these companies suspending their business in Russia, I've been thinking that in a way we've deployed the 21st centuries most controversial weapon, namely cancel culture, in a way that seems remarkably uncontroversial.Iconic U.S. brands Coca-Cola, Pepsi, McDonald's and Starbucks suspend business in Russia
In recent days, all four companies have drawn criticism for continuing to operate in Russia while other U.S. companies backed out and paused sales.www.cnbc.com
Does coke have local manufacturing in Russia? So now they could nationalize it.It's probably been noted before in this thread but especially when looking at all these companies suspending their business in Russia, I've been thinking that in a way we've deployed the 21st centuries most controversial weapon, namely cancel culture, in a way that seems remarkably uncontroversial.
Pshah!Coca-Cola and Starbucks were giving them periodic breaks from the vodka.
Suka Cola...?Does coke have local manufacturing in Russia? So now they could nationalize it.
PepsiCo Inc, the multinational food, snack, and beverage corporation, has just announced that they will also be suspending all sales in Russia, joining a number of Western companies who have announced similar decisions today.
They were never going to join anyway. It's a country of 84mln people, the money required to lift them up would be insane. In the last 20 years Poland was the largest country at 39mln, then Romania at 20mln. That is not even mentioning impossible reforms and willingness of Turks to give back part of their decision-making to Brussels.And I say: FK Turkey. I guess they will never join UE now.
Now your only choices are Tito’s and Suntory everything else with a vaguely Russian sounding name is cancelledPshah!
As if you never heard of the Stolichino and vod & coke. Wait... maybe that's a different coke?
Russian central bank restricts withdrawals
The bank has announced that citizens with foreign currency accounts will not be allowed to withdraw more than $10,000 (£7,632) until 9 September.
Regardless of which foreign currency clients have in their accounts, withdrawals will be paid in US dollars, it added.
The biolabs in Ukraine bit has been upgraded to biological research facilities.
It's probably been noted before in this thread but especially when looking at all these companies suspending their business in Russia, I've been thinking that in a way we've deployed the 21st centuries most controversial weapon, namely cancel culture, in a way that seems remarkably uncontroversial.
The biolabs in Ukraine bit has been upgraded to biological research facilities.
Edit: The person speaking in this clip is Victoria Nuland.
Victoria Nuland - United States Department of State
Ambassador Victoria Nuland was sworn-in as Under Secretary for Political Affairs in April 2021. Prior to that, she was Senior Counselor at the Albright Stonebridge Group, a global strategic advisory and commercial diplomacy firm based in Washington, DC. She was also a non-resident Senior Fellow...www.state.gov
The biolabs in Ukraine bit has been upgraded to biological research facilities.
Edit: The person speaking in this clip is Victoria Nuland.
Victoria Nuland - United States Department of State
Ambassador Victoria Nuland was sworn-in as Under Secretary for Political Affairs in April 2021. Prior to that, she was Senior Counselor at the Albright Stonebridge Group, a global strategic advisory and commercial diplomacy firm based in Washington, DC. She was also a non-resident Senior Fellow...www.state.gov
Stop spreading Chinese and Russian disinformation. Nuland is talking about infectious disease facilities. There are no US bio-weapon labs in Ukraine. Fuck’s sake. This is from RT for crying out loud
Well this is a level of cancellation SJW's could hitherto only dream about. But it has got me thinking that all those arguments about it were never really about the validity of the method (since apparently under certain circumstances almost everyone thinks it's a valid tool) but rather just the specific reasons.If the emergence of cancel culture in the last few years has led to this domino tumbling of companies cutting off Russia, then it’s all been entirely worth it. Let’s hope it continues. Everything out of Russia. Everything.
A video that has our Ambassador stating that there are facilities present that are of concern enough to warrant "keeping out of Russian hands". The wording itself of "biological research facilities" along with your "infectious disease facilities" is a red flag as those are type of faciliities not ones we want to fuck with or have close as all it takes is one screw up to make the last two years look like a happy picnic.
