• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sharp says it faces material doubt on survival, $5.6 billion full-year loss

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sharp Says It Faces Material Doubt on Survival

By Mariko Yasu and Naoko Fujimura - Nov 1, 2012 4:01 PM GMT+0100

Sharp Corp., (6753), the world’s worst- performing major stock, said there was “material doubt” about its ability to survive after forecasting a record $5.6 billion full-year loss on falling demand for its display panels.
The net loss will probably be 450 billion yen in the year ending March 31, the Osaka-based TV maker said in a statement yesterday, scrapping its earlier projection for a 250 billion- yen loss. The new forecast compares with the 296 billion-yen loss average of 17 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg.


Sharp has failed to win a planned 67 billion-yen investment from Taiwan’s Foxconn Technology Group and has had difficulty selling commercial paper as it burns through cash. The company said its loss for the six months ended Sept. 30 was “huge,” stemming from falling prices for liquid-crystal-display panels, delays at an LCD factory and declining sales in Japan and China. The company’s warning echoes that made by chipmaker Elpida Memory Inc. before it filed for bankruptcy in February.

“Sharp is in a desperate situation as it tries to deal with short-term funding problems,” said Ichiro Takamatsu, a fund manager at Tokyo-based Bayview Asset Management, which oversees 150 billion yen. “It doesn’t have a long-term vision except for its plan to sell more small- and mid-sized LCDs.”

Foxconn Partnership

Sharp follows Panasonic Corp. (6752) in predicting losses worse than analysts estimated after losing ground to Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) in TVs. In contrast, Sony Corp. (6758) reiterated its forecast for a first annual profit in five years after slashing costs, exiting panel ventures and trimming its TV lineup.

“Sharp is in circumstances in which material doubt about its assumed going concern is found,” the company said in a statement to the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

The company’s turnaround plan includes seeking voluntary retirements, cutting salaries, selling assets and reducing capital investments, it said. Japan’s largest maker of liquid- crystal displays also is considering several partnerships as talks with Foxconn continue, President Takashi Okuda said.

“I seriously take to heart that we had to add that comment,” Okuda said. “We will revive our earnings and trust from investors as soon as possible. We will show that with a result.”

Sharp fell 1.7 percent to 169 yen at the close in Tokyo trading before the announcement. The stock has plunged 75 percent this year, the worst performer among more than 1,600 companies in the MSCI World (MXWO) Index.

Sony, Panasonic

Panasonic, Japan’s second-biggest TV maker, said Oct. 31 it expected a 765 billion-yen full-year net loss, or 30 times bigger than analysts had estimated, citing restructuring costs and falling demand for its products. Osaka-based Panasonic said it won’t pay a dividend for the first time since 1950 because of an “urgent need” to improve its financial position.

Sony, Japan’s biggest consumer-electronics exporter, kept its full-year net-income forecast unchanged at 20 billion yen even as it unexpectedly posted a seventh straight quarterly loss on slumping demand for Bravia TVs and Cyber-shot cameras.

Operating loss at the home-entertainment unit, which includes the TV operations, shrank to 15.8 billion yen in the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with 41.8 billion yen a year earlier, Sony said in a statement.

The company is ahead of its plan to turn around the TV business, Chief Executive Officer Kazuo Hirai said in October. Tokyo-based Sony has halved the number of Bravia models sold in the U.S. and Japan to a combined 39 from 79.

‘Drastic Measures’

Sharp widened its full-year forecast for operating loss for LCDs to 132 billion yen from 105 billion yen, saying it took a 53.5 billion-yen writedown on its large LCD inventory and sales of small LCDs fell below estimates.

Global TV demand is expected to remain little changed in 2013 after shipments of all TV types declined more than 4 percent this year, researcher DisplaySearch said.

Sharp also posted a 61 billion-yen charge on deferred tax assets and took a 30.1 billion-yen writedown on equipment for solar-panel production.

“Sharp must take drastic measures or else banks will give up on it,” said Makoto Kikuchi, chief executive officer at Myojo Asset Management Japan Co., a Tokyo-based hedge fund advisory firm.

Elpida Bankruptcy

Elpida filed for bankruptcy after losing money for five quarters. The company had liabilities of 448 billion yen after falling prices for its computer-memory chips and a stronger yen eroded earnings and left it unable to pay debt.

Elpida said Feb. 14 it wasn’t making enough progress in obtaining needed financing, and “therefore, material uncertainty about its assumed going concern is found.” That note was added to financial results for the previous quarter.

