DrBo42 said:http://www.justin.tv/tiatika2#r=MAahkck~ Co-op story. Just started.
Net_Wrecker said:Just from watching like 2 minutes of that, I just got super hyped like no other vid of this has done before. I absolutely LOVE co-op stealth situations.
Has DLC been confirmed for this? Despite the lack of a team based adversarial mode, I could see these Deniable Ops modes lasting for while with new maps being introduced through DLC packs.
heck, it's been mentioned a number of times in this thread already, as well as the whole uproar in response to it when IGN showed it.Nightshade1765 said:Both his post, and the post he quoted have that in it. Yikes.
Nelo Ice said:
:lolneorej said:My cats were not so thrilled about the ROWR-sound, though.
Najaf said:There is not one mention of the competitive multiplayer component, Face-Off. Not one. The removal of spies vs. mercs is hard to get past, but having a feature obviously have such a small impact that it does not even get a mention is shameful.
Net_Wrecker said:Has DLC been confirmed for this? Despite the lack of a team based adversarial mode, I could see these Deniable Ops modes lasting for while with new maps being introduced through DLC packs.
Been playing SP this weekend, it's actually more 24 than 24: The Game.
Caspel said:Not sure if I would revisit...
MMaRsu said:If I could buy shit in dollars I would buy a lot more games. But too bad I live in Euroland where new games cost 60 euro's in the store, which is like the equivalent to 120 dollars or something
Najaf said:There is not one mention of the competitive multiplayer component, Face-Off. Not one. The removal of spies vs. mercs is hard to get past, but having a feature obviously have such a small impact that it does not even get a mention is shameful.
nilam01 said:Where the f*** are the reviews, I'm getting sick of embargo's the game is about to release and except for ign none of the online sites have posted their reviews.
nilam01 said:Where the f*** are the reviews, I'm getting sick of embargo's the game is about to release and except for ign none of the online sites have posted their reviews.
Jesse Jane said:reviews of the online multiplayer experience should never be made without having a week+ to experience the online.. I don't blame them for not focusing in on that aspect.
SketchTheArtist said:You're a dick.
Loxley said:Spoiler that shit bitte ><
DrBo42 said:Here's Face Off is you guys haven't seen it yet. Enjoy. Happy Conviction week GAF!
No problem. I wish the person that was streaming it actually had a sense of how to play. But if you watch for a while, you can really see the potential of the mode.Najaf said:Thank you. I've been really curious about this.
MrCompletely said:cool, so looking at the round recap screen
AI Enemy = 1 point
Killing Opponent = 5 Points
Death = -3 points
I like this.
I wonder if the sonar googles pick up the opposing player and whether you can mark/execute on him.
I wouldn't mind review embargos so much if they worked similar to how they do in the movie industry and only crappy titles were embargoed. It's easy to simply connect the dots and ignore those.NHale said:Embargo ends tomorrow.
IGN published their review because they made a deal with Ubisoft to get the rights for an exclusive review. Hilary Goldstein has a lot of "friends" in the industry, so he manages to get this deals very often.
The result of these IGN exclusive reviews, usually ends with a review >9.0 where a game can score higher than the score of any of the 5 sub-categories.
it's commom for Hilary reviews.. Fable II for example. But it got a 8.8.. any other conspiracy theories? :lolNHale said:Embargo ends tomorrow.
IGN published their review because they made a deal with Ubisoft to get the rights for an exclusive review. Hilary Goldstein has a lot of "friends" in the industry, so he manages to get this deals very often.
The result of these IGN exclusive reviews, usually ends with a review >9.0 where a game can score higher than the score of any of the 5 sub-categories.
DrBo42 said:No problem. I wish the person that was streaming it actually had a sense of how to play. But if you watch for a while, you can really see the potential of the mode.
DrBo42 said:Looks like you can turn on "No Goggles" in the Face-Off lobby. Other options include pistols only and enemy density.
Edit: Hunter mode starts in the above stream around 28m and 45s.
Najaf said:One question for those that have it: can you map aiming to the left trigger?
To score more points than your opponent. Doesn't matter how you do it.BigKaboom2 said:What's the actual objective for Face-Off? Is it ever advisable to work slowly or are you just trying to kill everyone as fast as possible?
Najaf said:I don't know how to feel about Face-off after watching that. It seems to be a big run and gun arena with bots. While I know that you don't have to play it like that guy was, it seems obvious that using a lot of stealth will not rack up the score as fast as the full-auto, guns blazing approach.
While I am in no place to judge the design decisions at this point, it seems like it would have made more sense to reward stealth play. For instance, stealth kills (where the AI does not see you) are worth 2 points, and melee stealth kills are worth 3.
Speaking of melee, is there a knife in the campaign? I loved the knife of Pandora Tomorrow.
Syringe said:Our review is up. 8/10 with a 9/10 in our second opinion. Main reviewer is a Splinter Cell fan, second one is not: REVIEW
We also have 50 pictures captured from the game in full size (cannot link them though). Here is an example...
beast786 said:If the SPis between 5-6hrs than I am very dissapointed. I dont give a damn about MP. I love so far everthing about it. If its confirmmed for that length I am going to wait.