Putin, Crimea river
In general, I really like Robert Wright's take that we should look to give Putin an off-ramp that allows him to save face. I get it might feel good to humiliate him but humiliated people are people at their most dangerous.
Perfect response
I thought you set me me up hahaPerfect response
Unlikely anyone is going to agree to go along with Vova's larping. Did Wright suggest a suitable off-ramp?In general, I really like Robert Wright's take that we should look to give Putin an off-ramp that allows him to save face. I get it might feel good to humiliate him but humiliated people are people at their most dangerous.
Russian troops intentionally avoiding Kyiv. He’s going to nuke them.
Very good point.I have to wonder how the soldiers will react once they realize that they are basically not being paid and that their paycheck is worth less than the uniform they are wearing.
It’s going to be a war of attrition. Putin will attempt to cut Kyiv off from all supplies. Putin hopes the lack of food and clean water will make civilians flee and weaken the UA.This is what i mean. I found it quite worrying how everday Russian troops seem to be 10-15miles outside of Kyiv, and not getting any closer.
They are trying to come from all directions. I don’t think this means that he will nuke Kyiv. A lot of pressure is going on the South and Southeast. What is holding the line is Kharkiv. If the city falls then it will be quite bad for the resistance.This is what i mean. I found it quite worrying how everday Russian troops seem to be 10-15miles outside of Kyiv, and not getting any closer.
Putin has been holding back but now he’s embarrassed and trying to regain some face by making the world remember he’s wearing big boy pants and has big boy toys that he could use if he really wanted to.Russia could have airstriked Kyiv into oblivion from the beginning, but chose not to. They want to capture it, not obliterate it. They want to bring Ukraine back into the fold, and that would be pretty hard if they leveled the capital.
It makes even less sense to nuke it as the consequences would be dire for them.
Well, if he’s actually insane, I’d say a whole lot.Putin has been holding back but now he’s embarrassed and trying to regain some face by making the world realize he has big toys that he could use if he really wanted to.
He’s extorting the west with fear that he might use nukes if we help out in a substantial way. I say call his fucking bluff he’d be insane to use them so what do we have to lose?
Im no expert but I think an atom bomb is wildly different from an overheating/ malfunctioning reactor. Everyone would know.The pessimist in me wonders if they took Chernobyl to use a nuke while making it look like an accident. Like how would we know if they went in and detonated one of their doomsday devices they were working on in the 80’s and blamed it on a errant ukranian missile or intense fighting or something?
Ukraine invasion began exactly like that: NATO and Ukraine didn't buy Putin's threats of invasion and called his bluff. Putin wasn't willing to lose face so he acted on his word and we're here today.He’s extorting the west with fear that he might use nukes if we help out in a substantial way. I say call his fucking bluff he’d be insane to use them so what do we have to lose?
What lesson does he take away from all this once he realizes NATO will back down when all he has to do is merely threaten nuking a city? That’s no way to live. If we allow him to dictate the rules WHATS to stop him from threatening to nuke Belgium next week in order to get back into swift or to return Russian vodka back to store shelves.Ukraine invasion began exactly like that: NATO and Ukraine didn't buy Putin's threats of invasion and called his bluff. Putin wasn't willing to lose face so he acted on his word and we're here today.
"What do we have to lose", you ask? well, for starters, a chunk of planet earth (even if it's the size of one city), several hundreds of thousands of people and a shift in global powers not seen since 1945, which has inevitable catastrophic economic consequences for every single nation on earth.
I think NATO and Ukraine got the message very clearly that Putin is indeed kind of mad and is not bluffing.
not much i guess, just life as we know it lulI say call his fucking bluff he’d be insane to use them so what do we have to lose?
He is only threatening the use of nukes because he believes he can get away with it and the west will give in to his demands. He’s acting like a child throwing a tantrum: he deserves a spanking for his unacceptable behavior not a lollipop from NATO as a reward.not much i guess, just life as we know it lul
Russian troops intentionally avoiding Kyiv. He’s going to nuke them.
He doesn’t know how. That’s the problem with tough guy personalities. All bravado, but no substance. He can threaten the world with nukes, but he can’t even reliably fuel and feed his troops going into a country adjacent to his own. Incompetent Russian logistics knows no bounds.I’ll never understand why in the XXIst century some asshole is still thinking in medieval terms when it comes to territory and power.
Russia is like the largest country in the world, his economy is the size of Spain and population is aggressively shrinking - maybe fix that if you give a shit about your country?
I saw someone from Russia saying that this is just like the Cuban missile crisis where the us didn’t want Russian missiles on their front door (Cuba) and now Russia doesn’t want Ukraine to join nato and have nato missiles on their front door. What would be a good response?
Important distinction: USSR was trying to put nuclear weapons in Cuba which at the time, was a significant factor in allowing for first strike capability given the technology limits of the era and the proximity to US soil.I saw someone from Russia saying that this is just like the Cuban missile crisis where the us didn’t want Russian missiles on their front door (Cuba) and now Russia doesn’t want Ukraine to join nato and have nato missiles on their front door. What would be a good response?
Gotcha, I’m assuming their nukes were leftover from when they were part of the USSR? (Ukraine)Important distinction: USSR was trying to put nuclear weapons in Cuba which at the time, was a significant factor in allowing for first strike capability given the technology limits of the era and the proximity to US soil.
Ukraine on the otherhand, gave up its nukes in the pursuit of NATO membership. If anything, the country was defanged.
The donated fighters are either already on their way or will be soon.
Buh bye Russian economy. A week or so ago it was at 75:1.
The portion about the Mayor is incorrect.. He came out and said so earlier.
Giant unlinked images with misinfo and speculation @realbullshitnonews
It's not about the nukes. it's the whole NATO military infrastructure and commitments. If NATO get's pulled to war with Russia because of Syria or Libya, Ukraine would be part of it and right on the border of the Russian heartland. Hawks already tried to activate the alliance when Turkey and Russia had a confrontation in Syria.Gotcha, I’m assuming their nukes were leftover from when they were part of the USSR? (Ukraine)
They are trying to come from all directions. I don’t think this means that the pisco will nuke Kyiv. South and Southeast is pretty much done. What is holding the line is Kharkiv. If the city falls then it will be quite bad for the resistance.
Edit: Odessa also needs to keep holding but it seems that the situation isn’t very good down there. If Russia connects to Transnistria then it will be even more pressure.
China is releasing their garbage alternative to SWIFT
These sanctions have got to count for something. Putin being in this war longer than he needs to is working out in the favour of the West.