Doom85
Member
PG-13
I dunno, if they say they intend to keep Deadpool 3 at R, there's no reason to automatically assume Blade will be PG-13.
PG-13
How in the world is the DC side more respectable? They are still working their shit out. Wonder Woman was great with a shit ending. Shazam and Aquaman were both good but have tonal problems and no where near the level of Infinity War, Winter Soldier, Far From Home, Endgame, Ragnarok or Civil War.
I don't believe them. There are some rumors about Marvel re-introducing Deadpool in the next Spider Man movie.I dunno, if they say they intend to keep Deadpool 3 at R, there's no reason to automatically assume Blade will be PG-13.
I don't believe them. There are some rumors about Marvel re-introducing Deadpool in the next Spider Man movie.
At least the DC movies feel like they're being done with some level of honesty, there's a soul in them. Jason Momoa and Zachary Levi felt like good choices for their roles and the movies while not being perfect at least didn't suck monster balls like Captain Marvel or Ragnarok. More than anything, both felt fresh, they felt unique unlike the Marvel movies which feel like you're watching the same shit forever. The last truly good Marvel movie was Guardian 2, everything after it is full on corporation zombie mode, it feels painfully done by a committee to lead suckers into the movies. It's just like the Star Wars movie. Disney is a cancer.
Think about it this way, DC just picked absolutely based Robert Pattinson to play Batman. Marvel thinks Natalie Portman should be Thor. I rest my case.
Marvel thinks Natalie Portman should be Thor. I rest my case.
I wouldnt expect bloody and violent. I'd expect something trying to emulate Black Panther so they can get paid $$$.Blade better by bloody and violent.
Hurry up with Spider-Man 3 as well please.
Edit: I hope they do Taskmaster right as well!
Literally the only people that think that are a niche group of internet social justice warriors. Relax it’s not that serious. They are comic book movies.Where did I say I was getting upset about "SJW" shit? I said I didn't like that disliking the movies for legitimate reasons got you labeled as racist or sexist.
Literally the only people that think that are a niche group of internet social justice warriors. Relax it’s not that serious. They are comic book movies.
If you didn’t like Ragnarok I feel bad for you son. Pretty much everyone critics and audiences agree that Rag is one of the best marvel movies to date and one of the best movies to come out that year.At least the DC movies feel like they're being done with some level of honesty, there's a soul in them. Jason Momoa and Zachary Levi felt like good choices for their roles and the movies, while not perfect, at least didn't suck monster balls like Captain Marvel or Ragnarok. More than anything, both felt fresh, they felt unique unlike the Marvel movies which feel like you're watching the same shit forever. The last truly good Marvel movie was Guardians 2, everything after it is full on corporation zombie mode, it feels painfully done by a committee to lead suckers into the movies. It's just like the Star Wars movie. Disney is a cancer.
Think about it this way, DC just picked absolutely based Robert Pattinson to play Batman. Marvel thinks Natalie Portman should be Thor. I rest my case.
Literally the only people that think that are a niche group of internet social justice warriors. Relax it’s not that serious. They are comic book movies.
At least the DC movies feel like they're being done with some level of honesty, there's a soul in them. Jason Momoa and Zachary Levi felt like good choices for their roles and the movies, while not perfect, at least didn't suck monster balls like Captain Marvel or Ragnarok. More than anything, both felt fresh, they felt unique unlike the Marvel movies which feel like you're watching the same shit forever. The last truly good Marvel movie was Guardians 2, everything after it is full on corporation zombie mode, it feels painfully done by a committee to lead suckers into the movies. It's just like the Star Wars movie. Disney is a cancer.
Think about it this way, DC just picked absolutely based Robert Pattinson to play Batman. Marvel thinks Natalie Portman should be Thor. I rest my case.
I realized this after watching The Incredibles 2. It isn't just the MCU, but almost every franchise.Sorry but Infinity War + Endgame already gave us the most epic story. I can't muster the hype for future MCU films.
It doesn't help that the final act of Endgame showed me hints of: 'Hey, the future of this franchise is not for you"
I realized this after watching The Incredibles 2. It isn't just the MCU, but almost every franchise.
Case in point:
This isn't the cast I would expect for a sci-fi space epic (The Eternals)
I realized this after watching The Incredibles 2. It isn't just the MCU, but almost every franchise.
Case in point:
This isn't the cast I would expect for a sci-fi space epic (The Eternals)
Looks legit to me.I realized this after watching The Incredibles 2. It isn't just the MCU, but almost every franchise.
Case in point:
This isn't the cast I would expect for a sci-fi space epic (The Eternals)
It looks like the cast of a sitcom. Or those cheap CW superhero shows. Compare to the cast of the first Avatar, for example.Alright, I guess that's just your way of looking at it, because I wouldn't look at any actor or actress and think, "why are they in a sci-fi epic?", it's not a genre that exactly demands specific types of actors and actresses (and really, the only genre that would do that that I can think of historical). If it's a sci-fi military story, then sure the kid is out of place, but beyond that I don't see why any of this cast don't fit with the genre.
Yes but Guardians is a comedy.Because this guy
certainly looks like he would fit in a sci-fi... What the fuck are you even saying? How can you even imagine an actor being able to play or not in a sci-fi? Are you some kind of inhuman? Because it is impossible to factually state "x actor does not fit in a sci-fi". Stop being ridiculous.
