Skyward Sword review thread [Newest Reviews - Cubed3 10/10, GC: A, AusGamers: 7/10]

All right I'm getting super tired... how many hours left ._.?
 
AniHawk said:
well the controls would obviously not suck then.
I'm not sure how controls that take considerably less effort than pressing a joystick in a different direction can suck. Yes making sharp turns with the thing like in the demo sucks, but going forward naturally, pressing A really isn't difficult nor does it suck nor is it bad controls
 
AceBandage said:
Regardless, it's just sounds like they are reaching for something to complain about.
It's like when they reviewed Fire Emblem Wii and complained about poor use of Miis.



face%20pliskin.JPG


220px-SnakeEyesPoster.jpg
 
Big One said:
I'm not sure how controls that take considerably less effort than pressing a joystick in a different direction can suck. Yes making sharp turns with the thing like in the demo sucks, but going forward naturally, pressing A really isn't difficult nor does it suck nor is it bad controls
the wing flapping is terrible and ruins the entire game.
 
Oh well, it's better for me to go back to bed then XD See you guys in 4 hours! Don't start this without me!
 
Tadale said:
I think I'll be watching this meltdown on a nice five hour delay. Give it some time to let the real crazy come out.

Nah that is to long, we need about 30 mins to an hour after the first bad review for the crazies to drown out the rationale people and then rant until all are band in the three hours following that.
 
TruePrime said:
Nah that is to long, we need about 30 mins to an hour after the first bad review for the crazies to drown out the rationale people and then rant until all are band in the three hours following that.

It'll still be here when I wake up, or someone will take screenshots.
 
Big One said:
If he does it'll potentially be the blunder of review gaming this year. The bird control certainly isn't shitty based off the demo I've played
That'll be taken by whoever docks it for not having a CC/GCN controller option.
 
The second variation of the Romance Theme is probably one of the, if not literally the, most beautiful romance-related OST I've ever heard composed for a video game.
 
I 'd be surprised if GameTrailers gave it a 10 review score. I think some of their highest rated games include Super Mario Galaxy (9.8), Super Mario Galaxy 2 (9.7), Twilight Princess (9.7) and Mass Effect 2 (9.7).
 
I'll do what I did with Uncharted 3. I'll talk about the reviews until the stupid shit starts, and then I will reduce myself to an observer if it gets too bad.
 
So how bad does a post have to be before it gets someone banned? Simply discussing a review can't get me banned (assuming the post is reasonable) can it?
 
ivysaur12 said:
Are people more hyped for the reviews than the actual game?
This is it for me, my most hyped events of the year for gaming.

1. Gundam Extreme Vs.

2. Internet Reaction to Skyward Sword

3. Skyward Sword.
 
pramath said:
So how bad does a post have to be before it gets someone banned? Simply discussing a review can't get me banned (assuming the post is reasonable) can it?
Why would GAF give out bannings for opinions?
 
pramath said:
So how bad does a post have to be before it gets someone banned? Simply discussing a review can't get me banned (assuming the post is reasonable) can it?


Freak outs = Banned
Calm Rational Discussion = Fine
 
ivysaur12 said:
Are people more hyped for the reviews than the actual game?

This thread would lead you to believe there is a MEGATON conference or something, it's just stupid numbers and text from stupid people:[

No offense to any of them of course.
 
ivysaur12 said:
Are people more hyped for the reviews than the actual game?
This is NeoGAF™

TheGreatMightyPoo said:
This thread would lead you to believe there is a MEGATON conference or something, it's just stupid numbers and text from stupid people:[

No offense to any of them of course.
(slap)
 
brandonh83 said:
I'll do what I did with Uncharted 3. I'll talk about the reviews until the stupid shit starts, and then I will reduce myself to an observer if it gets too bad.
lol, this is pretty much my method also.
 
People can discuss reviews, they can critique reviews, and they can be upset if they want to. I'm not going to ban for that.

It's when discussion devolves into vicious attacks and pure mania that someone needs to step in.
 
Big One said:
Why would GAF give out bannings for opinions?
I don't know, but saying that a Mag or reviewer is trying to low ball a review or make a name for themselves is pretty fucking retarded no matter how much you want to believe it.
 
pramath said:
So how bad does a post have to be before it gets someone banned? Simply discussing a review can't get me banned (assuming the post is reasonable) can it?

I guess if the post is 3/4 insults, that's bad.
 
AceBandage said:
Freak outs = Banned
Calm Rational Discussion = Fine
Gotcha.
This should be fun to watch :P

Big One said:
Why would GAF give out bannings for opinions?
I don't know, I am fairly new here, I don't know how it all works, and I want to be able to discuss the reviews without being constantly afraid of a banning
 
Top Bottom