Amiga
Member
I mean if it was a war with NATO there are fewer cities to nuke. make no mistake a direct confrontation without proxies means nukes, no foreplay.
Russia begins Invasion of Ukraine
- Thread starter AfricanKing
- Start date
- News NSFW
- Status
Craig of War
Banned
Bro there will be no nukes stop with the stupid nukes talks nobody wins with nuke as soon as Russia use nukes they will be wiped off the face of the earth same for Nato and US it will be the end of life on earth you people and your nukes idea are not thinking straight
speckz
Member
A few members of the Russian Parliament speak out against the war. (Published 2022)
In a rare show of dissent, three deputies of the State Duma have expressed regret about the attack.
TheDreadLord
Member
In many countries, only the existence of such groups would be enough for people being charged and even going to jail. Let's try not to find excuses for such things to exist.
Not sure I get this Canadian ban on Russian oil imports. Isn't Canada one of the biggest oil producers in the world?Canada announcing ban on Russian oil imports.
World Hockey Federation kicking Russian and Belarus off any competition until further notice. HOCKEY
I am not aware of their political reality but they should consider that when joining NATO they will become one of the battlegrounds for superpowers to flex their muscles.
Last edited:
Their conclusion is the product of their way of thinking limited by their values and education.
El Pistolero
Banned
Agreed. Also, European leaders are fed up with how Russia conducted itself during the last 10-15 years, interfering with their affairs, sowing discord and influencing some parties and decisions...This is their "enough is enough!" moment. I think nobody expected Germany to cut all ties, including the russian regime...
Amiga
Member
talking about a hypothetical direct conflict between NATO and Russia not this war.
And there are bunkers for the people who decide to use the nukes, so they don't plan on dying. they assume they can survive the day after, populations are resources that could be re-farmed or labilities that need to be dumped.
Wildebeest
Member
The message from the British MoD has been that this thing is going to drag and be very ugly for a long time. We have been amused by the propaganda victories so far, but we can't mistake that for a silver lining. People are processing it at different speeds. Some still think we could just send troops in to intervene. Others think that it is funny that Russia are hurting economically and don't realize how bad the economic consequences are going to be for everyone, including effects on food security. Others think that Russia are still somehow sane and proportional in their actions and will just pull out and only bluff about the use of the worst weapons.
TheDreadLord
Member
The latest informations arriving indicate that Russia has like 50km+ of armed vehicles 35km North of Kyiv. It seems to be a massive firepower capacity and probably preparing to storm Kyiv… If the city resists this attack it will be a massive win for Ukraine.
Last edited:
Craig of War
Banned
Do i need to remind you that no one survive Nuke this is not Fallout 4 this is real life Russia and USA have enough Nukes to destroy the Planet like 10x over nobody wins with Nukes period. Watch this vid and see how devastating nukes are if we ever use nukes we will use it on the Alien invasion from space not on each other cause nobody wins afterwards.
Last edited:
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
What? lol
///PATRIOT
Banned
I believe there is no Nuke threat even NATO involving directly and destroying Russia forces in Ukraine. It makes no sense for Russia to launch their Nukes when they KNOW the Americans ALSO have nuclear submarines around the world ready to Nuke Russia.
Last edited:
TheDreadLord
Member
They directly border Russia. Where do you think the conflict would happen? In Paris? It is a decision that their government and population need to think very thoroughly.
Last edited:
bitbydeath
Member
I wonder if Russia got the zombie gun finished.
www.zdnet.com
Russians test a gun that turns people into zombies
Russian President Vladimir Putin says a mind-control gun may be ready within a decade.
www.zdnet.com
EverydayBeast
ChatGPT 0.001
Soviet Union map vs today
InverseAgonist
Banned
I have a useful heuristic: never listen to anybody who says "nuke" instead of "nuclear". Served me well since my visit to JHU SAIS.
Last edited:
STARSBarry
Gold Member
Ahem...
Trident (UK nuclear programme) - Wikipedia
You know we Brits would like to remind the planet on occasion that we can and hopefully never will nuke the bastards should they try... for the benefit of mutually assured destruction of course.
Not just the Yanks.
Last edited:
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
They are FAR safer in NATO than they are on their own as Ukraine has demonstrated.
Smart money says no.I wonder if Russia got the zombie gun finished.
Russians test a gun that turns people into zombies
Russian President Vladimir Putin says a mind-control gun may be ready within a decade.
Last edited:
Amiga
Member
Craig of War
Banned
Good luck with radiation you won't be able to come out of the bunker for 1000 plus years you probably die in the bunker lol
Last edited:
It's difficult to imagine the type of self-centered people that would attempt to live in those having any proper sense of community that would contribute to their longevity.
Prideful denial tombs.
NeonGhost
uses 'M$' - What year is it? Not 2002.
Rather die In a bunker than by radiation
Craig of War
Banned
How bout no Nukes so that we all can enjoy the fresh air and not have to go into a bunker
So by cannibalism?
bitbydeath
Member
Some people don't care about the ramifications of their actions.
School shooters (for example) would know their fates are sealed for their actions, yet they still go through with it.
Bad people are often glorified, all the time, the world won't forget Hitler anytime soon.
To me feels like some people need to take a break from the thread. All this nuclear shit, because he talked about it. It's not like is a lonely man that will say:" fuck this, i'm going to blew up the world and mother Russia" while everyone just looks at him doing so.
