balladofwindfishes
Member
More like, "I like birds a lot and see no realistic way talons that would support Falco's body weight would fit in those boots of the wind fishes."
More like, "I like birds a lot and see no realistic way talons that would support Falco's body weight would fit in those boots of the wind fishes."
More like, "I like birds a lot and see no realistic way talons that would support Falco's body weight would fit in those boots of the wind fishes."
I like birds a lot
That almost seems... contradictory
That almost seems... contradictory
Falco is a bird that stands 100% upright, has hands made of wings, no real chest musculature to support flight, the intelligence of a human, and is able to speak like a human despite not having lips but it's the feet that bother you? He's a cartoon character. His anatomy is not supposed to make sense.
I would understand you if Falco's feet were at all important to his character design in Star Fox, but they aren't, and bringing up anatomy as a reason why they are bad is just silly, especially for a character that has never been seen barefoot.Eh, that's a lazy defense for a terrible design. Look at Popeye, he has exaggerations but at the same time his design doesn't feel wonky because of his gimmick.
Hell look at Ratchet or Sly.
I would understand you if Falco's feet were at all important to his character design in Star Fox, but they aren't, and bringing up anatomy as a reason why they are bad is just silly, especially for a character that has never been seen barefoot.
I really don't know what you're getting at, and you seem to be arguing from the position that it's badness is self evident, which it isn't. Your point on female chests is especially confusing--are you arguing that bringing up anatomy is valid or invalid?well we are assessing overall character design, cartoonish doesn't relieve the design from being seen as bad especially when we are going for bipedalism
again, look at Ratchet, he has fine anatomy and proportions despite being cartoonish so it doesn't look distracting
it's as bad as people yelling about female birds and reptiles having chest
I really don't know what you're getting at, and you seem to be arguing from the position that it's badness is self evident, which it isn't. Your point on female chests is especially confusing--are you arguing that bringing up anatomy is valid or invalid?
I'm trying to work out the logic on show here. Why would Sakurai mentioning or not the Mii costumes have any bearing on K Rool?Sakurai's weekly Famitsu column doesn't mention the Mii Fighter costumes at all, for those of you who are still adamant that K. Rool has been "deconfirmed".
Yeah, I'm pretty confused too.I'm trying to work out the logic on show here. Why would Sakurai mentioning or not the Mii costumes have any bearing on K Rool?
My point is that being "cartoonish" doesn't automatically mean a design with certain tattletales is fine, and that using it as a defense is moot.
But whether or not Falco has feet that are big enough for a bird of his proportion doesn't matter, does it? He's an anthropomorphized bird, for all we know his feet aren't talons but plantigrade/human-styled (just like many anthropomorphized cartoon animals have - Mickey Mouse's feet are like that, for instance).
In fact, the only evidence we have so far for the artistic interpretation of feet in the Star Fox universe is Krystal, whose feet are clearly plantigrade, but with claws. No paws here.
I'm trying to work out the logic on show here. Why would Sakurai mentioning or not the Mii costumes have any bearing on K Rool?
Sakurai's Famitsu columns tend to be very focused, and the theme of this week's column is extra content in games. It's not a Smash Bros. column. There are zero reasons why K. Rool would have been mentioned in any context. He might talk about the Mii costumes in another week or so if he feels like dedicating a column to the third wave of DLC.Surely he would have said something if this was the end of the road for K. Rool.
He made a column for Chrom right after his deconfirm tho. Unless he's just being biased against DK characters again, he would probably explain why he didn't add such a major ballot request if he was actually deconfirmed. He's so defensive in his column as is so why not use the platform of his column to justify what would be a dumb decision on his part? Instead, silence.
People saw both of those and basically up until the ESRB revealed anything (well Ice Climbers not returning was confirmed a bit earlier than that was it not?) assumed both were coming, especially with one being a vet and another one being rumoured. It's an example were predictions were dashed despite "credible" evidence and should be taken as a lesson in how not to hype yourself up over something.Isn't that more a case of that stuff being in Smash Run because Ice Climbers and a RH rep were cut mid-development and not 'just because'?
Sorta off this tangent, but was Black Knight talked about all that much as a possible character for Smash 4? I remember him cropping up a ton as a FE villain rep after Ike was revealed, but I figured he was like Midna where by Smash 4 even if they had a fanbase nobody seriously considered them as a new character.
Black Knight's costume is really an oddballl. The rest of the costumes, except the generic ones, are all pretty obvious ballot leaders, or at least ones that did decent in the ballot.
