Seems like with Japanese third party developers it’s a wrap for full console exclusives.

SNG32

Member
What I mean by full console I mean not going on PC. Just sticking to one platform either Nintendo or PlayStation consoles. I know Duskbloods is exclusive to Switch 2 but something tells me it's timed.
 
They're too used to develop for a single platform, the most popular one at the moment, I guess that's why many of them do so even up to these days Switch started getting many third party exclusives and not because hit money hating, that's just like Japanese devs work I guess
 
It is no longer financially viable to develop for just one platform and limit your total addressable market, especially with how expensive games are to develop now

I imagine Nintendo will find it easy to get some timed or partial exclusivity for smaller Japanese titles, but other than that, yeah, the era of third party exclusives from Japanese publishers is probably at an end.
 
I just downloaded the T-Pose game on PC Gamepass last night. Normally this type of game would have been exclusive on Playstation for a long time, then get a rerelease years later on Xbox and NEVER come to PC.
 
Nah, I don't buy this. Both Sony and Nintendo will fund exclusives. Maybe it's over when it comes to those 3rd parties own decisions without backing. I could see that.
 
Last edited:
Yeah things have gotten much better for everyone when it comes to this, specially for PC bros.

Seeing Atlus releasing their games day 1 was unthinkable just a few years ago.
 
Last edited:
Nintendo is paying for it's development, so I'd say it has about the same chances as the Bayonetta titles.
FromSoft owns the IP and is self publishing in Japan. There is a very reasonable chance it comes at least to PC, based on how similar past Nintendo deals have gone.
 
What I mean by full console I mean not going on PC. Just sticking to one platform either Nintendo or PlayStation consoles. I know Duskbloods is exclusive to Switch 2 but something tells me it's timed.
It's probably timed.
Miyazaki said before he doesn't want to exclude platforms anymore and with Sony buying more shares of Kadokawa and From it would be weird.
I assume it will release for the other platforms after a few months, and that Is probably a good thing since online games need an active playerbase to exist.
 
It's probably timed.
Miyazaki said before he doesn't want to exclude platforms anymore and with Sony buying more shares of Kadokawa and From it would be weird.
I assume it will release for the other platforms after a few months, and that Is probably a good thing since online games need an active playerbase to exist.
Even if it's timed, it negates the whole premise of this thread. They are still doing exclusives, even if they're timed. Death Stranding 2 is also timed exclusive.
 
Games cost too much to make and it seldom pays off for big third-party IPs to stay exclusive. It often hurts those IPs more than not nowadays.
 
Nah, I don't buy this. Both Sony and Nintendo will fund exclusives. Maybe it's over when it comes to those 3rd parties own decisions without backing. I could see that.
Sony isn't going to pay for full exclusivity. Not even their own first party games are exclusive to PlayStation. Timed exclusivity maybe.
 
Where did you got From owns the IP? Also, what similar deals?
The copyright notice only credits From in the Japanese videos. Nintendo is only credited in the western videos, where they are only listed as the publisher. In the Japanese listing, Nintendo has no attribution at all.

Nintendo made similar deals in the past, largely with Square (Octopath Traveler, Triangle Strategy, Bravely Default) and Capcom (Monster Hunter Rise, Monster Hunter Stories). Those were all third party titles that the third party self-published in Japan, but Nintendo published and distributed globally. They were all initially Switch exclusive (or at least Switch console exclusive) before eventually coming to PC a year later (and then going everywhere else eventually). The Duskbloods deal seems most similar to those ones.
 
The copyright notice only credits From in the Japanese videos. Nintendo is only credited in the western videos, where they are only listed as the publisher. In the Japanese listing, Nintendo has no attribution at all.
I'm not sure this means From owns the IP.
Regardless, Nintendo contracted them to make the game and they own that even if they didn't own the IP (as happens with the bayo games).

Nintendo made similar deals in the past, largely with Square (Octopath Traveler, Triangle Strategy, Bravely Default) and Capcom (Monster Hunter Rise, Monster Hunter Stories).
Nintendo didn't fund these, it was a distribution deal.
The Duskbloods deal seems most similar to those ones.
I'd say It's more similiar to Astral Chain, Bayonetta, Marvel Ultimate Alliance 3. Games Nintendo not only distribute but contracted the developers to produce.

Even Platinum Games had to retrieve rights from Nintendo when they decided to re-release the Wonderful 101 just by themselves. Because Nintendo owned the product.
 
I'm not sure this means From owns the IP.
Regardless, Nintendo contracted them to make the game and they own that even if they didn't own the IP (as happens with the bayo games).


Nintendo didn't fund these, it was a distribution deal.

I'd say It's more similiar to Astral Chain, Bayonetta, Marvel Ultimate Alliance 3. Games Nintendo not only distribute but contracted the developers to produce.

Even Platinum Games had to retrieve rights from Nintendo when they decided to re-release the Wonderful 101 just by themselves. Because Nintendo owned the product.
I think we will need to see what kind of deal this is closer to, because the Platinum games are definitely a good point I didn't consider. I don't think Nintendo will have paid enough to keep it exclusive forever, but who knows! But you definitely raised some good points for sure
 
Vanillaware

300-shields-ready.gif
 
Which is why Nintendo haters are hating hard lately. They know 3rd parties are going to pander to the lowest common denominator when making their games, and the Switch 2 isn't going to be ignored.
Cracking Up Lol GIF
 
What I mean by full console I mean not going on PC. Just sticking to one platform either Nintendo or PlayStation consoles. I know Duskbloods is exclusive to Switch 2 but something tells me it's timed.
Nintendo are funding development specifically to highlight the Switch 2's new online capabilities.
 
