Sony’s confidence in PlayStation is well-placed - GamesIndustry.biz

Flawless explanation. The Playstation division has literally nothing to fear, there's no other high performance box in the market right now able to play absolutely all games other than PS5, when you get this entrenched with your value proposition it's hard to ever see it taken away from you.
It's a flawed explanation. The fact that they have been so successful is not a guarantee that they will continue to be successful. A great deal of that success is the result of third parties being successful and if companies like EA and Ubisoft experience a sharp decline in sales it could turn disastrous. Sony couldn't run the PlayStation business as it runs today without third party revenue carrying most of the financial burden. Thats an insecure position that Sony is keenly aware of.

That said, the business is currently healthy and PlayStation is the de facto place to play a lot of the biggest console games. That gives them buffer to get first party revenue back on track, which they said that they are working to do. Albeit by reducing focus on the box and increasing focus on content.
 
I agree. But those were shit games even without the woke crap. We are talking ND gameplay.
I don't know about Dustborn or Dragon Age because I havent played them, but games like Concord, Destruction All Stars or Forspoken did many things right and some cases at the top level, weren't crap.

With way more appealing character designs and stories they would have worked way better and wouldn't have received most of the shit they got. They all also had stuff to improve in the gameplay side but IMO were less important issues.

I think in characters where playable characters are very important, like in hero shooters, fighting games or narrative focused games it is key to make very cool characters, way more than it seems. Specially when the game monetization depends in a big way on people buying these characters individually or skin for them.

As an example, in Street Fighter the most played characters are the good looking, balanced/intermediate/average regarding speed or lenght or physical appearance guys (like Ryu, Ken, etc) plus the hot chicks. And the best selling skins are bikinis for the hot chicks. The ugly weirdos are the less played ones and the ones for who the people buy less stuff.

Meaning, they better stop putting androginous weirdos as Marathon characters and put instead more attractive, appealing and cool femenine -clearly- females and badass jacked/fit/gigachad -clearly- males, with at least half of them being white-ish.
 
Last edited:
I have a dang good PC so I'm having a hard time justifying my PS5 Pro at this rate. I could just wait for the ports on PC really. I was certain there would be a showcase this year that would give me an idea of what the PS5 roadmap looks like for the next couple of years, but that, once again, never happened. Funny that I've been having the same arguments about this shit for what.....three years now? That's the primary reason I don't argue with folks about it any more. If others are happy with PS5 then more power to them. Opinions.
It's opinions yeah, but if you like Sony's first party games of the past then it's understandable, there isn't much out there right now.

Saros should be awesome though, I loved Returnal. Just do the same thing and give me unlimited save rooms and metroidvania backtracking and gear based progression and it'll be a 11/10!
And Intergalactic, annoying main character perhaps but I love sci-fi and I could endure "Sarah disliked that!" so I'm pretty sure I can handle it, should be spectacular.

But that's 2026, or later we'll see. And as you say if you have a PC you could wait for ports, will just get a game with all the post-release patches in place.

Essentially took Microsoft 5 years to get things going so it hasn't been better elsewhere at least. Guess it's an industry problem. Too long dev times. Too few games in development.
 
Last edited:
If I had a dollar for every single time Sony gaf used Astro bot to defend their ps5 purchase I'd be a rich man

I agree that PS isn't for me - this generation has been beyond pathetic. This is coming from someone who owned ps1-4 too.

you all are a special breed. Your refusal to confront reality is almost admirable
For a guy who argues like a flat-Earther, you're incredibly arrogant and overbearing.

Astrobot is a GOTY, a high score, and a declared success by the game's creator. That's a relevant argument; your opinion isn't.

That's consensus. Your opinion about the game isn't.

Just as the Earth is round, a scientific consensus, Astrobot is a very relevant game because it's a consensus of criticism and awards.

Paraphrasing, to define who you are: The internet gave a voice to idiots (I'm sure you know who said that, since you call yourself intellectual elite, and I'm sure that vaccines aren't a matter of "faith," but of science).
 
For a guy who argues like a flat-Earther, you're incredibly arrogant and overbearing.

Astrobot is a GOTY, a high score, and a declared success by the game's creator. That's a relevant argument; your opinion isn't.

That's consensus. Your opinion about the game isn't.

Just as the Earth is round, a scientific consensus, Astrobot is a very relevant game because it's a consensus of criticism and awards.