And then there's the Black Knight with an entirely new hat system as well. Only Mii hat in the game that 100% replaces the Mii's head. Which is interesting and I hope it's used more in the future, especially so costumes stop looking like the Mii skinned the character and wears its pelt as a trophy. So either someone at Namco just really like Path of Radiance, or Black Knight actually got some votes.
And maybe they'll come to their senses and realize a red land master is the stupidest Final Smash that has ever existed.
We both know that's impossible - if they didn't give Roy or Dr. Mario new Final Smashes when they weren't bound by the previous game's precedent, Wolf won't become the first veteran to get theirs decloned.
I don't think the costumes were from ballot results. Unless Lloyd and Chrom and Black Knight were just loooooooved in Japan, they seem to just have been part of a costume plan meant to give stuff to a bunch of different series. Are generic bears and hoodies supposed to be "fan-service" from the ballot too?
And if you think about it K. Rool is the only real major DK character who stands on two feet like the Mii's. And the only one with a new model and textures since the Black Knight has a trophy and those others have other roles in the game already. Like it or not he's a special case here.
K. Rool costume could have been before the ballot. He was one of the highest wants all through the game and the interim between release and ballot.
We both know that's impossible - if they didn't give Roy or Dr. Mario new Final Smashes when they weren't bound by the previous game's precedent, Wolf won't become the first veteran to get theirs decloned.
That model is taken from Barrel Blast, like Lanky's was. It's not a new model. It's a new pose, but so was Lanky's.Now here's a funny thing: I could also apply the same logic you are doing with K. Rool's Mii costume to Dixie: Look at her trophy in the new Smash game.
This is, in fact, an entirely new model in a pose that has never been used before. Google it yourself, if you don't believe me.
Now, I was being mocked about this before for bringing this up as a hint that Dixie might've been at least planned to be playable, but here's the question I'll pose to you, UglyRareCharacter:
Would Sakurai and his team have gone through the process of making an entirely new model for Dixie Kong if they could've just nicked the Tropical Freeze model, and all that just for a trophy?
Think about it.
Roy's Final Smash is 100% unique. It works nothing like Marth's, and is more similar to Meta-Knight's.
That model is taken from Barrel Blast, like Lanky's was. It's not a new model. It's a new pose, but so was Lanky's.
K. Rool costume could have been before the ballot. Although no one will think that on this site where the people whining about how he's ugly and fat said 'hahaha nobody cares about him' before the ballot and everyone kind of passively accepted that as fact and that Dixie was the shoo in.
He was one of the highest wants all through the game and the interim between release and ballot. Doesn't make it for sure this wasn't a consolation but this isn't something to say with certainty either way, as much as people want to close the book on the Rool hype train so their favs can shine instead.
Excellent post. This is sort of what Chris Pranger from the Treehouse was saying; loud voices on the Internet do not represent nearly as big of an audience as they think they do.We've already had a rather large and lengthy discussion about how we don't really have any clue who was the highest voted as Nintendo hasn't released the numbers and any outside data gathering will be both unreliable and not necessarily representative of what Nintendo has actually received, which is the only data that truly matters.
If I wanted to I could easily use the Famitsu polls to justify claims of Hatsune Miku being a hugely demanded character and even show that K.Rool didn't make the top selection, but I don't because that's only the famitsu readers and heck knows what percentage of them are even represented in the actual Nintendo Ballot: they could infact be a small number because who knows how many went on to actually vote in the ballot itself or it could be a large one considering it's one of the top gaming publications in Japan.
Point is, I have enough wits about me not to wave some poll around as if it's cast iron proof of whatever I want it to be, because none of them are. At best they're an interesting piece of data, at worst a flawed foundation to build an argument on. This is the reason you won't see me reference any other polls than the official Capcom ones when talking about streetfighter, because if I wanted to I could easily contrast the data the company actually collected and used with useless ones from Gamefaqs, eventhubs, random sites or the like, but it wouldn't make them any more true.
This is the problem I have with the internet sometimes: it's too easy for it to become an echo chamber allowing you to hear what you want to hear and it becomes simple for you to surround yourself with like-minded individuals who share a view that may actually be a minority, creating the illusion you're part of the majority. This is especially true with functions like ignore or the like, which I stubbornly refuse to use because I like to see as clearly as possible rather than blinkering myself.
Don't fall into the trap of thinking any of us are the majority, this isn't the candy crush topic: we're all a minority here