Agent_Nobody
Banned
To be fair Putin is the one who just pulled the nuke card, and one could argue he himself isn't thinking straight considering this utter shitshow.
belmarduk
Member
Belarus is allied with Russia, they may as well meet in Norilsk.
JayK47
Member
Glad to know the billionaires will be doing fine.
jufonuk
not tag worthy
Also why did they put the food bay at the top closest to the radiation?
Yeah but they won't be able to eat their money or profit from minimum wage workers under shitty contracts.
Last edited:
01011001
Banned
never underestimate the egotistical stupidity of dictators.
InverseAgonist
Banned
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Yeah I agree. If you are worried about nuclear war you need to take a step away from all this.
GeorgioCostanzaX
Member
An analyst on CNN had a good point: Russia's threshold for using nukes is way lower than the west and they allow for the use of tactical nukes in their war strategy: it's not always a case of using ICBMs and the reciprocal response that would trigger.
Full disclosure my concept of tactical nuke is that they are way smaller and could fit atop a very small missile or artillery shell in some cases so the damage is limited to a small area with less fallout. My view is totally based on video games and Star Ship Troopers though so for all I know a suitcase sized Nuke has as much megaton power as Fatman and Little Boy over Japan.
Tactical Nuke (Civ4)
The Tactical Nuke is the smaller and less powerful weapon of mass destruction weapon available to any civilization. Compared to the ICBM, which has no limit to where it can strike, the Tactical Nuke has a range of about 50 squares. The amount of damage done to any city or object on the map by a...
civilization.fandom.com
Last edited:
InverseAgonist
Banned
An analyst on CNN had a good point Russia's threshold for using nukes is way lower than the west and they allow for the use of tactical nukes in their war strategy: it's not always a case of using ICBMs and the reciprocal response that would trigger.
Full disclosure my concept of tactical nuke is that the damage is limited to a small area with less fall out based on video games and Star ship troopers:
Tactical Nuke (Civ4)
The Tactical Nuke is the smaller and less powerful weapon of mass destruction weapon available to any civilization. Compared to the ICBM, which has no limit to where it can strike, the Tactical Nuke has a range of about 50 squares. The amount of damage done to any city or object on the map by a...
CNN is filled with idiots. Russian doctrine does not have a lower threshold than the Americans do -- both allow for limited nuclear use under specific circumstances. The en vogue term over the last 24 hours has been "Escalate to de-escalate" which is found nowhere in Russian doctrine, but rather was coined by American military officials in a Congressional hearing.
The Kremlin reaffirmed in a 2020 defense document that it will only consider the nuclear option under two circumstances: 1) as a retaliatory measure against the use of nuclear weapons or other WMDs, or 2) when "the very existence of the state is in jeopardy."
This topic is getting annoying.
12Goblins
Lil’ Gobbie
Last edited:
Batiman
Banned
He looks happy
01011001
Banned
trumptards at it again lol
in other news, Putin clearly not scared someone will fucking snap his neck any second now, hence this totally normal way to talk to his top officials
DaleinCalgary
Member
There hasn't been any Russian oil imports since 2019. Probably only happened for east coast people.
NeonGhost
uses 'M$' - What year is it? Not 2002.
Lmao nobody is gonna use my bunker but me
Lord Panda
The Sea is Always Right
Wish the US would send in squadrons of A10s and Apaches to aggressively 'observe' the convoy.
Last edited:
RoyalLaFlame
Banned
The amount of propaganda on the internet is scary. This conflict has shown me that 99% of people are too naive, completely oblivious, and treat these serious matters with such a level of ignorance and tribalism that makes my head hurt. And it's funny because most say how only one side has propaganda, while the other is full of truths and are excused of doing whatever the fuck they want for their own gain.
Anyway, yesterday I had the opportunity to talk with some Russian people and people from Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. They don't agree and strongly condemn Putin's actions, and they hate what's happening right now, because sanctions to Russia will affect them also. But I guess most won't care, and you know why.
Anyway, yesterday I had the opportunity to talk with some Russian people and people from Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. They don't agree and strongly condemn Putin's actions, and they hate what's happening right now, because sanctions to Russia will affect them also. But I guess most won't care, and you know why.
Last edited:
Scum
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Charge him with treason when he returns and throw his ass in Gitmo.
Let him see what really happens when you fight for foreign governments that are hostile to the US.
Not really. Putin fanboy more than anything and not patriotic at all. Left before Trump actually (IIRC)
Here's an article about him.
War of Words: Meet the Texan Trolling for Putin
In 2014, Russell Bonner Bentley was a middle-aged arborist living in Austin. Now he’s a local celebrity in a war-torn region of Ukraine. His journey reveals a troubling development in Putin’s information war.
www.texasmonthly.com
Last edited:
A fat drawling halfwit of little use fits right in with those troops.
Vestal
Junior Member
Oh look a traitor... Someone so Starspangled awesome that they decide to fight against democracy.
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
He paid for the whole table he will use the whole table.trumptards at it again lol
in other news, Putin clearly not scared someone will fucking snap his neck any second now, hence this totally normal way to talk to his top officials
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Seizing assets is a huge step up in financial warfare from the US. It's one thing to freeze the assets of these assholes until the sanctions are dropped. Seizing them is a whole other matter. It's one thing to hold out until the bank clears your deposit. It's a whole other world when the bank just takes your shit and tells you to pound sand.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked