Danny Dudekisser
I paid good money for this Dynex!
Sega is basically the Yakuza company for me, at this point. But considering that I really like Yakuza, I'm kind of okay with that. They're never gonna be Dreamcast-era Sega again.
I don't remember the exact thing, but Sega has been among the best 3 third party developers in Metacritic for several years in a row. I will try to find the exact source...I agree with OP. Sega is definitely set on the right path. I think you also forgot how some of its games got ported to PC like Vanquish, Bayonetta, the Yakuza series. The Valkyrie series is also wonderful and probably one of the best TRPG series out there.
Well, they could do like Nintendo did and have Nvidia take care of the hardware for them.
I would love to see SEGA come back to hardware. But alas, they cannot keep up with the hardware race any more.
I'm quite happy for them, but at same time wish they would reconsider damping Sonic Team in favor of a new bunch of developers. For the sake of Sonic 3D games.
EhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhFor the sake of this discussion I decided to compare Sega's sore on Metacritic with Nintendo's. Because you know Nintendo games are usually seen as quality titles with attention to detail and very well made while Sega is seen as being the complete opposite? Surprise, their average score isn't that different. Even though the Good to Mixed ratio is better on Nintendo's side.
That's the beauty of these arcade boards. They were out of reach. The pinnacle of graphics technology and a taste of how console/PC games will look in the future. And that was the point of going to the arcades, to see these incredible games an out of reach hardware can render and be impressed. Otherwise why even bother going there to spend money?Some time ago, I was talking to one of the Ex GE Aerospace guys that worked at Real3D - apparently they built some prototype PC 3D accelerator cards based on the same chips as the Model 3, but ended up abandoning the project based largely on cost considerations - it was an expensive chipset anyway, and just using it as a simple rendering accelerator (which was the initial plan) run into the bandwidth limitations of the PCI bus. Adding the necessary hardware to move the geometry processing onto the card would have made it too expensive, even for the professional CAD/CAE type applications they were targeting.
That's the beauty of these arcade boards. They were out of reach. The pinnacle of graphics technology and a taste of how console/PC games will look in the future. And that was the point of going to the arcades, to see these incredible games an out of reach hardware can render and be impressed. Otherwise why even bother going there to spend money?
Well, Sega CS2 has core developers from Sakura Wars and Valkyria Chronicles working on the new Sakura Wars. The director, Tetsuya Ootsubo, previously worked on Sakura Wars 3. Of course that hasn't stopped them from changing the gameplay to something more action-oriented which is where some of the resentment comes from longtime fans.Shin Sakura Wars is made by Sonic Team devs, therefore do we resent the game?
Besides Sakura wars, space channel 5 vr, PSO2 (which took 7 years to release) and Panzer Dragoon remake (however it's a remake of short game so there's a red flag) nothing else Sega is making appeals to me at the moment, Daytona 3 looked underwhelming, am2 is working on a Hatsune Miku game rather than a actual virtual fighter (and you guys want to say Sonic team is the only dev that has problems) no new shining games, Yakuza is going under fatigue with a crappy looking new protagonist, Sonic has too many problems to pinpoint (mania didn't do anything for me, sorry) no 3d puyo pop game, underwhelming ports. And still no vf6 even after verendus hinted at it.
Sega is weakened by multi (the golden compass from last gen has been counted on each console). If you remove scores from fan sites like "Nintendo blabla", "Nintendo something" the gap becomes even tighter.(no Segabits, no sega nerds on Metacritics...).For the sake of this discussion I decided to compare Sega's sore on Metacritic with Nintendo's. Because you know Nintendo games are usually seen as quality titles with attention to detail and very well made while Sega is seen as being the complete opposite? Surprise, their average score isn't that different. Even though the Good to Mixed ratio is better on Nintendo's side.
That's the beauty of these arcade boards. They were out of reach. The pinnacle of graphics technology and a taste of how console/PC games will look in the future. And that was the point of going to the arcades, to see these incredible games an out of reach hardware can render and be impressed. Otherwise why even bother going there to spend money?
Sega has undergone a restructuring and everything that they have been releasing since has been of the highest quality. You might not like the games, but they are well polished, they are translated in the main European languages etc...
There has been a huge focus on quality, and it is very easy to see this (when you actually play the games). I am not going to make a list, this is stupid. But it would be great to stop saying that they have been making shitty games as this is not true anymore for quite some time now.
Until Phantasy Star V happens I can't agree with you, but ehh they have improved somewhat from 2010ish to now I guess.
I dont believe you
If you are talking about the games made by outside studios such as Creative Assembly. Relic or Atlus. Those have always been good studios, making good games even before they were bought by Sega. Their strengths are mostly in JRPGs and PC strategy games. It's Sega's own internal output which has become largely mediocre. They've largely ignored most of their traditional franchises (Virtua Fighter, Sega Rally, Ecco, Jet Set Radio, Phantasy Star, Skies, Golden Axe etc etc). And they've failed to make a decent 3D Sonic game. No one would consider Sega a major developer of AAA games these days.Sega has undergone a restructuring and everything that they have been releasing since has been of the highest quality. You might not like the games, but they are well polished, they are translated in the main European languages etc...
There has been a huge focus on quality, and it is very easy to see this (when you actually play the games). I am not going to make a list, this is stupid. But it would be great to stop saying that they have been making shitty games as this is not true anymore for quite some time now.
These are internal studios.outside studios such as Creative Assembly. Relic or Atlus.
Unleashed, Colors, Lost World, Generations and Forces are all good to great games.And they've failed to make a decent 3D Sonic game.
Wrong there is no good good sonic 3d gameThese are internal studios.
Unleashed, Colors, Lost World, Generations and Forces are all good to great games.
Internal output from Japan is great overall. Maybe go and check/play some of the recent games to see by yourself ?
Can't believe we are still getting this overused narrative 10 years later.
Wrong there is no good good sonic 3d game
They are all worse then the genesis 2d games.
Sonic mania 2 is so obviousI can't disagree here but the 3D games are a good effort. I love Colours for being its own thing.
The 2D games as of late haven't been as good except Mania. I hope SEGA continue to work with Christian Whitehead on keeping Sonic's quality high.
I can't disagree here but the 3D games are a good effort. I love Colours for being its own thing.
The 2D games as of late haven't been as good except Mania. I hope SEGA continue to work with Christian Whitehead on keeping Sonic's quality high.
The 3D Sonic games are such interesting beasts. Each respective year they came out they were great fun. I was obsessed with Sonic Adventure 1 and 2.
Now they're damn near unplayable for me and reek of their respective time periods. I mean I still love 'em, but. Ya know.
I like Adventure 2 over 1 but they are pretty janky.
Hate Heroes/Lost World/Shadoeand got my kicks out of 06 for being terrible.
I think Sonic Team needs a strong producer for the games and keep Sonic to his strengths rather than experiment on each game.
WrongWrong there is no good good sonic 3d game
They're on a roll lately, but I still need that sequel to Skies of Arcadia. At least port Legends to XBL/PSN!
This is a 100% Sega game, so Skies of Arcadia is totally up to them. Keep in mind that it is a massive game, by far the most massive when it was released, and it was developed with pretty old tools. You can't port it that easily. But you can be sure that it is in discussion, especially with Rieko Kodama managing the Sega Ages games, as she was deeply involved in Skies of Arcadia.It has to be a licensing thing
I liked Heroes when it came out, but I can't remember if there was anything weird/terrible about it. I just rented it though, so I didn't spend nearly as much time with it as I did with Adventure 1 + 2.
Never played Shadow for more than five minutes and wow, I forgot Lost World even existed
A lot of people like Sonic Adventure 2 but I personally think Sonic Adventure is the better game. I couldn't actually finish the sequel because I found Crazy Gadget too frustrating. There's a point towards the end where I die every time and run out of lives. I also prefer the individual character select over the sequel's Hero/Dark story selections. I don't even really consider the sequel an Adventure title since they for whatever reason got rid of the open-ended Adventure stages.I like Adventure 2 over 1 but they are pretty janky.
Hate Heroes/Lost World/Shadow and got my kicks out of 06 for being terrible.
I think Sonic Team needs a strong producer for the games and keep Sonic to his strengths rather than experiment on each game.
People don't like Sonic because they grew up and forget that it is targeted towards kids, with the exception of Mania that was strictly targeted at older players.
You are missing the Puyo Tetris and Champion games as well. Sega Ages games from M2, all games from Atlus etc... You get the most solid output from a third party publisher in my opinion. No wonder they have been in the top three places of the publishers in Metacritic for the last 4 years.SEGA's output post-2015 has been incredibly solid and even during their extremely long restructuring (2003-2015) under Sammy, there were plenty of good games, great games and true jewels.
Just looking at the past five years or so, we had:
SEGA JAPAN (AM2, CS3, etc. etc.)
1 - Yakuza 6
2 - Yakuza Kiwami
3 - Yakuza Kiwami 2
4 - Yakuza 0
5 - Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA
6 - Valkyria Chronicles 4
7 - Shining Resonance Refrain
6 - Blade Arcus
7 - Team Sonic Racing
SEGA WEST (Creative Assembly, Amplitude Studios, outsourced..)
8 - Total War: Warhammer
9 - Alien: Isolation
10 - Total War: Warhammer II
11 - Total War: Three Kingdoms
12 - Sonic Mania
13 - Endless Space 2
And I'm not counting the Japan only releases, of which there were plenty.
SEGA has always been an awesome company and even their failures helped drive the industry forward. Unfortunately, their mistakes guarantee that there's not a constituency like Nintendo's willing to greet everything they do as a gift from the Heavens, etc. etc.
A lot of people like Sonic Adventure 2 but I personally think Sonic Adventure is the better game. I couldn't actually finish the sequel because I found Crazy Gadget too frustrating. There's a point towards the end where I die every time and run out of lives. I also prefer the individual character select over the sequel's Hero/Dark story selections. I don't even really consider the sequel an Adventure title since they for whatever reason got rid of the open-ended Adventure stages.
You are missing the Puyo Tetris and Champion games as well. Sega Ages games from M2, all games from Atlus etc... You get the most solid output from a third party publisher in my opinion. No wonder they have been in the top three places of the publishers in Metacritic for the last 4 years.
Lets not forget that this company continues to make games like Sonic Forces and makes anime Shining Force games. Sega’s output on the mastersystem, saturn, genesis, and game gear is not even close to being matched by what the company is doing now.