Paraphrasing, to define who you are: The internet gave a voice to idiots (I'm sure you know who said that, since you call yourself intellectual elite, and I'm sure that vaccines aren't a matter of "faith," but of science).
My whole point is that desperate Sony fanboys need to cling to Astro Bot as everything else tumbles and collapses around them when it comes to Sony—it's their last shiny thing to hold up while ignoring the bigger problems. I'm not even criticizing Astro bot in this thread.

Your post continues to prove my point btw

And fucking lol and making parallels to flat earth and vaccines. It's just video games dude, chill
 
Last edited:
It's opinions yeah, but if you like Sony's first party games of the past then it's understandable, there isn't much out there right now.

Saros should be awesome though, I loved Returnal. Just do the same thing and give me unlimited save rooms and metroidvania backtracking and gear based progression and it'll be a 11/10!
And Intergalactic, annoying main character perhaps but I love sci-fi and I could endure "Sarah disliked that!" so I'm pretty sure I can handle it, should be spectacular.

But that's 2026, or later we'll see. And as you say if you have a PC you could wait for ports, will just get a game will all the post-release patches in place.

Essentially took Microsoft 5 years to get things going so it hasn't been better elsewhere at least. Guess it's an industry problem. Too long dev times. Too few games in development.

Returnal wasn't my thing, but lots of folks love it. I'm a big Naughty Dog fan so Intergalactic is a big one for me. If I knew for certain that was coming in 2026 then I'd definitely hold out.

Yeah....Microsoft is cranking out the titles. Some better than others, but the quantity is there. This gen, Sony spent their money mostly on live service (Bungie, Firewalk, Haven), ports (Nixxes) and remakes/remasters (Bluepoint). Housemarque is the only one that really brings the single players folks expect from PlayStation. So it isn't just about dev times. It is the mindset of those running PlayStation. Again....my opinion.
 
I think most can admit the lull in first party for the past two years, but if we're talking the future then their studios will be back to releasing games again very soon, similar to what occurred with the PS3.
 
This board is really iconera 2.0

No Way Kg GIF by SHOWTIME Sports
 
Last edited:
It's a flawed explanation. The fact that they have been so successful is not a guarantee that they will continue to be successful. A great deal of that success is the result of third parties being successful and if companies like EA and Ubisoft experience a sharp decline in sales it could turn disastrous. Sony couldn't run the PlayStation business as it runs today without third party revenue carrying most of the financial burden. Thats an insecure position that Sony is keenly aware of.

That said, the business is currently healthy and PlayStation is the de facto place to play a lot of the biggest console games. That gives them buffer to get first party revenue back on track, which they said that they are working to do. Albeit by reducing focus on the box and increasing focus on content.
They will remain successful as long as they remain the defacto platform, it's as simple as it gets really. There is only one game industry and they are essentially the gateway to access it, this isn't changing anytime soon even deep into PS6, anyone can tell you that and deduct the rest.
 
Last edited:
I'm over Playstation to be honest. Really disappointed in their 1st party output since the PS4 days to be honest. They don't really seem to wanna take risks anymore. Even the games they are investing in that aren't 1st party really don't seem to change the game anymore. I miss the Playstation that took risks like Wipeout, PaRappa the Rapper, Sly Racoon and not the Playstation that thinks Marvel is the way forward. The only recent game that took that chance was Returnal (and it's still one of the best current gen games around). But I need to see more of that. Seems like spending massive money means the risk to release weird games just isn't around much anymore...
 
I'm over Playstation to be honest. Really disappointed in their 1st party output since the PS4 days to be honest. They don't really seem to wanna take risks anymore. Even the games they are investing in that aren't 1st party really don't seem to change the game anymore. I miss the Playstation that took risks like Wipeout, PaRappa the Rapper, Sly Racoon and not the Playstation that thinks Marvel is the way forward. The only recent game that took that chance was Returnal (and it's still one of the best current gen games around). But I need to see more of that. Seems like spending massive money means the risk to release weird games just isn't around much anymore...
Ratchet and clank rift apart was dope at least
 
I mostly agree.
Sony has benefited greatly from Xbox continuously fucking up because they are basically the default home console now. Releasing their games on PC hasn't cannibalized their sales because, unlike what the GAF bubble thinks, the main appeal of the system isn't first party exclusives but the fact it's a relatively cheap box that plays the vast majority of big releases, requires minimum tinkering and is well optimized to be used on your TV with just a controller out of the box.
The Sony and Nintendo strategies are quite different in that way, because a Switch without Nintendo games is basically worthless but a ps5 without Sony games would probably still be compelling to many people who just want to play COD, Fortnite, FIFA/Madden, GTA, Battlefield, Assassins Creed, Wukong, etc.

