Support NeoGAF

[yurinka]

According to your theory, Ubisoft should have put two games on Switch, seen abysmal sales, and moved on. That didn't happen.

I never said that. I said/meant a handful big games (new AAA games, the typical top games of each big publisher).

Ubisoft always supports all platforms even if it's with small/minor games or old ports, including Switch. Ubisoft obviously was going to release here small stuff like Just Dance, Monopoly etc. particularly when it's the only portable in the market.

But I meant their big guns, as would be AC Shadows in Switch 2.

 

[Woopah]

I never said that. I said/meant a handful big games (new AAA games, the typical top games of each big publisher).

Ubisoft always supports all platforms even if it's with small/minor games or old ports, including Switch. Ubisoft obviously was going to release here small stuff like Just Dance, Monopoly etc. particularly when it's the only portable in the market.

But I meant their big guns, as would be AC Shadows in Switch 2.

Your original argument was "Like every generation after the SNES, some 3rd parties will release a game or two on the new Nintendo device, and after getting abysmal sales they'll move on"

What were the Ubisoft games that came to Switch, got abysmal sales and led to them moving on? What were those games for SE or Konami?

A game skipping Switch is not the same as a game coming to Switch and getting abysmal sales.