Yeah, but the scammer can keep the PS4 anyways and send back a dildo with a note that says "Get Fucked".
In the end, the scammer will win if he really wants to.
And if he doesn't win today he'll just scam someone else.
Yeah, but the scammer can keep the PS4 anyways and send back a dildo with a note that says "Get Fucked".
In the end, the scammer will win if he really wants to.
That's my thought as well... No real proof was shown that the serial number in question was indeed sent to the buyer. I hope it works out for you OP!
And if he doesn't win today he'll just scam someone else.
Before telling the scammer you contacted Sony OP I'd ask him to confirm the serial.
has the seller replied?
The correspondence is hopefully enough to prove that his initial claim the device had been banned means it was not broken when received by buyer.
That's what I did, so far I've only asked him if he has PS+ the other day, and earlier asking him to confirm the serial number.
I'm the seller, lol
Sony won't have the banned serial number attached to op's account. Scammer is up the creek.The buyer can simply say he didn't receive said device. He can say he received this device (a banned machine). Ebay will side with him as it's the responsibility of the seller to prove what they actually sent. The device discussed with the Sony rep could actually still be sat in the OP's home for all eBay knows. This isn't enough.
The console is banned online so it is partly working which is in turn no use to me. I would like a full refund
To reiterate that is not enough. EBAY will not go outside of their reach and speak to Sony/Amazon on your behalf to reach the truth. The burden of proof falls on you. You correspondence with Sony may be enough to scare off the buyer but won't help you with Ebay. You need both that and proof that the system in question is indeed the one you sent him with your Amazon receipt (including the serial).That's what I did, so far I've only asked him if he has PS+ the other day, and earlier asking him to confirm the serial number.
I'm the seller, lol
The buyer can simply say he didn't receive said device. He can say he received this device (a banned machine). Ebay will side with him as it's the responsibility of the seller to prove what they actually sent. The device discussed with the Sony rep could actually still be sat in the OP's home for all eBay knows. This isn't enough.
Sony won't have the banned serial number attached to op's account. Scammer is up the creek.
But there is correspondence between buyer and seller explicitly claiming the device received was banned, not broken or unreceived, no? And if proof that the device was in fact not banned, where is the opening for new argument from buyer?
Buying/selling on ebay is still a nightmare. I remember having to file a police report on a $400 purchase just to get my money back when I was sent an empty box. Guy even had a clean account with 400+ feedback. Just started scamming a bunch of people.
But there is correspondence between buyer and seller explicitly claiming the device received was banned, not broken or unreceived, no? And if proof that the device was in fact not banned, where is the opening for new argument from buyer?
You sure that seller's account wasn't just stolen? Seems more likely than an established seller making a heel turn.
Buying/selling on ebay is still a nightmare. I remember having to file a police report on a $400 purchase just to get my money back when I was sent an empty box. Guy even had a clean account with 400+ feedback. Just started scamming a bunch of people.
I am glad Sony worked with you and gave you the serial number...but as stated over and over in this thread..
If this guy really sticks with his story, you are still going to lose. There is no evidence that the ps4 you sent was the one your chat with Sony claimed. You have no proof outside your word that you sent him that particular ps4. So if this guy claims the ps4 you sent him was console banned, ebay is going to side with him. I would bet that even if you had a video of you packaging the ps4 with the serial number you would still lose, unless you filmed one unedited take of you packaging the console at the post office and handing it over to the mail person..,..and even then you would probably still lose.
At this point you better hope the guy trying the scam is a scam noob, and freaks out when you put him on the spot.
I'm saying the correspondence with Sony only proves the OP owns a PS4 with a certain serial that is not banned from PSN. It does not prove that that PS4 was sent to the buyer. He could have sent another banned PS4.
There is nothing that ties the serial number to the console Vashetti send. Hypothetically Vashetti could have send a bricked console and provide the serial number of a working one. It's his word against the buyers.
While I think you're goosed here due to lack of proof. It does raise an interesting point.
How do you prove what you sent? I'm thinking an officially stamped and dated confirmation from the postal officer that took the package from you confirming the serial number might be sufficient. Not sure if that sort of thing is done though.
That doesn't prove which PS4 was sent. eBay can just say he sent a banned PS4 instead of the one he promised to send.
This is forgot what it's called but pay extra for the safety. They have to sign it and you can set special provisions like does item Serial match this #? They have to sign they agree to get the item. Then you have proof that they received it and signed that the item they got is what you said it was. You'll get a confirmation to you the moment it's signed sent to email or phone however you like. It's great!While I think you're goosed here due to lack of proof. It does raise an interesting point.
How do you prove what you sent? I'm thinking an officially stamped and dated confirmation from the postal officer that took the package from you confirming the serial number might be sufficient. Not sure if that sort of thing is done though.
Has he replied yet?That's what I did, so far I've only asked him if he has PS+ the other day, and earlier asking him to confirm the serial number.
I'm the seller, lol
How so? You package it up and take it to the post office. You ask the clerk to confirm on paper the serial of the package you are sending. Ask them to officially stamp it and date it along with the tracking info. That is an official statement of fact from the authorised courier.
That is the only way you can get proof with a witness that what you said you sent is in fact what you sent.
Has he replied yet?
Good grief, my local postal workers will barely do the bare minimum they are paid to do, and there's a line of 20 people behind me when I ship something. No way they do this.
Nothing.
The correspondence is hopefully enough to prove that his initial claim the device had been banned means it was not broken when received by buyer.
OP is the email you use with ebay the same as the one you use with PSN?
You could ask Sony to confirm that there's never been a serial number with that ID (if the buyer provides one) tied with your account and assuming it's the same email as the one you use on ebay, ebay might at least look on you favourably, even though it's not definitive proof.
Yup, pretty much same email for everything.
And good idea, if he provides another serial, I may contact Sony again just to get written evidence on their end that that serial has never been attached to my account.
I feel bad to continually be the "but what if?" guy. But I have multiple XBL and PSN accounts.
I know, I'm just trying to amount as much shit as possible in the hope he'll give up and back off.
This. No just a moral call. If I lost my money hell just have to try and sell off a paper weight in the same ecosystem that favors the buyer.So if the buyer wins, can OP ask Sony to ban the console since it was technically stolen?
Don't know if this has been discussed, but could it be possible that the buyer is telling the truth? Like he could be IP banned but mistaking it as a console ban. And it could be the case that he has a dynamic IP and just got assigned a previously banned one this month by his ISP.
Not trying to assemble a "defense force" but I'm genuinely curious. That's all.
If you read the screenshots I posted, Sony state the console is online, he's been using it.