The Faceless Master
Member
This one? EDIT: Nevermind, this one's already unlocked.
Even so, how exactly would I go about unlocking one from T-Mobile?
oh wow, that one. yeah, that has AT&T and T-Mobile bands
This one? EDIT: Nevermind, this one's already unlocked.
Even so, how exactly would I go about unlocking one from T-Mobile?
oh wow, that one. yeah, that has AT&T and T-Mobile bands
Is there any difference between the T-Mobile unlocked version and the AT&T unlocked version?
I read it. It's pentile. Pentile is infuriating, especially for video content, nearly all of which is already chroma subsampled.
Sounds like they're using the S4 pixel arrangement instead of the Note II's, which was kind of assy. gsmarena's write-up on the screen almost sounds like advertisement:I'm curious can you give us an example of how furious we should be about this screen quality?
The display technology is, again, Super AMOLED but this time the matrix isn't RGB but PenTile, however at these insane ppi levels there's no visible pixelation whatsoever.
...
The screen on the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is among the best we've seen here at HQ. It has practically infinite contrast, impeccable viewing angles and colors that pop out of the frame like nothing else.
So back to pentile? Hmm.
Yeah, i'm waiting on the GN4 too. This thread doesn't even have the right title. The phone is called the Samsung GALAXY Note 3, not III.Well, skipping the Note 3 then.
The Note II pixel arrangement was awesome. Maybe you mean the GS3?Sounds like they're using the S4 pixel arrangement instead of the Note II's, which was kind of assy. gsmarena's write-up on the screen almost sounds like advertisement:
Yeah, i'm waiting on the GN4 too. This thread doesn't even have the right title. The phone is called the Samsung GALAXY Note 3, not III.
The Note II pixel arrangement was awesome. Maybe you mean the GS3?
Yeah, you're right. My mistake.The Note II pixel arrangement was awesome. Maybe you mean the GS3?
So. No way in hell I can get this for a decent price off contract right? I have a year to go on my Verizon contract and really want one of these.
What is your current phone?
You can sell your iPhone and buy the Note outright. Your total out of pocket cost should be a little less than if you were paying the new contract price.
I'm curious can you give us an example of how furious we should be about this screen quality?
Upgrading every year is psycho anyway. The Note 2 will easily take me to my next natural upgrade.
But it might not be another note if Rom support isn't better.
Is the processor closed off in the note 3 like the exynos is on the note 2?
So. No way in hell I can get this for a decent price off contract right? I have a year to go on my Verizon contract and really want one of these.
Doesn't help with what? You mean it doesn't help with speculative image quality?I'm exactly "skip the Note 3 and wait for a true 1080p phone with a stylus" furious.
The low brightness on the screen doesn't help either.
I don't understand how they're still complaining about the plastic build when they practically came all over themselves talking about the plastic Iphone 5c.[url="http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/30/samsung-galaxy-note-3-review/]Engadget review[/url]
Glowing review of everything except the internal speaker.
Doesn't help with what? You mean it doesn't help with speculative image quality?
You're applying a "sight unseen" policy to the absolute worst thing you could.
I don't understand how they're still complaining about the plastic build when they practically came all over themselves talking about the plastic Iphone 5c.
But, whatever, to each their own.
I don't understand how they're still complaining about the plastic build when they practically came all over themselves talking about the plastic Iphone 5c.
But, whatever, to each their own.
The chart shows the brightness of 10 other high-end smartphones.
The Note III ranks lowest among them.
The thing about objective measurements is that they're objective. I don't need to buy a Note III and take it outside to be disappointed by the brightness. I can be disappointed from the comfort of my home just by reading that chart.
Same goes for pentile. The Note III's screen is large enough that it would piss me off. I know this from using other pentile devices. I don't want to see sawtooth color fringing on my text and UI. Video content is almost all 4:2:2 or 4:2:0. With 4:2:2 you lose 1/2 the color resolution from the video's subsampling, then 1/2 again from the pentile display, leaving you with 1/4 chroma resolution. With 4:2:0 it's 1/4 * 1/2 = 1/8. No fucking thanks.
You could argue you get full resolution from the greens and half resolution on the blue and red so you're "only" reduced by a factor of 2/3 from the pentile display, but you're still seeing the full 50% loss on two channels of color, and that loss of color and the fringing it produces is what's noticeable.
iPhone 5.
The Galaxy Note 3 has the newest generation of OLED display technology. The Lab tests show that it is better than the Note II in every measurement category, and also comparable or better than the display on the Galaxy S4. It has double the resolution of the Note II, which is a major improvement, but the most impressive advancement for the Note 3 is its significantly brighter screen, which hits an incredible 660 cd/m2 in high ambient light, the brightest mobile display we have ever tested in the Shoot-Out series. An impressive achievement for OLEDs!
just because both phones are made out of plastic doesn't mean the quality is the same...
I really don't understand places like the Verge considering 'Still too big for many people' as a con.
Do car reviewers judge a Minivan and say 'Still too big for many people, should have bought a hatchback'?
high quality plastic!!!! lol
More like a big 4 door sedan...I really don't understand places like the Verge considering 'Still too big for many people' as a con.
Do car reviewers judge a Minivan and say 'Still too big for many people, should have bought a hatchback'?
Gonna order it on Saturday through AT&T, can't wait.
technically speaking, don't you lose *1/3* of the data from 4:2:2 and then *1/3* of what's left from RGBG Pentile? so, 1/2 vs 2/3 and not 1/4 vs 1/2?
[1][2][3][4]
[5][6][7][8]
[1][1][2][2]
[3][3][4][4]
[1][1][2][2]
[1][1][2][2]
The chart shows the brightness of 10 other high-end smartphones.
The Note III ranks lowest among them.
The thing about objective measurements is that they're objective. I don't need to buy a Note III and take it outside to be disappointed by the brightness. I can be disappointed from the comfort of my home just by reading that chart..
So I'm reading negative things about the display's brightness in this thread, yet...:
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2013/10/samsung-galaxy-note-3-display-how-much-better-is-it/
http://bgr.com/2013/10/01/samsung-galaxy-note-3-display-analysis/
They seem to love it, says it's the brightest AMOLED display yet, great for outdoors.
I understand the concern about PenTile, but the brightness?
DisplayMate.com calls the Galaxy Note 3's screen very impressive.
So I'm pretty sure the screen is awesome.