Gambit 1138
Banned
Ultimate Spider-Man (we are talking about the comic not the awful cartoon I assume) is the best Spidey interpretation ever I think.
Finally we agree on something
Ultimate Spider-Man (we are talking about the comic not the awful cartoon I assume) is the best Spidey interpretation ever I think.
Which costume do you peeps want Spider-Man to wear in the new film series? For me I would like to see him wearing costume with a similar style, desing and color to the first Superior Spider-Man costume but a bit baggy like Miles Morales' first Spider-Man costume.
That'd be my guess. Disney have been successful with Mavel by using the same strategy Jobs taught them for dealing with Pixar; smile, be accommodating, and collect the fat checks. Sony have been successful with Spidey, but it's clear that Marvel are firing on all cylinders right now. Sony should be looking to benefit by contributing to Marvel's efforts, not guiding them. These aren't "Sony movies" any more than they're "Disney movies." They're "Marvel movies."
The only issue I can see is if Disney get upset about Marvel making money for Sony "instead of" Disney, but Disney still own the lion's share of the properties, and I think they ones they do own are made that much stronger by Spidey's presence in the MCU.
I actually love Otto's second costume. It's probably my favorite Spider-Man costume. So sleek looking and with so many cool tech upgrades.
Ultimate Spider-Man (we are talking about the comic not the awful cartoon I assume) is the best Spidey interpretation ever I think.
nothing could be worse than captain america "costume" in Avengers 1. It was seriously just a hoodie. His suits in Cap 2, avengers 2 are so much better
Wrong. He told Pratt to quit reading it and to read Annihilation if anything.[/b]
He's never said this - like ever. He just said they weren't doing that run for the movies.
Come on, Miles! Marvel, you know what to do...
Wrong. He told Pratt to quit reading it and to read Annihilation if anything.
We don't know if he doesn't like Bendis or not. Just that Bendis' run is a new chapter for the Guardians and Pratt was playing a very different Star Lord. So Bendis' run was not conducive to his research of the character.
And if he liked Bendis's run pretty positive we would of gotten Bendis's RR, and a desert planet as Knowhere instead of a floating head.We know he invited DnA to visit the set and not Bendis.
We know he invited DnA to visit the set and not Bendis.
Wrong. He told Pratt to quit reading it and to read Annihilation if anything.
We know he invited DnA to visit the set and not Bendis.
Like what?
Oh, no question. I was thinking more down the road. Not that it isn't already, but if Spider-Man "becomes" a huge franchise, I could see Disney maybe getting upset that their "employees" Marvel are putting money in to the pockets of another company and tightening the reigns in response. However, since any success Sony have with the Spider-Man movies ultimately benefits Disney in the form of merchandising and strengthening their own MCU brand, I would think the two companies could continue collaborating.This deal would have had to get approved by Bob Iger and Tom Staggs before being announced so they are already on board and don't have a problem with Sony making a profit.
Yes. He told him not to read Bendis stuff because that's not what they were doing with the movie.
There's been absolutely nothing said about how Gunn feels about Bendis' GoTG except for what's being projected by people who don't like his run.
But if Sony used that shotgun they'd be stuck wherever they stopped cause they don't know how to drive.And Sony literally has a shotgun and can force Marvel to steer the car any direction whenever they want.
Plus, if Disney are basically hiring their talent out to other studios, wouldn't they get a cut of the box office anyway? I'm not really sure how all of that works. I know these movies are being "made by Marvel" now, but they're also being made by Wheedon and Favreau. So who runs the MCU and makes sure it's actually a universe? This Feige guy? Who's he? I got the impression that Joss was fairly influential in where things were headed overall. Is that true?
lol Well, basically. That's the same reason Disney don't use their shotgun on Marvel. Disney don't know any more about making superhero movies than Sony do. Marvel are the experts here. Disney/Sony just front the ~$200M it takes to make a decent superhero movie, and collect the profits for their trouble.But if Sony used that shotgun they'd be stuck wherever they stopped cause they don't know how to drive.
Yes except if he liked it don't you think he would of let Pratt read it or base his movie off of it? I mean not that far of a stretch.
Like what?
Maybe this will inspire those jerks at Marvel to put out the second volume of the omnibus editions. <_____<
No. Please let Slotts creations out of this and go with the classic character rooster.Do you guys think that Silk should be introduced?
You do realise Bendis doesn't give a shit, right? Besides which, he's on the Marvel Comics-MCU council. So there's probably a few suggestions he made that reached the final film.
Yes except if he liked it don't you think he would of let Pratt read it or base his movie off of it? I mean not that far of a stretch.
Do you guys think that Silk should be introduced?
YES YES YES!they can just make the next movie about the spidey clone wars and have the lead be Ben Reilly. everyone will be happy.
I think Kaine is better.they can just make the next movie about the spidey clone wars and have the lead be Ben Reilly. everyone will be happy.
you realize that bendis run started in march 2013 which is probably when gunn was already well into working on his draft for GOTG? why the fuck would he base his movie off a run that was just beginning?
he probably hadn't even read it or formed an opinion on it by the time he was halfway through his work.
Yeah, seems like Marvel might get performance-based compensation similar to what a producer gets for their contributions to the movie, according to some of the articles we've seen.
they can just make the next movie about the spidey clone wars and have the lead be Ben Reilly. everyone will be happy.
Good news everyone, I found Mary Jane. You may thank me later.
Good news everyone, I found Mary Jane. You may thank me later.
Good news everyone, I found Mary Jane. You may thank me later.
What? Sony are getting 60% of the Civil War box office just for letting Spidey appear in it? Are you sure that's right? Even if it's a Spidey movie you're talking about, Disney getting 40% for allowing the Marvel guys to make it for Sony seems like a big take. It's still Sony's project made with Sony's money, after all.Supposedly, Sony gets 60% of the box-office, so that leaves Disney/Marvel with the remaining box-office and all the merchandise rights, which is where the real money is at. If Civil War does a billion, Sony gets a nice chunk, but Disney/Marvel get a two hour commercial for Spiderman-brand everything, that I'm sure is another billion besides.
Supposedly, Sony gets 60% of the box-office, so that leaves Disney/Marvel with the remaining box-office and all the merchandise rights, which is where the real money is at. If Civil War does a billion, Sony gets a nice chunk, but Disney/Marvel get a two hour commercial for Spiderman-brand everything, that I'm sure is another billion besides.