The days of consoles using some custom exotic hardware with unique capabilities are over. Nowadays they're all just using PC/mobile SOCs, and using cross platform tools/game engines that scale all the way from smartphones to high end PCs.

There is literally zero reason for a game to go console exclusive unless the platform owner is paying for it.
 
AI will significantly reduce game development cost in several years.

I wonder how this impacts the market. On the one hand it will lead to the growth of a number of small independent developers.
On the other hand competition will rise as well.
 
AI will significantly reduce game development cost in several years.

I wonder how this impacts the market. On the one hand it will lead to the growth of a number of small independent developers.
On the other hand competition will rise as well.

You think this will entail console third party exclusives with a.i?
 
The less exclusives the better. Games should be available everywhere.

Disagree. Ideally games should be tailored to the capabilities of their target platform.

The problem we have now is that with so many titles using middleware solutions that rarely happens. Its basically one-size-fits-all with minimal adjustments made for any platform.
 
Sony just released Rise of the Ronin and FFVII Rebirth last year. You can't play those anywhere else (console wise). Death Stranding 2 will be console exclusive to PS5 this year. Kojima is working on another Playstation title as we speak. Nintendo will have those as well.

I'm not sure where you got that information.
 
Sony just released Rise of the Ronin and FFVII Rebirth last year. You can't play those anywhere else (console wise). Death Stranding 2 will be console exclusive to PS5 this year. Kojima is working on another Playstation title as we speak. Nintendo will have those as well.

I'm not sure where you got that information.
Rise of the Robin and Rebirth are both on PC. What I meant by full console exclusive is never showing up on PC or other platforms and third party.
 
Timed exclusives will always be a thing for Sony first party titles and some deals with developers. But yeah, multiplatform is the way to go from now on.

It's as stupid as just selling your product in one big chain and ignoring others. You want it available everywhere
 
Last edited:
Disagree. Ideally games should be tailored to the capabilities of their target platform.

The problem we have now is that with so many titles using middleware solutions that rarely happens. Its basically one-size-fits-all with minimal adjustments made for any platform.
Yup, I used to love consoles because of the level of optimization for their hardware you could get with games. Shit like MGS3, RE4, God of War 2… we don't get that these days where everything is made for uniform hardware using uniform dev tools. The last example of this I remember is Tears of the Kingdom which seemed to push the Switch beyond anything I'd considered possible before, and that was than 2 years ago (and for an 8 year console).

I wish at least Sony would develop their games around their hardware too, but with them going PC more and more, it seems unlikely.
 

How far we've come from this.
 
Rise of the Robin and Rebirth are both on PC. What I meant by full console exclusive is never showing up on PC or other platforms and third party.
FF VII Rebirth wasn't released on PC when it first relased. Same for Rise of the Ronin. And Death Stranding 2 next.

What do you mean by "full console exclusive"? All PS consoles exclusives from PS1 and PS2 days are everywhere like GTA, Devil May Cry, older FF titles, Resident Evil games etc. There isn't such a thing as "full console exclusive" as an eternal thing. They will always end up everywhere once these deals expire.
 
Last edited:
I think timed exclusives will become increasingly rare. Seems like the benefit of a full multi platform launch is exceeding whatever Sony and Nintendo are willing to pay for the timed exclusivity.

But I think we'll continue seeing exclusives were a Japanese developer works as a "second party" (as in the game is actually funded and published by Sony/Nintendo, but it's developed by an external studio)
 
FF VII Rebirth wasn't released on PC when it first relased. Same for Rise of the Ronin. And Death Stranding 2 next.

What do you mean by "full console exclusive"? All PS consoles exclusives from PS1 and PS2 days are everywhere like GTA, Devil May Cry, older FF titles, Resident Evil games etc. There isn't such a thing as "full console exclusive" as an eternal thing. They will always end up everywhere once these deals expire.
Bayonetta's are third party still on switch and not PS or PC. Demon Souls Remake is still on PS5 and not on PC. There's still a few but dwindled.
 
What I mean by full console I mean not going on PC. Just sticking to one platform either Nintendo or PlayStation consoles. I know Duskbloods is exclusive to Switch 2 but something tells me it's timed.
Isn't a third party exclusive game releasing in a few weeks or so? Probably timed too but still this has been the case for a long time, no?
 
Last edited:
I think timed exclusives will become increasingly rare. Seems like the benefit of a full multi platform launch is exceeding whatever Sony and Nintendo are willing to pay for the timed exclusivity.

But I think we'll continue seeing exclusives were a Japanese developer works as a "second party" (as in the game is actually funded and published by Sony/Nintendo, but it's developed by an external studio)

There are advantages for focusing development on a single platform. Playstation is dead in Japan so it makes a ton of sense for a game that's not going to sell well outside of Japan to be Switch exclusive.
 
Top Bottom