But the most important thing is that it's not necessary. It doesn't bring anything to the table. It's another client. I don't want Capsule. I don't want Origin. I don't want another client. I don't believe Origin liberates me to have a closer relationship with EA. I don't believe running their own service has resulted in more game patches, more new content, or better games. I don't believe that sales devalue IPs and neither does EA except when they do. That it's a client that doesn't actually do anything makes it less valuable than a client that does.
Sorry for the late reply to this, but I wanted to agree and add that one thing I don't think gets mentioned nearly enough is that I don't think people should trust EA (or Ubisoft for that matter) to continue to commit to prioritize the PC as a platform. I also don't think it gets enough mention of what it would mean for games bought on Origin or Uplay should either EA or Ubi decide to truly de-emphasize the PC.
Here you have EA saying that PC specifically isn't even their 2nd highest priority right now. When the new consoles launch, there is going to be a ton of emphasis on console games (already is). Does anyone really trust that EA is going to be working hard to improve their PC service at the same time? They're already saying it's going to take a backseat to mobile and consoles. I wouldn't be surprised if Ubisoft is doing the same thing (if they haven't stated so publicly).
So another reason that I personally view Origin and UPlay warily is that I simply don't trust EA or Ubisoft to consistently prioritize the PC space. Valve, on the other hand, has shown consistent dedication to the PC for the better part of a decade and if anything, things like DOTA 2, TF2, and their continued improvements to Steam imply an increasing dedication to PC gaming by Valve.