Sharp, the century-old inventor of mechanical pencils, has put up properties, including its headquarters, as collateral to raise funds. Sharp turned to its main banks Mizuho Financial Group Inc. (8411) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. as it struggled to refinance debt after Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service cut its credit ratings to junk.

The banks contributed to a total of about 360 billion yen in loans by the end of September, Sharp said.

The electronics maker has been renegotiating terms for a proposed stake sale to Taipei-based Foxconn after widening its full-year loss forecast eightfold in August, triggering a slide in its share price. Foxconn agreed in March to invest 67 billion yen for a 9.9 percent stake in Sharp at 550 yen a share.

Sharp assumes a deal can be reached, Okuda said.

Sharp sold a stake in an LCD factory in central Japan to Foxconn founder Terry Gou earlier this year to jointly run the facility, considered the most advanced in the industry.

Shipments of smartphone panels were delayed after a defect was found during testing, Sharp said in August. The company also said its plant making displays for tablet computers was underutilized.

“The company’s financial situation is getting increasingly severe,” said Keita Wakabayashi, a Tokyo-based analyst at Mito Securities Co. “Sharp will have difficulties trying to improve its finances and find partners at the same time.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...year-loss-forecast-to-record-5-6-billion.html
 

Pagusas

Elden Member
But if Sharp goes under, who'll supply 3D screens for the 3DS?

Just because the company "goes under" doesnt mean its technology, plants and products disappear. It just means someone will either buy the company and continue making the products that sell and completely restructure the business or they will wait for the company to go into liquidation and buy up the pieces and agreements at great deals.
 
I'll just repost my comments from the Panasonic is doomed thread:
In 1992 a typical 35" CRT TV costed upwards of $2000 USD. Consumers wanted cheap. Manufacturers achieved it and went beyond. Now you can get 50+" TVs for under $500. All the while sacrificing margins and quality. Now consumers expect their future TVs to also be low-margin $500 units and expect them to last over a decade. So here we are with almost all the major electronics players struggling because they gave consumers what they wanted.

Edit:
It seems like the internet wants all the hardware companies in the world to be like Google. Offer software/web services and make most of their money on that and offer the hardware at cost!
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man

TVs are commoditized. What this means is that for the vast majority of cases, consumers are not buying based on features. One TV is another TV is another TV. Like if you're buying bananas, the brand of the banana is not relevant. Or if you're buying staples or paperclips or ballbearings. When this happens, there's still lots of profit to be had in an industry, but it will only be had by firms who can compete on price and eke out a living through increasingly small margins.

You might feel the need to respond with "But I bought a 240hz OLED UHDTV 70" 3DTV that is a Google Web TV oh and it's that kind with no bezel and I spent $87,451 on the TV!!!"--yes, there are customers like you. But the industry as a whole is a goner.
 
Got my 60" 120Hz Aquos for $800 last Black Friday.

Sorry, I did my part Sharp =/

Do you really believe that the cost of production of any 60" TV is lower than $800?

Of course you bought on Black Friday, so it's a special case, but Sharp are currently selling massive screen TVs for less than production cost to gain market share in the US. They are poisoning the well for large screen TVs and making consumer expectations too high (or low in this case) for pricing. Even Samsung don't sell LCD TVs for that kind of price in those sizes, and Sony sell just one 65" at $4499 which has proved pretty successful.

Sharp will go bankrupt, but their bankruptcy will poison the well for all other major CE players by commoditising ultra large screen TVs just like large screen TVs were by LG and Samsung.
 

AAequal

Banned
Another horrible year for big five it seems. Or has NEC posted their results yet? Maybe they will surprise us.
 

Opiate

Member
Is Sharp a high end or low end TV manufacturer? I'm sure they make a bit of both, but what are they known for?
 
Is Sharp a high end or low end TV manufacturer? I'm sure they make a bit of both, but what are they known for?

They make the super high end Elite, but they also make dross. The dross has given consumers unrealistic expectations over pricing of ultra large screen TVs and killed sales of their more expensive large screen sets.

They are run by idiots.
 

Brimstone

my reputation is Shadowruined
They are going to close their Solar Panel units in Europe and United States. Once again green energy flops.
 
Is Sharp a high end or low end TV manufacturer? I'm sure they make a bit of both, but what are they known for?

Both. They took over the Elite line from Pioneer; though it's LCD tech instead of plasmas, it's the best LCD tv you can get on the market and certainly costs like a Pioneer Elite did.