I just think this strategy might be risky in the long run because it depends on the status quo of the industry staying the same, which it might, but it might also change in unexpected ways, in which case having the main appeal of your platform depending on third party software isn't ideal. In that way I think the Nintendo approach is a bit safer as a long term plan, because the success of their platform doesn't depend on them being the cheap/easy place to play third party games.
Sony's advantage isn't just having a device that's easy to use and relatively cheap. Their real edge is that the PlayStation brand is huge—really huge. People buy a PlayStation for the same reason they buy an iPhone: it's a device that's already cemented in people's minds as the video game console.

The fact that Sony numbers its consoles as PS1, PS2, PS3, etc., also gives them a marketing edge. Anyone choosing between a PS5 and a PS6 will immediately know the PS6 is the newer, better one. It's simple, practical, and that's how products should be. You can bet thousands of people have already been confused about the difference between a Series S and a Series X.

Five years ago, at the start of this generation, people said Microsoft had a powerful play with the Series S + Game Pass combo, since it would be the perfect console for people who only play COD, FIFA, GTA V, and so on. And the theory does make sense—on paper. But in practice, it works differently.

Most people here have no idea how the market actually works.
 
Returnal wasn't my thing, but lots of folks love it. I'm a big Naughty Dog fan so Intergalactic is a big one for me. If I knew for certain that was coming in 2026 then I'd definitely hold out.

Yeah....Microsoft is cranking out the titles. Some better than others, but the quantity is there. This gen, Sony spent their money mostly on live service (Bungie, Firewalk, Haven), ports (Nixxes) and remakes/remasters (Bluepoint). Housemarque is the only one that really brings the single players folks expect from PlayStation. So it isn't just about dev times. It is the mindset of those running PlayStation. Again....my opinion.
Returnal using the cloud save cheat so you had one save file was pure fire! 🔥

You should give it another go. It's so close to a 3rd person Metroid that there are mods on PC replacing Selene with Samus, in all her suit variations! lol
Just a bummer you can't do a character swap during cut scenes, otherwise I would mod out the title screen too so it says Metroid Returnal.

Regarding Microsoft, yeah they've been on fire basically since last autumn, so roughly a year. I must've played nearly 10 big games since then.
Maybe MS wanted the games out before the initial GTA release date?
And Sony thought they would be fine with just GTA? Then GTA got delayed and here we are?
🤔
 
Returnal using the cloud save cheat so you had one save file was pure fire! 🔥

You should give it another go. It's so close to a 3rd person Metroid that there are mods on PC replacing Selene with Samus, in all her suit variations! lol
Just a bummer you can't do a character swap during cut scenes, otherwise I would mod out the title screen too so it says Metroid Returnal.

Regarding Microsoft, yeah they've been on fire basically since last autumn, so roughly a year. I must've played nearly 10 big games since then.
Maybe MS wanted the games out before the initial GTA release date?
And Sony thought they would be fine with just GTA? Then GTA got delayed and here we are?
🤔
I do think the GTA delay hugely fucked them

Even more reason why I have zero interest in Sony: their biggest current draw is a game I have zero interest in

Meanwhile Nintendo just released dkb which is one of the best games I've ever played in my entire life
 
I do think the GTA delay hugely fucked them

Even more reason why I have zero interest in Sony: their biggest current draw is a game I have zero interest in

Meanwhile Nintendo just released dkb which is one of the best games I've ever played in my entire life
Yeah GTA could honestly be the culprit. If Sony banked too much on it and told devs that they had another year for their games because everybody will just play GTA anyway so no point wasting a release in 2025.

And MS told their devs that they had to rush the releases so they were out first half of 2025. And now they're in the back waters with less game late 2025 instead.

I agree on DKB. It's mostly my youngest one that's playing it here at the moment but I think I'm at 400 or thereabout. It's quite amazing really that it's not breaking apart with all that freedom!
 
Top Bottom