Yes but Guardians is a comedy.
If in the long run i get ghost rider (dan ketch) and a midnight sons movie the. Fuck yes even pg13.
Holy shit i like the guy from silicon valley makes me want to watch it now.I realized this after watching The Incredibles 2. It isn't just the MCU, but almost every franchise.
Case in point:
This isn't the cast I would expect for a sci-fi space epic (The Eternals)
I realized this after watching The Incredibles 2. It isn't just the MCU, but almost every franchise.
Case in point:
This isn't the cast I would expect for a sci-fi space epic (The Eternals)
Wait, so Thor is his title and not his name?
So what's his name when other people are Thor?
Odinson.
If you didn’t like Ragnarok I feel bad for you son. Pretty much everyone critics and audiences agree that Rag is one of the best marvel movies to date and one of the best movies to come out that year.
I mean, I thought Portman gave an alright performance in Thor 1 and 2, and she did incredible in Black Swan and Annihilation. But you do you.
My issue with DC is I dunno what’s going on with their continuity.
Is the Justice League still a thing? Who is Superman? What’s going on with Superman, in general, in this universe now? Is The Batman it’s own side universe, like Joker? What’s connected, what isn’t? Where is it all going?
I am excited for a Flash movie and Aquaman/Shazam/WW are all good movies that I look forward to sequels of, don’t get me wrong.
Also, in fairness, Lady Thor is pretty relevant from the pretty popular The Mighty Thor run. Portman will need some sort of practical effect to pull off the look as Thor, IMO, but it could work.
Sorry to say, but Aquaman and Shazam! are way more "corporate" than the MCU films. DC were doing their own thing with Man of Steel, and Batman V Superman, they felt like Zack Snyder films..
The corporate bigwigs at the top felt that the dark tone wasn't working and so with Wonder Woman onward they started injecting humor to be more like the MCU films. The humor is entirely forced in Aquaman and most jokes don't land. Shazam! stepped it up with the jokes because it was actually funny. DC is literally run by Warner corporate and they even keep interfering with the production of their own films.
The MCU is run by people who are absolutely passionate about Marvel comics. Previously corporate interfered with Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World and Age of Ultron but phase 3 has not had corporate interference.
Ant-Man + Ant-man and the Wasp feel like a Peyton Reed film.
Winter Soldier, Civil War, Infinity War and Endgame all feel like Russo Bros films.
GotG 1 and 2 feel like James Gun films but less vulgar and "more mature".
Ragnarok feels like a Taika Waititi film.
Black Panther feels like a Ryan Coogler film.
The films are made by the creatives, Kein Feige lets them breath.
Are you sure? Because that would suck big time.It'll be PG13.
I thought Odinson was his title.
In the comics when Jane got th hammer and the power of Thor, he was referred to as Odinson. Beyond that I'm not sure, I don't think too much thought was put into it beyond, "Hey let's have a female Thor!"
I wonder how long MCU can keep going on at this height. Black Widow, Doctor Strange 2, Wanda Vision TV, Hawkeye TV and so on sounds unappealing to me. Do not see the point of that at all.
I am excited for Thor Love and Thunder and Blade. Blade could be really good. Ali was amazing in Moonlight, and with the right director it could be a fantastic movie. I loved Blade 1 and 2.
Different things appeal to different people I guess.I wonder how long MCU can keep going on at this height. Black Widow, Doctor Strange 2, Wanda Vision TV, Hawkeye TV and so on sounds unappealing to me. Do not see the point of that at all.
I am excited for Thor Love and Thunder and Blade. Blade could be really good. Ali was amazing in Moonlight, and with the right director it could be a fantastic movie. I loved Blade 1 and 2.
There is an entire army of Thor's that all have mjolnirs.Wait, so Thor is his title and not his name?
So what's his name when other people are Thor?
There is an entire army of Thor's that all have mjolnirs.
I saw this coming from a mile away with Thor. People argued with me that this(portman the next Thor) wasn't going to happen. LOOKS LIKE I WON. Points for my e-peen.
Disappointed that the what ifs are going to be animated. I mean I think it is cool that they are going to happen though.
Excited for CottonMouth getting his come up as Blade. The dude is a fantastic actor.
Seems like we are going deep into the more recent lore of Marvel as opposed to sticking to the old. Not a fan of seeing Jolie as part of the Eternals(but I digress since it is just a personal thing). Though the cast looks like American politics one o one(diversity was a requirement clearly).
Count me in for Doctor Strange , Loki , Falcon and the winter soldier(he is cap now, don't call him Falcon anymore pls), and shang chi
As for the diversity... I mean duh. It is the same idea as someone buying a yellow mustang. You do it for the attention. The car can still be great but it is obvious to everyone and was obviously purchased with that intent. Don't sleep on stuber, he was fine in the movie.Diversity being a key point for Eternals was pretty expected since they were making it a point to cast a gay lead from the beginning. It is a great cast aside from the stuber guy and Jolie so as long as they don't rewrite Ikaris to be guy it should be fine.
Funny thing about Thor was I was resigned to Valkyrie taking over which would have sucked pretty bad by itself but shoehorning Portman into it, as much I love her as an actress, is just even more ridiculous considering how she dropped off the face of the earth. It's crazy how much the MCU hates the Thor character now. I wouldn't be surprised if Valkyrie and Foster are the ones actually hooking up in the new movie.