Guild Wars 2, in my case. Going to double up on the MMOing.Luigi87 said:Another game!
Guild Wars 2, in my case. Going to double up on the MMOing.Luigi87 said:Another game!
If they are afraid to show the first couple of levels without major tweaking at this point in the development cycle SWTOR has tumbled into the abyss.antonz said:Not if you are sending out surveys randomly asking for opinions. It was a hair brain decision to have an old build used from the start. But they did hire Dallas Dickinson sooo.. its not shocking
Is a monthly fee a new concept to you? Are you aware you can buy the game for $60?Gvaz said:You still have to drop $120 on a game that's already possibly costing you like $130
Versus $180 on a game that's already possibly costing me like $130?Gvaz said:You still have to drop $120 on a game that's already possibly costing you like $130
Well they did fold Mythic into Bioware, so they probably wanted that three star talent with five star drive.antonz said:But they did hire Dallas Dickinson sooo.. its not shocking
Spending $120 at once to save $60 when you don't even know if you'll play more than 3 months one after the other is a waste of money.Parn said:What the hell are you getting at?
Dude. No one was suggesting that discounted yearly subscriptions are a new concept. Billychu asked how much it was to prepay for a year, I answered, and you're all like SO YOU SAVE SIXTY BUX SO WUTGvaz said:Generally speaking I usually only sub for maybe 6-8 months out of the year, tops.
And no, it's not a new concept, and I preordered the CE.
Yeah. I'm about an hour away from the fires. Not fun.Parn said:For whatever it's worth since we're speculating as it is, the beta servers are in Austin, and Texas is kind of in the middle of a serious wildfire problem.
Jarmel said:I love how people are thinking the new build is the reason for the delay.
maabus1999 said:As someone who has been in the Beta for nearly a year and seen numerous builds come and go, I can confidently say you are incorrect in your assumption. When they release a new build, they shut everything down (including login client server) on average for 10 days.
If everyone is lucky, they may be faster this time but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Jarmel said:Again they didn't delay, they essentially cancelled it. There is a signficant difference between saying they're pushing back the September beta for a couple of weeks and another saying it's cancelled till further notice.
maabus1999 said:And if you want to know, there are some criticisms and I would say some people (a minority) do not like how closely the gameplay is like WoW (burn out perhaps) but the vast vast majority of beta testers enjoy the game immensly, especially when the content past a certain level point is not included in the July build (as said by a developer) yet people keep rolling alts up and beyond out of enjoyment.
In pure honesty, there is NO reason to even speculate about any critcisms until we see what they changed/fixed in the next build (and they do substantial changes time to time).
Not this again. We still haven't gotten the other oneJarmel said:I'd bet my dick on it.
So that's what Stephen Reid was talking about on Twitter.Parn said:For whatever it's worth since we're speculating as it is, the beta servers are in Austin, and Texas is kind of in the middle of a serious wildfire problem.
Last Hearth said:And if you want to know, there are some criticisms and I would say some people (a minority) do not like how closely the gameplay is like WoW (burn out perhaps) but the vast vast majority of beta testers enjoy the game immensly, especially when the content past a certain level point is not included in the July build (as said by a developer) yet people keep rolling alts up and beyond out of enjoyment.
I guess Bioware's PR team should just have consulted you, ditch the surveys and focus groups and data collection.Last Hearth said:And the feedback was not negative. Of alll the people I chatted with during the test I met exactly one person who wasn't extremely enthusiastic about the experience, and even he wasn't totally negative just not blown away, and the forum for the weekend testers the posts have been overwhelming positive.
antonz said:They didnt cancel Beta weekends. They cancelled this weeks because the new build isnt ready for deployment and they have a ton of data from the old build to process already. It has already been hinted before weekend tests would go into October so its not a big deal.
Jarmel said:Again you don't cancel when you can delay. Something happened not attached to the new roll out otherwise Bioware would have stated that September betas would continue as planned after a couple of weeks and they would extend it into October to make up for the lost weekends.
I'd bet my dick on it.
Gvaz said:So you save $60 a year...okay?
maabus1999 said:Or I could go with my experience of how long it takes on average for a new build to go live after they shutdown the servers. Knowing that (and maybe when the current "switch" is turned off), it is probable the regular beta testers won't be trying the next build until possibly the last week of september if not early october. Add in the fact they most likely want to make sure the new build is stable for a few days before doing a more public weekend test and you get a longer delay.
So he is right, there will be no more testing in September for the weekend. Mid october would be my earliest guess from experience with bioware and has nothing to do with feedback (this is independent from good and bad feedback btw).
Last Hearth said:More definitive than the factless speculation that because of this weekend test cancellation "must mean that the feedback from the weekend test was negative". While I do not have comprehensive knowledge, I am reading the forums set up for the weekend testers, and if there were strong negativity I'm sure some of it would have simmered up there.
Like I said in a previous post, it's entirely possible that teams aren't communicating internally as well as they should and the newer build intended for the September weekend beta tests ended up missing the deadline, but no one stopped the whole process for starting up the beta weekend, rolling out with an existing build instead.FieryBalrog said:Why on earth would they hype up September weekend beta testing if they knew a fresh build was going to demolish their September weekend betas.
Jarmel said:Then you state that you're delaying the beta testing for a month. You don't just cancel something and not give a new date or even estimate of a new date unless something went off the reservation.
Jarmel said:Then you state that you're delaying the beta testing for a month. You don't just cancel something and not give a new date or even estimate of a new date unless something went off the reservation.
As someone said left hand had no idea what right hand was doing. It was hairbrain for sure to do all this with a new build on the horizon. Especially when as with prior builds the servers go down for sometime.FieryBalrog said:Why on earth would they hype up September weekend beta testing if they knew a fresh build was going to demolish their September weekend betas.
Jarmel said:Unless they didn't care enough to post in the forums. Forums almost always represent a small portion of the population.
It's the complete opposite during beta, especially for MMOs. We've all (or at least some of us have) done this tango more than enough times to know how it goes.maabus1999 said:And normally forums will have more complaints then praises
FieryBalrog said:It's the complete opposite during beta, especially for MMOs. We've all (or at least some of us have) done this tango more than enough times to know how it goes.
At any rate, no one really knows how the weekend beta was received but Bioware themselves. I'm pretty sure "I talked to some dudes" doesn't cut it as definitive knowledge.
Hawk269 said:I decided to read between the lines of this post and I kept seeing the same thing come up...2012....2012....2012. They clearly state that they did not want to roll out the new build without internal testers and the testing group to try it first...unless this build is close to a release canidate, I think that it will be 2012 (Feb..2012) before we see it.
I was saying that before E3. Get in line!ElectricBlue187 said:Hate to say I told you so.
(But I did. During E3)
No, Mythic killed Warhammer, not a wow expansion.Morn said:If they release in February, EA will have another WAR situation on their hands where they release a hyped MMO a month or two before a new WoW expansion. It'll kill the game the same way it killed WAR.
markot said:No, Mythic killed Warhammer, not a wow expansion.
They had million+ buy the game, they didnt stick around because the game was poor and lacking in so many areas.
antonz said:EA just confirmed again today its launching this year
The company still expects the MMO to launch this calender year, but EAs fiscal guidance takes into account a possible slip into first calendar quarter of 2012 (fiscal Q4) if needed, Brown said. We have a date set internally [for calendar Q4], with a lot of assumptions around it, he said.
Most people who I knew who played warhammer quit along time before their 30 days was upMorn said:They didn't stick around because Lich King came out right when their free 30 days were up.
I doubt that.maabus1999 said:I know exactly what is being said for the past half dozen months.
Sorry, it's not that I don't believe you, it's that you have no real way of knowing regardless of how many times you repeat yourself.maabus1999 said:Again there are some critcisms (mainly either it is not SWG or it is too much like WoW. Some other more valid ones but won't cover those as I'm pushing a gray area on what I can say) but the vast majority enjoy the game.
Morn said:They didn't stick around because Lich King came out right when their free 30 days were up.
FieryBalrog said:I doubt that.
Sorry, it's not that I don't believe you, it's that you have no real way of knowing regardless of how many times you repeat yourself.