Grain of salt and all that but encouraging if this is reliable.
The only way this is valid is if the goal of the propaganda is to make the war larger.Your desire to entertain conspiracy theories about top secret genetically engineered bio-weapons is helping Vladimir Putin, and hurting the effort against him.
Please post the evidence of what these facilities really are. That'd shut the conspiracies up.No. You’re making shit up. You have zero evidence of this. Infectious disease facilities are a thing all over the world, because we have infectious diseases. It isn’t some lab developing the fucking T-Virus
And all you’re doing is posting bullshit that’s been designed to justify Putin’s actions. Your desire to entertain conspiracy theories about top secret genetically engineered bio-weapons is helping Vladimir Putin, and hurting the effort against him.
The only way this is valid is if the goal of the propaganda is to make the war larger.
Ukraine’s Air Force still operating shows how much of a joke Russia is really.
The biolabs in Ukraine bit has been upgraded to biological research facilities.
Edit: The person speaking in this clip is Victoria Nuland.
Victoria Nuland - United States Department of State
Ambassador Victoria Nuland was sworn-in as Under Secretary for Political Affairs in April 2021. Prior to that, she was Senior Counselor at the Albright Stonebridge Group, a global strategic advisory and commercial diplomacy firm based in Washington, DC. She was also a non-resident Senior Fellow...www.state.gov
Please post the evidence of what these facilities really are. That'd shut the conspiracies up.
What the ambassador called them specifically is pretty relevant point. Blatant hand waving and dismissal however, is not.Sigh. Much point? I can point to articles and reports from respectable media outlets, but they’ll just be dismissed as the evil mainstream media warping stuff to suit the agenda. Whereas randoms on Twitter, RT, Sputnik and other Russian propaganda outfits are perfectly believable, because they’re not scared to tell the truth!
Yes, but the guy you responded to is just some guy on the internet. What anyone believes in here is ultimately irrelevant.No. The goal of the propaganda is to rationalise and justify the cations of Putin. Claiming there are dangerous US bio weapon facilities in Ukraine is a way to do this.
Wtf are you talking about. He isn't making up shit.No. You’re making shit up. You have zero evidence of this. Infectious disease facilities are a thing all over the world, because we have infectious diseases. It isn’t some lab developing the fucking T-Virus
And all you’re doing is posting bullshit that’s been designed to justify Putin’s actions. Your desire to entertain conspiracy theories about top secret genetically engineered bio-weapons is helping Vladimir Putin, and hurting the effort against him.
That sucks. I can't imagine there's a lot of people who know that job, much less willing to go into a warzone to do it.Local inspection crews are warning of a catastrophic event at the Tjernobyl casket. Crews havent been allowed to rest since the invasion. Local warning systems have been turned off by the Russian armed forces.
Liverapportering: Ryska invasionen av Ukraina
Liverapportering med de senaste nyheterna om kriget mellan Ryssland och Ukraina. Om senaste utvecklingen och bakgrunden. Varför invaderar Ryssland Ukraina?www.aftonbladet.se
Man, is it going to be the same plant twice in my life time??
Or do you want to tell us the video is a deep fake and what you can hear in the video was never said?
What the fuck is going on here. USA gives us "green light" to hand over those jets to Ukraine but with a disclaimer that it's only our independent decision. Then after we make an offer that NATO hands them over instead of us they refuse saying it's too risky.
Also, a battlefield where the Russian soldiers have already proven to be incredibly careless would be even riskier to put in control of even an "infectious disease facility."
Looking at how things have developed in Europe the last 30 years, I would think that most of the Green parties really need to be looked at.
In most nations they were all for downsizing the military (because Russia isn't aggressive anymore), stopping nuclear evolution, and suggesting that LNG from Russia is something that isn't so bad (because Russia are friendly to the west now), until you develop renewable energy. Meanwhile, we can also see huge investors paying money to the green parties, from Russia.
(Thorium reactors, with a gen 5 sub plant, is there really anything more green and safe than that?)