They make the super high end Elite, but they also make dross. The dross has given consumers unrealistic expectations over pricing of ultra large screen TVs and killed sales of their more expensive large screen sets.

They are run by idiots.

Yeah, Sharp marketing their lower end-mid ranges being "OMG 60-70 inches" tvs at such relatively cheaper prices than you would expect really warped the perception.
 
I've shopped for a new TV 5 times in the last decade.

Every time I can't even remember Sharp exists until I go looking around.

They used to have quite a bit of marketing.. but I guess it never "stuck" with me.
 
Manufactures in China are on the prowl. There have been lots of allegations of Chinese manufactures stealing OLED tech.

Why do you think Sony repatriated manufacturing of their high end and professional products to Japan? CLED is their next big tech and they haven't let it out of Japan (or the UK) for fear of Samsung or a Chinese company stealing the IP.
 

AAequal

Banned
How long until one of the big five in Japan goes belly up? How many years in a row can these companies take these kind of losses?

I've shopped for a new TV 5 times in the last decade.

Every time I can't even remember Sharp exists until I go looking around.

They used to have quite a bit of marketing.. but I guess it never "stuck" with me.
I have never seen a Sharp TV here :D
 
How long until one of the big five in Japan goes belly up? How many years in a row can these companies take these kind of losses?

Sharp are first in line, then probably Panasonic. Sony, NEC and Fujitsu are in pretty good shape. Outside of that, Toshiba, Hitachi and Mitsubishi are diversified enough to withstand another major shock. Actually so are Sony (with their finance and insurance divisions).
 

Mohonky

Member
I'll just repost my comments from the Panasonic is doomed thread:


Just to re-itterate as some one that was a salesperson: that is exactly the problem, and to be honest it's worse in Australia. Nearly every week there's some shit on TV about 'shopping around for the best deal' and with retailers struggling so badly for business they are absolutely gutting the price of everything. If people have to pay even half the RRP they think they are being ripped off.

So as a result you end up with stores taking a loss, then demanding suppliers to incur that loss and reimburse them, then the supplier is loosing margin so they are hitting up the manufacturer.

Everyone wants the latest and greatest, they expect it to last forever and they expect to pay diddly shit for it. Some thing has to give some where.
 

Azih

Member
Just to re-itterate as some one that was a salesperson: that is exactly the problem, and to be honest it's worse in Australia. Nearly every week there's some shit on TV about 'shopping around for the best deal' and with retailers struggling so badly for business they are absolutely gutting the price of everything. If people have to pay even half the RRP they think they are being ripped off.

So as a result you end up with stores taking a loss, then demanding suppliers to incur that loss and reimburse them, then the supplier is loosing margin so they are hitting up the manufacturer.

Everyone wants the latest and greatest, they expect it to last forever and they expect to pay diddly shit for it. Some thing has to give some where.

Isn't this a kind of deflation? Scary.
 

navanman

Crown Prince of Custom Firmware
They are going to close their Solar Panel units in Europe and United States. Once again green energy flops.
The entire Solar industry is a flop, my company is pulling out too, no money to be made in it when a wafer costs justs $4.
 

Pagusas

Elden Member
This is why I wonder about the Apple TV and what its going to do to the landscape. Will Apple entering the field cause a revival of the higher priced/feature packed sets that put a premium on quality? Or will it just further drive the other manufacturers into the hole.

Speaking of which, I'm in the market for a 65 - 75" screen, any one have any good recommendations? Budget is about 4k.
 
TVs are commoditized. What this means is that for the vast majority of cases, consumers are not buying based on features. One TV is another TV is another TV. Like if you're buying bananas, the brand of the banana is not relevant. Or if you're buying staples or paperclips or ballbearings. When this happens, there's still lots of profit to be had in an industry, but it will only be had by firms who can compete on price and eke out a living through increasingly small margins.

You might feel the need to respond with "But I bought a 240hz OLED UHDTV 70" 3DTV that is a Google Web TV oh and it's that kind with no bezel and I spent $87,451 on the TV!!!"--yes, there are customers like you. But the industry as a whole is a goner.

Then that's the end-game for all electronics without lucrative consumer-side contracts. Stagnation and regression here we come.
 

gatti-man

Member
So when I need a Kuro quality set I'm screwed? Looks like I'm going full on projector for my next set if sharp and Panasonic both hit the bricks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom