I don't think it is unless you believe it's going to impact game design but i don'tWhy would this be a negative? It allows more compatibility for drives.
Last edited:
I don't think it is unless you believe it's going to impact game design but i don'tWhy would this be a negative? It allows more compatibility for drives.
Hey, I was one of those hoping for 5GB/s. I'll take it. While some are sitting in here 'concerned' as to why it isnt 7GB/s, I'm just excited it can be cheaper.Interesting, also, that it is much lower than what Cerny initially said would be required.
Just ordered this one this morning. Cant wait to test it.This WD SN850 (without/with heatsink) will fit inside just fine. 7 GB/s read.
$120/$140 for 500 GB
$200/$250 for 1TB
$400/$430 for 2TB
5 year warranty.
Can always just add a 3rd party heatsink for $10 off Amazon if buying the naked model.
Seems like the best option.
WD_BLACK™ SN850 NVMe™ SSD PCIe® Gen4 for PC or Laptop | Western Digital | Western Digital Store
Long load times are obsolete with next-gen PCIe® Gen4 technology. Arm your system with RGB lighting, an optional heatsink model, and up to 2TB1 capacity.shop.westerndigital.com
They are allowing off the shelf drives.......I know you cant possibly think its lazy. C'mon.They can’t just give a list of some approved SSDs? Wow that’s lazy.
They can’t just give a list of some approved SSDs? Wow that’s lazy.
- Not all games are necessarily playable with the exact same performance provided by the PS5 console’s internal Ultra-High Speed SSD, even where the M.2 SSD device’s sequential read speed is faster than 5500MB/s.
That’s a slightly worrying disclaimer. So no matter what drive you buy potentially it will still perform worse than the internal? Or maybe it’s just for the beta?
That drive don't reach 5500MB/s in sequential read from what i see in tests.
I just remembered these posts. I'll still leave mine here but yeah....I guess 5GB/s isnt all you will need to know.Good catch. I was filtering in Newegg just on advertised peak speed. Sony will definitely need to publish a list of SSDs that have been tested before this comes out of beta.
We will find out in due courseWhat happens to the argument that games are being fundamentally designed for a 7GB/s ssd but then are able to run on something slower? I would love to see Rachet running off a slower SSD's to see the real-world difference.
I said it on the first teardown vid last yearNeeding a heatsink leads me to believe not much cooling is getting to the expansion Bay.
This one would work fine. Easiest is the 1 sided heatsinks. Anything under 8mm thick can go on top of a naked M.2 SSD and fit.I know I'm a bit slow, but I can't seem to find which would be the best heatsink that will fit over a drive like the SN850 and meet the requirements unless I buy some cheap super thin laptop size heat sink? I was going to buy https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B073RHHYCM/?tag=neogaf0e-20 , but, the dimensions for just the cooler are:
I'd be mounting this on an SN850 which, when I bought it, didn't have the built in heatsink option, and has L: 80.15mm W: 2.38mm X H: 22.15mm
I'm gathering, there's no way this will work out. If that's the case, I have no idea what heat sink to get.
That’s a slightly worrying disclaimer. So no matter what drive you buy potentially it will still perform worse than the internal? Or maybe it’s just for the beta?
It depends what Sony means by "performance" - if for example switching between the worlds in R&C takes a bit longer, who will really care? But if that means you can get into a scenario when you're rotating the camera and the textures or even entire assets aren't there, then that will be a serious issue.
Maybe the adoptionrate for qualified M2's is under par than Sony had hoped, and since storage capacity is getting more urgent by the minute, they landed on a solution that splits the internal SSD from the M2 and treats them as separate drives. The M2 will handle most games, but for some firstparty games (in a few years time) may require to be installed on the internal SSD to run, since they can always guarantee the throughput on that drive, but not for the M2 one.Yeah Cerny said we needed >5.5GB/s ones, and it seems Sony have backtracked on this requirement. I wonder what could be the reasons now?
This one would work fine. Easiest is the 1 sided heatsinks. Anything under 8mm thick can go on top of a naked M.2 SSD and fit.
Amazon.com: icepc M.2 PCI-E NVME 2280 SSD Graphene Coating Copper Heatsink,High Performance SSD Radiator with Thermal Pad for Laptop PC 2280 NGFF Solid State Disk Cooler(70x20x4mm): Computers & Accessories
Buy icepc M.2 PCI-E NVME 2280 SSD Graphene Coating Copper Heatsink, High Performance SSD Radiator with Thermal Pad for Laptop PC 2280 NGFF Solid State Disk Cooler(70x20x4mm): Heatsinks - Amazon.com ✓ FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchaseswww.amazon.com
Honestly best to let others buy and try before we do. Wait and see what fits.
Yeah, games that have 0 loading like Miles, Returnal or RE8 that has an actual screen and wait time on SX is no difference.They aren't. This was bs from the start. Games will be developed against sustained speed, not peak. I called this out last year. Optimal file transfer size plays a role, and heat plays a role in how well these ssds performs.
We have little proof that the max speed sony listed is even sustainable in a game and thus far, there has been a minimal difference in load speeds compared to XSX. All the talk of double speed never materialized. Even in the ps5 unreal demo it never approached peak ssd speed.
