HeartlessNobody213
Member
Cap/Black Panther vs Iron Man/Spidey?
Would be interesting.
Would be interesting.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Spider-Man is Entering The Marvel Cinematic Universe
- Thread starter Colonel Nasty
- Start date
ULTRAAAAA COMBOOOOOOO
No Wolverine. Thanks a lot, Fox.
Fair enough : )
toys? idk
Bobby Roberts
Banned
Well, we know from the leaks that Marvel DID at one time have a version of Civil War with Spidey included. I gotta imagine they've been having someone in their anonymous writers' squad trying to blend the most recent drafts with that older one to find a way to make it work with both Peter and T'Challa.
but no, I don't think Civil War is going to be as much of a showcase for Black Panther as we thought it was when it first got announced.
The Artisan
Member
NotTheGuyYouKill
Member
Punisher is already under Marvel's umbrella.
lol, that'd be crazy.
Sibersk Esto
Banned
Yeah that's only if they choose that spidey, if not then it's all good. It's just a pipe dream after all. I do wish they would keep Garfield, but I know it won't happen though :/
Gambit 1138
Banned
Hugh Jackman wants to do it though
BronsonLee
Member
We'll likely find out what they get out of it as time goes on.
brandonh83
Banned
Hardly Webb's fault. They were competently directed movies and he got really good performances out of the actors.
superdeluxe
Member
Interesting thought, but I think its going to be Peter Parker.
Dragonborn
Member
They make sure the brand isn't tarnished, and improving the Spidey movies means raking in more dough for them too. Plus, Spidey in the Avengers? That's hundreds of millions more guaranteed. Besides, RDJ is getting older, they need someone to headline these film after he's out. Spidey is perfect for that.
The Artisan
Member
Mushroomer25
Member
...
Do we know for sure if this Spiderman would even be Parker?
If they wanted to really differentiate this from the ASM timeline, maybe get somebody who could never be mistaken for Garfield?
Maybe NOW is the time?
He's not just some low-rent network TV star. He's got wide appeal.
Do we know for sure if this Spiderman would even be Parker?
If they wanted to really differentiate this from the ASM timeline, maybe get somebody who could never be mistaken for Garfield?
Maybe NOW is the time?
He's not just some low-rent network TV star. He's got wide appeal.
I guess it is the best they could hope for since it looks like Sony has no plans of letting go of the franchise.
At least it opens up more opportunities within the MCU and drive those films to even higher grosses.
The Silver
Member
Avatar is DONE
ah yes, the old days when Iron Man was just some C-list punk who cameo'd in Spiderman cartoons, how times have changes.
D
Deleted member 10571
Unconfirmed Member
Completely agree with you. I hope they decide for Garfield in the end, but as long as it's not Tobey Maguire I'll be fine.
Ninja Scooter
Member
Danny Glover as Spiderman?
NotTheGuyYouKill
Member
No X-Men! Please.
I dislike them.
I dislike them.
keisuke999
Member
...
Do we know for sure if this Spiderman would even be Parker?
If they wanted to really differentiate this from the ASM timeline, maybe get somebody who could never be mistaken for Garfield?
Maybe NOW is the time?
He's not just some low-rent network TV star. He's got wide appeal.
YES YES YES
Secret Character
Member
Well, Spider-Man will be showing up in just about as many mainline MCU productions as possible now. Marvel still gets the money from those films and having the most marketable Marvel character on scene will do nothing but boost sales.
They can kill off expensive contracts from the Avengers (Robert Downey Jr.), and invest in a younger and cheaper Spiderverse cast. Leads a new generation and phase of Marvel heroes.
...
Do we know for sure if this Spiderman would even be Parker?
If they wanted to really differentiate this from the ASM timeline, maybe get somebody who could never be mistaken for Garfield?
Maybe NOW is the time?
He's not just some low-rent network TV star. He's got wide appeal.
My man!
BronsonLee
Member
They specifically mention Peter Parker in the press release.
Xyrmellon
Member
It says Peter Parker in the press release.
Chezzymann
Member
This just made what was a bad day the best day of the month for me.
? how is the director not at fault when a film sucks this way? not saying he was solely responsible, but they werent well directed at all
they were both awful, and ASM2 might be the worst superhero film ive ever seen
also, im guessing he'll appear in cap 3 at this point
Nightengale
Member
Isn't it because Marvel makes bank that they don't have to "win" the whole package of the deal? Spidey is highly lucrative to Marvel even without movies, because those goddamn merchandising profits.
Even if they don't get the movie profits, by ensuring Sony doesn't fuck up Spidey's brand with shitty movies, and elevating Spidey via MCU integration, Spidey makes money for Marvel in the long run.
SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
Anton Yelchin's time to shine.
Yeah, seems like a lot to put at risk branding-wise, associating with craptastic Sony for something they can still snatch away if they get some momentum.
B_Spooky13
Member
All I want his Spider-man's story to be established.. I don't want another damn reboot.
Now all we need is to snag Hugh Jackman for Wolverine... Then when he meets Quicksilver in the MCU they have a one-liner and have them give a weird look at each other.
Now all we need is to snag Hugh Jackman for Wolverine... Then when he meets Quicksilver in the MCU they have a one-liner and have them give a weird look at each other.
ginger ninja
Banned
Next up: Civil war in 2 parts to accommodate the proper screen time for everyone.
NinjaTehFish
Banned
I think its an actual case of storytelling above all else (as opposed to just PR speak) and maybe a bit of brand protection.
AgentOtaku
Member
...
Do we know for sure if this Spiderman would even be Parker?
If they wanted to really differentiate this from the ASM timeline, maybe get somebody who could never be mistaken for Garfield?
Maybe NOW is the time?
He's not just some low-rent network TV star. He's got wide appeal.
I actually am down!
Ninja Scooter
Member
The fact that they made sure to remind everyone that SOny still owns and distributes and will make the money off the solo Spidey films is why I thought this would never happen though. I guess that's why it's confusing. Sony would basically be loaning Spidey out to Marvel to build him up in their MCU movies, and they hand him back to Sony (who still has creative control, or will Sony basically "hire" Feige?) and Sony reaps the rewards of having bigger solo Spiderman movies? Marvel has to be getting of cut of the solo stuff, no?
BadAss2961
Member
I'd watch this.
I suspect that's a bit of lip service. I can't imagine Sony not wanting some level of creative guidance for the new films, especially when they've done such a poor job of replicating the MCU magic themselves. So yes, they have "final say," but I doubt they'd deviate much from whatever Feige suggests.
Mushroomer25
Member
Good point, didn't catch this.
Unless the future of Parker's story is to die tragically in the opening act, and for this new Spiderman to step in...
I'm stretching, I know. But THE STARS ARE ALIGNING.
bananafactory
Banned
MEGATON OF THE MEGATON
ALL THE RUMOURS WERE REAL
BLESS YOU LATINOREVIEW
WE DID IT GUYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
ALL THE RUMOURS WERE REAL
BLESS YOU LATINOREVIEW
WE DID IT GUYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
brandonh83
Banned
For starters most people seemed to have issues with the writing/story. I don't think it was badly directed at all, in fact I thought the acting was great and I loved the look of it. That's why I said it was competently directed but I realize that some people let their hate flow over into every regard concerning elements of filmmaking.
a secret-boss
Banned
Marvel getting their icon back I think they might go with traditional Parker