Everywhere, normally games use static lighting to achieve this lighting quality or dynamic with a bunch of tricks to fool the eye, this time around it's just dynamic lighting behaving as it should in real life, without trickery, which helps boost dev workflow while maintaining or improving lighting quality
Could someone post when in the clip you can see well (compare) the RT GI?
How so? There's a comparison video but you can see the RT everywhere, it's just being used as the base lighting model so you don't have to rely on post processing, baking, screen space effects, probs, etc. to achieve the same (yet inferior) result, this is why I'm praying for RT to finally become the norm, the performance hit will lower with time because devs will finally dedicate to optimize it properly as Ubisoft and Id Software did
RDR2 should be doable if R* bothers. And it would be a good fit for the console, IMO.
It isn't outdated tech, isn't ? Like low clock speed or lower power level doesn't necessarily mean outdated.
Sarcasm. I'm poking fun at the people that drop that line. I should have put it in quotes to be more clear.
It uses Ampere no? So a 5 year old architecture.
At best it's an aproximation of how light should act, cyberpunk pathtracing is more advanced and it's not always precise.
Well, yeah you can't just simulate the actual physics, it's just a model of how we perceive it in reality but you get the idea, it's still better for devs and for graphical leap than raster lighting
I said this in a thread and got laugh reactions and shit from a lot of usual suspects, for some reason people think this means "more powerful" instead of more efficient or with more tools at disposition lol. Even Switch 1 had at least a more modern feature than PS4 back in the day, tiled rendering, which made it punch above its weight and it didn't come out to consoles until Pro/X came out afaik, didn't mean that Switch 1 was more powerful, just that it could resolve something better than PS4 this the difference shorten
You forgot the Tensor Cores in Switch 2 also allow for stuff not possible on PS5 like DLSS, texture compression and anything that devs want to implement that is ML reliant like, if I'm not mistaken, the body/faces recognition in GameChat or Mario Party Jamboree TV, the mic noise suppression, etc.
You two should've got here before the direct comparisons to PS5. Now you just look silly, not to mention it's not on PS4.
The game doesn't even run well on SD at the lowest settings, which looks a lot worse than this….So now it's Switch 2 vs. PC.
Looks lower than the lowest setting on PC.
And?? Some people have both platforms.So now it's Switch 2 vs. PC.
So now it's Switch 2 vs. PC.
I think a decent PC likely out-performs a PS5, let alone a Switch 2. But by all means, let's commence with the comparisons. There's your "And??".
What people shitposting on here. No it's only rational discussion about the games performance lol.
Impressive for an handheld but: perfomance are quite unstable, raytracing artifacts are very visible on the metal, weird with DLSS.
Honestly, I was expecting Steam Deck-level graphical and performance disaster before entering this thread based on the thread title.
Expectation
Reality
They already moved the goalpost… The game looks fine and a lot better than i expected.Honestly, I was expecting Steam Deck-level graphical and performance disaster before entering this thread based on the thread title.
Expectation
Reality
Why not? Just stating a possible fact. I like to know about the product before buying it.