Sony saying "recommend speed" pretty much confirms it imo. You pay extra for speed with Nvme drives on pc. Same will occur here.
I have 2 TB in my xbox and its over half full of games. Extra space is needed on all consoles imo.
that’s a bad thing how? It’s not a raid setup.The phrasing of “ You can freely move games between the PS5 console’s storage, a connected USB extended storage device and the added M.2 SSD storage.” makes me worry that the OS won’t see the ssd as an extension of the console storage but as a separate unit.
Needing a heatsink leads me to believe not much cooling is getting to the expansion Bay.
I bet you are save with the minimum spec provided .. it streams to ram first before a game needs it.This is what I am thinking about, what happens if we get hitching and textures failing to load etc.
Needing a heatsink leads me to believe not much cooling is getting to the expansion Bay.
Unlike the rabid fanboys thinking it ....needs..... a heat sink.Of course there isn’t. Only rabbid fanboys tried to convince themselves that there was any effective cooling getting there
They should have made the cover on the ssd slot the heatsink like some pc motherboards do, put your bare ssd in peel the plastic off the pre mounted thermal pad on the cover/heatsink plug it on and off to the races you go. Its harder for people to screw up that way.I said it on the first teardown vid last year
Sony nail the specs of a console but fail on the design on many levels….I’m keen to hear the feedback on the noise of the ps5 with the drive in
I think the 4 mm would work fine. A M.2 drive is less than 1 mm thick. Total space inside is over 11 mm, with 8 mm above the drive.Thanks! I saw that one and was debating whether to get it. Not sure whether to get the 2mm or 4mm pad version. I would guess the 2mm, but, not sure if both fit regardless. I'm assuming that either would fit based on the small dimensions.
I also agree about the try before buy. I'll wait and see if some beta tester information on it becomes available.
Unlike the rabid fanboys thinking it ....needs..... a heat sink.
I have yet to see anywhere that states it....needs....a heatsink.
Unlike the rabid fanboys thinking it ....needs..... a heat sink.
I have yet to see anywhere that states it....needs....a heatsink.
I'm sure digital foundry will have this video up super quick.They definitely ran into issues getting this working, which is why it's a year late and there's a disclaimer that it may not perform as well as the internal SSD, regardless of the speed of the external drive.
I'd like to see something that takes advantage of the SSD like Ratchet run on the M.2 slot and compare performance.
Yeah, back when they were first talking about this they said it needed to be 7 GB/s to make up for processing overhead. Was that an actual requirement and they've somehow found a way to utilize 3P drives the same speed as PS5's internal one with no performance penalty, or....?What happens to the argument that games are being fundamentally designed for a 7GB/s ssd but then are able to run on something slower? I would love to see Rachet running off a slower SSD's to see the real-world difference.
But Sony does say this:
- Not all games are necessarily playable with the exact same performance provided by the PS5 console’s internal Ultra-High Speed SSD, even where the M.2 SSD device’s sequential read speed is faster than 5500MB/s.
I think the 4 mm would work fine. A M.2 drive is less than 1 mm thick. Total space inside is over 11 mm, with 8 mm above the drive.
As Sony shows here, a M.2 drive naked is 0.8 mm thick. Then you can add up to 8 mm on top for a heatsink and it'll fit.
Thanks! I'm obviously mathematically challenged (and/or lazy .. maybe). Being it's below $20, I ordered it just so it's not out of stock come time to use it. I'm also "that guy" who can't wait patiently for things.
They would always have to put that disclaimer in there. There is always that chance that you buy a drive with specs listed on the package that aren't delivered in a real-world scenario (crap controller, etc.). It's normal for drives with near identical specs to have completely different performance profiles from each other under heavy load.
It depends what Sony means by "performance" - if for example switching between the worlds in R&C takes a bit longer, who will really care? But if that means you can get into a scenario when you're rotating the camera and the textures or even entire assets aren't there, then that will be a serious issue.
Uh, didn't they say you needed a 7 GB/s drive in order to make up for overhead? Why are they now saying the minimum is 5.5 GB/s instead?
Here's the catch though, that commercial drive has to be at least as fast as ours, games that rely on the speed of our SSD need to work flawlessly with M.2 drive.
We can hook up a drive with only two priority levels definitely but our custom I/O unit has to arbitrate the extra priorities rather than the M.2 drives flash controller and so the M.2 drive needs a little extra speed to take care of issues arising from the different approach.
With Sony now porting everything to PCs, it's imperative that they dont push the SSD requirements too much.Interesting, also, that it is much lower than what Cerny initially said would be required.
YupWith Sony now porting everything to PCs, it's imperative that they dont push the SSD requirements too much.
yupNow SSD will be scalper fodder
Yes, there was even a thread about this recently.Is Sony going release their own SSD? It would be nice to have a reference product on the market in term of compatibility and speed. This expansion should work as the internal storage otherwise the cost/benefit will be quite limited.
What other "cooling structure" are people going to use? Sony says you require one, like a heatsink. So sure they say you need a cooling structure and not a heatsink but I mean holy fucking semantics batman.