MisterHero
Super Member
Iron Man had his own show and he was crossing over from it. It kinda stunk thoughah yes, the old days when Iron Man was just some C-list punk who cameo'd in Spiderman cartoons, how times have changes.
Iron Man had his own show and he was crossing over from it. It kinda stunk thoughah yes, the old days when Iron Man was just some C-list punk who cameo'd in Spiderman cartoons, how times have changes.
Linda Ge said:CONFIRMED: Andrew Garfield is NO LONGER Spider-Man. Someone new will be cast. First appearance in MCU, then solo film.
Please recast that loser Garfield ASAP. I don't care who at this point. Someone, ANYONE other than that smug-looking assclown!
? how is the director not at fault when a film sucks? not saying he was solely responsible
they were both awful, and ASM2 might be the worst superhero film ive ever seen
also, im guessing he'll appear in cap 3 at this point
The fact that they made sure to remind everyone that SOny still owns and distributes and will make the money off the solo Spidey films is why I thought this would never happen though. I guess that's why it's confusing. Sony would basically be loaning Spidey out to Marvel to build him up in their MCU movies, and they hand him back and Sony reaps the rewards of having bigger solo Spiderman movies? Marvel has to be getting of cut of the solo stuff, no?
If this wasn't posted already...
I edited my post, but Jake Gyllenhal would be my pick, though he's in his mid-30's. Would still work.
The fact that they made sure to remind everyone that SOny still owns and distributes and will make the money off the solo Spidey films is why I thought this would never happen though. I guess that's why it's confusing. Sony would basically be loaning Spidey out to Marvel to build him up in their MCU movies, and they hand him back and Sony reaps the rewards of having bigger solo Spiderman movies? Marvel has to be getting of cut of the solo stuff, no?
Completely agree with you. I hope they decide for Garfield in the end, but as long as it's not Tobey Maguire I'll be fine.
Good point, didn't catch this.
Unless the future of Parker's story is to die tragically in the opening act, and for this new Spiderman to step in...
I'm stretching, I know. But THE STARS ARE ALIGNING.
So what does Marvel get out of this? The potential added bonus of having Spiderman in MCU movies? Did they really need that? Those movies made bank without him.
I'm a bit confused by the arrangements.
Iron Man had his own show and he was crossing over from it. It kinda stunk though
ah yes, the old days when Iron Man was just some C-list punk who cameo'd in Spiderman cartoons, how times have changes.
Gwen livesIf nothing else, this makes the mess that was "The Amazing Spider-man 2" all the more worse.
Wasting an entire movie for set-up on something that will never come.
He could be a high school science teacher, or a leading scientist at a major laboratory, or something!Isn't Toby way too old? Unless they really were going to go for a "One More Day" style reboot to tie the old with the new, I can't see that happening.
Garfield out please. All I'm asking.
He's too old to be Miles Morales.Thank goodness. Glover please.
Yup. There's no way they don't. Again - when the tentative aspects of this deal were first leaked a couple months ago, there was profit-sharing included. Marvel is helping produce the Sony movies - that means they WILL get their cut of the proceeds. Maybe not the largest cut. But they're still getting a cut.
I also wouldn't be surprised if the Spidey movies are where some of these Netflix characters show up.
This. Everyone wins.There's way more money to be made in toys and whatnot, which Marvel owns. Having Spidey in the MCU means that Sony's Spidey films are bascially guaranteed billion box office. And it also means Disney can push Spidey merchandise even harder.
lol. I kinda feel bad for him. I assume Webb is out as well?